Fitting 29er forks ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Fitting 29er forks to a 26er lt ht - does it work? (+ pics wanted)

11 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
84 Views
Posts: 2763
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm thinking of singlespeeding and rigidising my Chumba HX1. As it's built to run a 140mm suspension fork normal 26er forks would seem to be a bit short so would I be right in thinking some 29er forks would work ok? I'd be running 26er wheels, none of this 96er nonsense thanks!

Or will fork rake issues, which I don't really understand, kill me?

Any pics of any bikes running this setup much appreciated.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 12:59 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

will the tyre go through the forks ok.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 1:11 pm
Posts: 97
Full Member
 

My Inbred was better (for me), with a 470mm fork. Front always felt too low with 440mn. I have a pic somewhere. Tried it with 29" wheel & it didn't feel right for me, but ironically the 29er Inbred I'm on now is great.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
 

a 26er rigid rigid may seem too short, but don't forgot the extra height from the 29er wheel

at the end of the day it'll come down to trial and error depending on the type of terrain you'll be riding


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A 29er fork with a 26" wheel will give the same A to C height as a 140mm fork and has been done many times by others on this forum and apparently works.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 1:57 pm
Posts: 97
Full Member
 

[url= http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6225/6276211349_da4278abd8.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6225/6276211349_da4278abd8.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/takisawa2/6276211349/ ]IMAG0232[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/takisawa2/ ]pten2106[/url], on Flickr

[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/takisawa2/sets/72157627842802535/ ]More pics here, but here [/url]you go. Worked really well for me. I always felt the bike rode perfectly at 120mm, but the 440mm was more like a sagged 100mm fork, not a 120mm. The front end was slightly easier to lift, & coupled with wide - std dia carbon bars that induced a bit of flex, the ride was actually quite good. It wont be for everyone, but for me it worked well till I tried a 29er. 😉


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 2:27 pm
Posts: 2763
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cool, cheers guys.

The tapered niner forks are calling me now...


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 3:37 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Jenn did the Great Divide race on one;

[img] [/img]

edit although that looks like a trek 69er frame, tbh.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 3:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Let me know how you get on IvanDobski, I'm considering doing exactly the same thing as you.

Shame that most of the responses you got were from people who didn't read your post.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]Shame that most of the responses you got were from people who didn't read your post. [/i]

you're right.

measure a-c of whatever fork you are currntly running when it's sagged and then buy a rigid fork that's closest to that.

might look a bit odd mind


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 3:53 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15473
Free Member
 

Its what I have done on one of mine.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 4:06 pm
 OCB
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ok, it's not in anyway a 26er LTHT, but my old Kona has had 29er PII's fitted, with a 26" wheel (for ages now) and it's bloomin' lovely. So much so this gets ridden [i]easily[/i] 10x more than anything else I own (even tho' it's probably older than some people on the forum).

😛

[img] [/img]

It did have some 100mm Manitou forks for a while, which were ok (if you [i]like[/i] suspension 😕 ), but these forks suit it much better.


 
Posted : 24/10/2011 6:21 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!