HRM calorie accurac...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] HRM calorie accuracy

8 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
93 Views
Posts: 1083
Full Member
Topic starter
 

You enter age, weight, height and gender, but I presume it's still guessing somewhat when calculating calories burnt?

So, how accurate are they?


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:32 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
Topic starter
 

It's a Polar F4


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

Not at all.

Polar are generally reckoned to have the most accurate algorithms. I reckon you can half anything Garmin tells you and Endomondo just works it out on duration (so you're still burning calories sitting outside the pub on your mid-ride break).

Edit: probably not[i] too [/i]bad then


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:34 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
Topic starter
 

See it's told me 1040 kcal for 1 hr constant uphill cycling, plus 10 mins back down again. That seems way too high.


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:36 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

It [i]is[/i] weight dependent 🙂


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:37 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Mmmm, I'm not skinny 🙂


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They suck.. I'm pretty fit so register as obese on the BMI scale but I can run on the crosstrainer for 30 mins and burn over 600 cals (after adding in weight/height/age). I wasn't sweating half as much as I should be for that figure..


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:42 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

Completely unscientific, but there are a few online calorie calculators that should give some alternative answers.
http://www.healthstatus.com/cgi-bin/calc/calculator.cgi
http://www.nutristrategy.com/fitness/cycling.htm


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:44 pm
Posts: 1083
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers I'll take a look


 
Posted : 24/05/2013 9:46 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!