Fun XC hardtail?
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Fun XC hardtail?

9 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
72 Views
Posts: 9175
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Considering getting an XC (or "trail" whatever that means) bike soon as I've been enjoying the longer rides recently and wouldn't mind something a bit more suited to them - there's only so much climbing you can take on a small Scott Voltage before it becomes a soul destroying chore! I've always had smaller fun bikes where I've massively compromised the climbing capabilities for good downhill performance (charge blender, sc bullit, voltage, trailstar etc) but now I'd like something lightweight with decent geometry that actually makes climbs enjoyable. And if possible, still fun and stable feeling down hill. Probably would get used for stuff like the long mynd, trail centres and the peaks.

Is a 29er the way to go for this? I'd try 27.5 but feel its a bit too similar to 26 to make the change of size worthwhile. I'm only 5'9" with a 29" inside leg though so is a 29er going to be completely ridiculous for me?

The [url= http://vitusbikes.com/products/sentier-290/ ]Vitus Sentier 290[/url] looks really sorted for the money, has anyone got any experience with them? I like the look of the [url= https://www.canyon.com/en/mountainbikes/bike.html?b=3642 ]Canyon AL 5.9[/url] as well. On One Parkwood seems good value but my god the're ugly, would take a lot of convincing for that one! Any other suggestions would be great.

Trying to keep to a budget of around £400-500 second hand.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:05 am
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

Charge Cooker.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:09 am
Posts: 10942
Free Member
 

With a 29" inside leg, on a 29er, I'd be worried about saddle/h'bar height, and not being able to get the h'bars low enough, especially if you want a decent climber. Try before you buy.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stock answer Cotic soul?


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:22 am
Posts: 9175
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Had a BFe and found it very uninspiring, just a boring ride. Suppose the soul is a lot lighter though?


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:24 am
Posts: 1162
Free Member
 

Cotic Solaris is what you're looking for _tom_

A very capable bike indeed that I've owned for 2 and a half years and do not tire of.

The geo is nice for extended xc miles. The ride isn't so harsh and it's very composed on the descents. Nice short stays to make it fun to play on.

It's a very confidence inspiring bike which quickly became the bike of choice so I sold my expensive carbon 140mm FS last year as it wasn't being used.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:41 am
Posts: 2369
Free Member
 

Another + for the Solaris. Had mine less than a year but love it.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I built a Cotic Soul recently and love it. Like being a kid again, hoofing around on a bike. And I can put in some serious miles - far more than I was inspired to on my fs (which was light too)..

Maybe it's not the brand though - maybe just the difference between fs and hardtail...


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 7:58 am
Posts: 8849
Free Member
 

456 carbon covers both bases imo. lightweight base frame (1500gms) for climbs, tough and takes upto 6" forks for descent. on one also sell a slackset for it if you want. just get a plain black, then doesn't matter if you scuff it.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 8:11 am
Posts: 9175
Free Member
Topic starter
 

With a 29" inside leg, on a 29er, I'd be worried about saddle/h'bar height, and not being able to get the h'bars low enough, especially if you want a decent climber. Try before you buy.

Hmm yeah thats true.. maybe this would be a good time to cash in on cheap "obsolete" 26" stuff unless 27.5/29 is actually worth it?


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 8:40 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!