You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
[i]The question, the final of around five, came via an Associated Press journalist from the press tent near the finish line. It was delivered via a video link to Wiggins, who sat in a cabin on the back of a truck in the technical zone.
Since his fourth place in the Tour de France in 2009 and throughout this last year, critics placed doubt on his performances. In light of several doping cases in cycling, Alberto Contador to Riccardo Riccò, the critics wondered if Wiggins doped as well.
Sky has dominated stage races this year. The team has helped Wiggins to wins in a never before seen triple: Paris-Nice, the Tour of Romandy and the Critérium du Dauphiné. In the Dauphiné, it had four men in a key nine-man move over a mountain pass.
As Sky conquered, cynics wrote remarks on Twitter, comparing the team to Lance Armstrong's US Postal/Discovery Channel team. The American team dominated the Tour for seven years, but since has had several of its members linked with doping. The US Anti-Doping Agency in the last month charged Armstrong.
"There was some chatter in the Twitter-sphere about the comparison between Sky and US Postal," said the AP journalist. "I'm wondering your reaction. And, what do you say to the cynics who say you have to be doped up to win the Tour de France?"
Wiggins, sitting behind a desk in the cabin, picked up the microphone and delivered his message nearly 100 metres away to the press tent.
"Honestly, they're just ****ing w**kers," Wiggins said. "I cannot be dealing with people like that. [Laughs, from the press tent - ed.] It justifies their own bone-idleness because they can't ever imagine applying themselves to anything in their lives. And it's easy for them to sit under a pseudo-name on Twitter and write that sort of s**t rather than get off their arses in their own life and apply themselves, and work hard at something and achieve something. And that's ultimately it."
The translator readied to deliver the message in French, but before she could, Wiggins picked up the microphone and sent the final message to the cynics: "C**ts!"[/i]
http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/533790/wiggins-lashes-out-after-doping-accusations.html
And they say he gives boring answers...
Chapeau to him I say, made me chuckle when I read that!
Nice, if only all sporting press conferences were so honest
Utterly believeable..
On the other hand, if he had mentioned his lawyers, the doubts might have crept in 😉
That's brilliant, good on Brad.
Good on him and his Fisher Price hair!!!
I've just read Hero's, Villains and Velodromes. Dave Brailsford was asked why Team GB had concentrated on the track and not the road. He replied that they wanted to run a clean team right from the off. But they were aware that all the top Tour teams were systemically doping, so what would be the point in competing against them, when you were only going to be looking at 4th or 5th if you stayed clean
I think any rumours are from people who's noses have been put well and truly out of joint by the cheeky young upstarts coming in and winning clean!
I think Wiggins dealt with it well.
If he is clean (which I believe is the case), both Wiggo and the team will have worked hard to get him in this strong position and to have ignorant people put the knife in must smart somewhat.
Was the question sent in by the forum?
Quality
Quick search for video of this has brought up nothing. Reuters report says he exclaimed "Cut!" at the end of the interview, I want to see it for myself. (The f'ing w@nkers bit is not in doubt).
Anyone got a link?
I believe he's clean, he comes from the British track programme, which has a culture of clean racing. But, after 100 years of doping in cycling the fans have every right to be cynical. there have too many false dawns with regards to clean racing and I don't think it's his place to call diehard fans of the sport ****ing ****ers and ****s.
I believe we are a lot cleaner now, you just have to look at racers who once were contenders being dropped on cat1 climbs this year, Scarponi and Gesink to name 2. 3 years ago they would have been up there, no doubt.
Just because its our very own Worzel look-a-like, he shouldn't get away with that. If you are in yellow at the Tour you will have to answer questions about doping. He needs to sit down, grow up and talk sensibly to journalists about the subject, not swear like a 14 year old.
Pro cycling only has itself to blame, and the riders need to be part of the solution, swearing doesn't help.
+1 crikey, well put.
Pro cycling only has itself to blame, and the riders need to be part of the solution, swearing doesn't help.
Don't be so bloody stupid! WTF has that got to do with Brad? That question wasn't about some generic 'pro cycling' mass. It was directed at him personally, and his team-mates who are working their arses off for him. You take responsibility for your own actions, not other peoples. They can take care of their own! And live with the consequences!
Brad comes from a clean track background where, lest you forget, he was phenomenally successful. He then moves over to the road in a team that has always been proudly clean, and is in no way tainted with what's gone on before with their supposed 'competition'.
He's therefore got EVERY right in the world to tell people to **** off for questioning his integrity
That mad me laugh, and I pretty much agree with him. But, he's always going to upset a few people if he uses the C bomb.
Binners, +1.
Some people just look for the negative in every situation though, eh crikey?
Very succinct I think!
Pro cycling only has itself to blame, and the riders need to be part of the solution, swearing doesn't help.
Sky are the solution. They're proving you can win by having a good team, training hard and being clean.
Good for him for sticking up for himself but can`t help most proffesional sportsmen would have delivered the message more eloquently!
Made me laugh though.........
and his team-mates who are working their arses off for him
now I believe Brad is clean, and always has been, but his team mates? they may be clean now, but people like Richie Porte and Michael Rogers? racing with SaxoBank and T mobile in the 2000s?
Good on him.
I'd love to see the interview but it doesn't seem to be available anywhere 🙁
Good for him for sticking up for himself but can`t help most proffesional sportsmen would have delivered the message more eloquently!
Extremely eloquent I thought - and you're hardly one to talk!
The negative in this situation is Bradleys inability to deal with the media in an adult way. What's he going to do next time the subject comes up, give out Chinese burns?
Remember a certain tour winner talking about people believing in miracles; that's why people are cynical, that's why people are negative. 20 years of history won't go away by swearing, but by sensible open and honest debate, we might begin to take pro cycling at face value.
I don't believe for a minute that Dave Brailsford would sign anyone up for Sky who had even the slightest real suspicion of doping hanging over them. And rumours and genuine suspicion are 2 completely different things!
"I don't think it's his place to call diehard fans of the sport * * and ****. "
Really? So you think it's okay for so-called 'die-hard cycling fans' to direct suspicion at someone without even the slightest suggestion of wrongdoing?
I bet those podium girls just love kissing his sweat filled sideburns every evening for (hopefully) the next couple of weeks.
FFS crikey!!! Who's being cynical? Sky have put themselves up as the Antidote to this cynicism by openly challenging it from day one!!!! The cynicism lies with the teams that went before and who are tainted by it! If Brad wants to swear at people to get home a point he believes passionately in, then good luck to him!!! Or perhaps you'd prefer a more 'Alan Shearer post-match analysis style? 🙄
I really REALLY hope he is clean AND I hope he wins.
Trouble is, the legacy is very obviously not a clean one
[i]I bet those podium girls just love kissing his sweat filled sideburns every evening for (hopefully) the next couple of weeks[/i]
My missus pointed that out yesterday. The winners of each jersey each day must utterly hum after five hours in the saddle, and the podium girls have to kiss them, and then stand and smile whilst they have massively stinky armpits waved in their faces...
Sky are the solution. They're proving you can win by having a good team, training hard and being clean [b]these days[/b].
Just because its our very own Worzel look-a-like, he shouldn't get away with that. If you are in yellow at the Tour you will have to answer questions about doping. He needs to sit down, grow up and talk sensibly to journalists about the subject, not swear like a 14 year old.
It was a good answer and showed his feelings if yo want anodine answers from media trained sports people batting away questions with pre prepared answers given to them by their media trainers then listen to footballers...its delightful to heasr their insights no really it is
The negative in this situation is Bradleys inability to deal with the media in an adult way. What's he going to do next time the subject comes up, give out Chinese burns?
The press found it funny and tbh WTF is the point asking him what folk on twitter said - is that great journalism and a great question?
I like it but he could have done it without the swearing
I don't think it's his place to call diehard fans of the sport * * and ****.
Pretty sure a diehard fan would know the team and the Brailsfords view.
Is there any video of this at all? Would love to see it.
[url=
here's a video of Wiggo calling a cameraman a c***...[/url]
I'll type this slowly for the slower readers...
I'm not saying Wiggins or Sky have anything to hide.
I'm not suggesting that he shouldn't say what he thinks.
I am suggesting that procycling has a long, deep, dirty association with doping and that therefore, the rider leading the Tour will asked about it.
I am suggesting that the way to deal with it is by talking openly about it.
I am suggesting that although understandable, Wiggins didn't deal with the situation in a good way.
Really? So you think it's okay for so-called 'die-hard cycling fans' to direct suspicion at someone without even the slightest suggestion of wrongdoing?
It's understandable that they do, after 100 + years of doping in cycling, He needs to deal with it in a better way.
Dont patronise us for disagreeing with you as it makes you look like those naughty words brad used
Is it any wonder we end up with such terrible sports interviews and such media savvy politicians if [some]people get upset when someone actually says what they think when asked a question.
Why ask him a question if you dont want to know what he thinks?
His team has a press team just ask them
Did you drop your cross-stitching, splutter on your Lady Grey then faint when you heard that combination of letters you hear god knows how many times a day? 😉
Ok I give up.
He's our hero and can do no wrong. 🙄
Not on the subject of doping, but maybe on topic re swearing...
Binners - you ever do the thurs night rides from the Hare & Hounds?
I went last week and am attempting to continue this trend. Couple of hours ride with pub afterwards.
He then moves over to the road in a team that has always been proudly clean
Well:
FdJ - Some concerns about systematic doping (centrifuges in trucks, vague as hell comments from the DS)
Cofidis - Systematic doping
Team High Road - Obviously we all know where they came from
I don't think Bradley is doping at all but if you can find a single team that has a full roster of riders beyond (reasonable) suspicion I would be shocked. It's a problem with cycling in general and we're getting further from that but it's inevitable it will come up.
Bradley needs to find a better way to say "I don't want to talk about doping" than calling people ****s.
Swearing?
He's a mod; they're [i]supposed[/i] to swear.
But swearing is big and clever! Everybody knows that, you ****! 😉
Brads role-model perhaps......
[img] 
[/img]
PL - not been out on a Thursday with the H&H lot. Though I keep saying I'm going to have to get out with them. You around this week? Rivi Wednesday?
Bradley needs to find a better way to say "I don't want to talk about doping" than calling people ****.
yes not answering the question would disuade the doubters ..he needs to say what he said without swearing or not. I assume it is ok in a room fuill of adults wher eit is not being broadcast life..probably better to not do it from the podium whilst getting yellow
[i]probably better to not do it from the podium whilst getting yellow[/i]
Which is all I was trying to say!
You can't have the leader of an avowedly anti-doping team who says jeff off everytime he's asked about it. It's been a large part of the sport, he needs to get more able to deal with it.
He's our hero and can do no wrong
I think the fact that he hasn't actually done anything wrong is the whole bloody point!!! I
Just put yourself in his place, and imagine how you'd feel. You reach the goal you've always strived towards, that you'd sacrificed so much to achieve, then at that - your proudest moment - people are whispering dismissively behind their hands - certainly not to your face - and certainly without a single shred of evidence - that you only got there by cheating
I'd be swearing too!! Its not only a personal insult, but an attack on his integrity! And therefore it perfectly justifiably got the response that it did! And whats more; its refreshing in the mind-numbingly tedious, bland, anodyne, PR controlled, personality vacuum that is modern sport, to see someone register a bit of human emotion. Bloody good luck to him!
"...and then if they ask about doping, call them cs and w***s, trust me, it'll work a treat"...
[img] 
[/img]
(idea and picture from cyclingnews.com)
The press found it funny and tbh WTF is the point asking him what folk on twitter said - is that great journalism and a great question?
+1
I like it but he could have done it without the swearing
[img] 
[/img]
I thought he put his point of view across quite succinctly.
Binners - Can really only do one ride mid week due to danger presented by Mrs PL, so will be out Thurs. Come along if u can make it. I didn't need lights last week and we didn't get to the pub until 10pm.
I'm with Crikey.
Wiggo's outburst is not professional and seriously not cool ... this could escalated and hamper his Tour chances... silly.
If I was Evans this morn I would defo be seeing this as a "weakness" and maybe Evans will have a glimmer of light that wasn't there before.
And
He's just feeding the trolls with that outburst... never a good thing to do
Cat liked it.
[img] 
[/img]
i didnt hear anyone asking if murray only got to the wimbledon final through drugs
same really for the footballers...... tho evidently they avoid performance enhancing drugs......
Im sure brad will have a little 'media' direction on the subject now, but nice to hear honesty, and if he didnt swear most of the country would still not have heard he is winning..
i didnt hear anyone asking if murray only got to the wimbledon final through drugs
Valid point.
this could escalated and hamper his Tour chances... silly.
Can you please explain to me how on earth it could hamper his tour chances?
Calling someone a **** is now a weakness? Dear lord! Do you get out much? Or do you find the world too frightening a place, generally? 😆
Papa Laz - I may well attempt to go for the mythical two-nightride-week. We did Blackstone t'other week and only needed lights for the last descent, which kicked us out at the pub to just about catch last orders. Happy days
much more entertaining than all that SW19 event blubbing yesterday
There is a fine line between giving an honest answer, and saying something you may come to regret.
I'm not sure the likes of Anquetil or Coppi ever resorted to oaths, but they usually gave good copy.
And that's the point - be interesting always, but not ratty and controversial for the sake of it.
The righteous indignation of the trolls amuses me.
Don't be so bloody stupid! WTF has that got to do with Brad?
Well, its got quite a lot to do with 'Brad'. With both Flandis and Contador being stripped of their wins and the current investigation/allegations against Armstrong I don't think its out of the ordinary to suspect that the current leader of the TDF could be doping. I personally don't think he is, but leading what used to be a 'dopefest' of a race, you're going to have that question fired at you.
Cycling is his job - to this end I wouldn't walk into a meeting full of directors and tell them they're a bunch of w*****s for suggesting that I might do a bad job like my predecessors. Additionally, there will be a lot of youngsters who look up to people like Cav and Wiggo as role models - I'm not sure dropping the C-bomb is a particularly good example to set. Yes, be passionate about your sport but not to the extent of looking like an uncouth lout.
Dont patronise us for disagreeing with you as it makes you look like those naughty words brad used
What a stupid response. He wasn't patronising you, grow up.
"Can you please explain to me how on earth it could hamper his tour chances?"
What d'you think will happens at the press conference today?
And what are the chances that Wiggo will again get wound up by what will now be persistent questioning of the said subject?
Waste of energy, time and mental strength.
Gotta keep your eyes on the prize and not get distracted…. Lets hope he can cool down and get on the with job in hand.
Pretty unimaginative line of questioning from the journalist.
In one respect, considering recent tour history it's unsurprising that there's a lot of cynicism about. Plus, the flames have again been fanned by last weeks announcement re. Lance & his ex team-mates.
I can understand Wiggins being royally annoyed at the question & it's inferences.
Pretty polarising way of making his views known - basically "they can eff off, they're all too lazy to do anything worthwhile"
Swearing and belittling others is, in my book, a pretty poor response.
I think he was perfectly justified in saying what he said. Except for the final word and consequent strop. If he'd left it just before that and then stayed on, he'd have looked much better.
Of course, it could just be that he's exactly what people always say that they want - eg sports stars who actually speak their minds rather than boring platitudes - and with that comes the strop at the end.
Can we just get this clear. The people he was using rude words about were those actually accusing him and his team of taking drugs. Not questioning whether like his predecessors as potential tour winners he might be taking them, but openly accusing him of doing so. I think we all agree it's fair to assume that he and his team are totally clean (to his knowledge). Aren't his comments just a little bit justified? If you were in his position wouldn't you feel much the same and want to say the same as he did?
You'd all be complaining if he deflected such questions wouldn't you?
The idea that such an outburst is a weakness, or even something he'll later come to regret is quite laughable. I'm sure the Sky media people will be giving him a little bit of corrective coaching, but I can't believe anybody associated with the team is actually all that upset about him making such comments.
I liked his response, but it does seem a little silly to use such profanity in a public press conference. If it had been a one-on-one interview or in general conversation then more understandable. When I initially read the edited version I assumed he had enough restraint to say 'c0cks' which would have been bad enough, really surprised he said the other c-word in a press conference. It is possible to convey emotion without swearing - or at least moderate his swearing.
Another source of annoyance would be the way the 'accusation' was phrasd. The journo's question was a particularly spineless and cowardly one.
No direct "are you doping?" question. On no. Nothing direct like that. Instead.... more a sort of playground-style "you see that bloke over there, he said that you...."
Truly pathetic, quite frankly. He deserved being told where to get off for that alone!
He's a mod; they're supposed to [s]swear[/s] take drugs
FTFY. Oh wait...
Also lazy journalism to phrase the question in that way.
What d'you think will happens at the press conference today?And what are the chances that Wiggo will again get wound up by what will now be persistent questioning of the said subject?
You're suggesting some other journo will ask what he thinks about what somebody else has been tweeting? Or you think there will be questions about drugs he might not have got otherwise? Do join the real world.
probably better to not do it from the podium whilst getting yellowWhich is all I was trying to say!
No i literally meant on the podium as they hand him flowers i.e. not in a press conference that is not live with adults only present
this could escalated and hamper his Tour chances... silly.
You are right he swore at a press conference he has no chance of winning it now...begineers mistake.
If I was Evans this morn I would defo be seeing this as a "weakness" and maybe Evans will have a glimmer of light that wasn't there before.
Yes cuddles is know for his ability to deal with the press and the media in a humourous and light hearted manner. Why do you think he is called cuddles?
And what are the chances that Wiggo will again get wound up by what will now be persistent questioning of the said subject?Waste of energy, time and mental strength.
Not sure he was wound up but just sick of it. Equally likely he could chanel that anger into a superb TT
Overall i would rather have personalities giving actual honest answers to questions and not some media trained bat it way non response. The swearing is the only issue and I think it would have been better delivered without it.
Same thing happens whena politician gives an honest answer or ratner calls a cheap produc tat ...we cannot handle the truth from people for some reason and want anodine answers
Another source of annoyance would be the way the 'accusation' was phrasd. The journo's question was a particularly spineless and cowardly one.
Is that not the way of the media though? I don't have an issue with the message Wiggins is trying to convey - I just thought the swearing was unnecessary. This shouty sweary rockstar mentality to interviews is a bit sickening in my book. Whenever Wiggins is interviewed its always a bit butt-clenching, like watching Russell Crow being interviewed. You never know if he's going to go mental and start punching someone. Cav used to be similar, but seems to have matured a little.
Can you imagine the tantrum Wiggins would have had, had something like the Hoogerland/French TV car thing happened to him?
Can you imagine the tantrum Wiggins would have had, had something like the Hoogerland/French TV car thing happened to him?
I doubt anyone would have the wherewithal to get antsy after that!
It does ammuse me that some people are piddling themselves with offence at some fairly justified swearing, from someone who's had a completely baseless accusation of cheating lobbed at him from a lowlife hack
Could have been worse....
[img] 
[/img]
😀
This shouty sweary rockstar mentality to interviews is a bit sickening in my book.
To be fair, he does seem to believe that he's Paul Weller;)
Jeez...
It's so easy to see how people who follow cycling can go along with anything if it's about their favourite rider.
If Andy Murray had sworn at all the people who called him a dour humourless Scotsman while being interviewed at Wimbledon, or Wayne Rooney had called English fans cs and w**s we would be all over them like a rash.
Because it's the hero du jour, some folk are prepared to accept and excuse his behaviour. Nevermind all this 'How refreshing to hear a sportsman speak his mind', he didn't speak his mind, he lost the plot and resorted to swearing because he was not articulate enough to respond in another way.
He was wrong.
He was out of order, and should apologise.
If I spoke like that while at work I would be out of a job.
And whats more; its refreshing in the mind-numbingly tedious, bland, anodyne, PR controlled, personality vacuum that is modern sport, to see someone register a bit of human emotion. Bloody good luck to him!
spot on.
edit to add, for me it's nothing to do with him being a current hero and everything to do with respecting someone's ability to bluntly speak their mind in a situation like this. Censor it on the 7pm sport news but in a closed press conference it's good to see someone not being constrained by PR concerns etc.
or Wayne Rooney had called English fans cs and w**s we would be all over them like a rash.
Erm.... you watched the last World Cup, right? Particularly the Germany game? Or were you in bed with a horlicks reading your bible? Maybe google it. I'm sure you'll be as faux outraged as the other tabloid journalists, and the 3 other elderly spinsters who accidentally found themselves watching wrong channel while looking for Songs of Praise 😆
[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/sep/17/comment.charliebrooker ]you do not have the right not to be offended[/url]
I hate offended people. They come in two flavours - huffy and whiny - and it's hard to know which is worst. The huffy ones are self-important, narcissistic authoritarians in love with the sound of their own booming disapproval, while the whiny, sparrowlike ones are so annoying and sickly and ill-equipped for life on Earth you just want to smack them round the head until they stop crying and grow up. Combined, they're the very worst people on the planet - 20 times worse than child molesters, and I say that not because it's true (it isn't), but because it'll upset them unnecessarily, and these readers deserve to be upset unnecessarily, morning, noon and night, every sodding day, for the rest of their wheedling lives.Note I used the word "sodding" there, because even though every single one of you knows precisely what word I meant to use, I'm not allowed to use it in print in case the whiny/huffy Axis of Feeble decides to piddle its pants with dismay at the sight of a commonplace assembly of letters. And they must be appeased at all times.
What these nitpicky, sexless complainists fail to realise is that sweary tastelessness is a celebration of life, as soaring and majestic as a gospel choir in full flow, and no amount of tedious squeamishness can alter that. Potentially offended reader - you are the offence. In fact you're a four-letter word beginning with "c" and ending in "t". Yes. That's right. You're an absolute clot.
Could have been worse....
Yes, but that's football and everyone knows football is rubbish. I just don't think that type of language in a press conference is necessary.
Hacks in general tend to be low-lives. Especially those who work for the gutter press, wanting to catch a headline or snippet for publications where the consumers have little awareness of cycling other than 'doesn't that American bloke who married Sheryl Crow do that?'. If these questions are bad now, they're going to be a whole heap worse if/when he wins it. Even one of our Olympic team is an ex-doper so its an easy win for a journo looking for a sound-byte to slip in tomorrows Sun/Mirror/Daily Wail. (I'm not trying to be contrary BTW, even though it looks like it).
I'm all for frank and fair responses, just sans swearing....
If Andy Murray had sworn at all the people who called him a dour humourless Scotsman while being interviewed at Wimbledon, or Wayne Rooney had called English fans cs and w**s we would be all over them like a rash.
Yes, they're perfect analogies for being accused of being a drugs cheat.
BTW - I'm not totally against swearing. I always pray for Randy De Puniet to win/podium in a Moto GP race just to you can hear him swearing in the post race conference.....hilarious
Brailsford has added his 2p worth:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/tour-de-france/9386218/Tour-de-France-2012-Bradley-Wiggins-rant-about-those-sullying-his-name-were-justified-says-Sky-team-principal.html
[i] An open letter to the peloton
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because it's become abundantly clear that the pro-peloton are aware of us;
More accurately, dear people applauding Bradley Wiggins for his foul-mouthed tirade today:
I'd like to outline why I think you're all massive hypocrites, and why you get the reaction from people that you do.
We've sat by for years - for some of you, your entire professional careers - and watched the sport.
We've sat through almost 30 years of doped riders, of positive tests, of confiscated victories weeks, months and sometimes years after they were awarded.
But most importantly, we sat by whilst all of this was going on, and you did nothing.
You didn't speak out then.
You didn't speak up against people you knew were doping.
You didn't speak up against your teammates when you knew they were doping.
All you ex-T-mobile riders didn't say anything about the visits to Freiberg.
You didn't say anything when riders gave evidence about what they'd seen, and were harassed because of it.
Some of you, through your inaction, did nothing about that harassment. Those of you who raced with Lance Armstrong said nothing back then.
Those of you who raced in 1998 complained about your rights and your dignity.
You didn't complain about those people who stripped them from you by cheating.
You didn't applaud those people who tried to out the real cheats within the ranks.
You didn't chastise those people taking trips to Spain and Italy to see doctors. In fact, some of you did it yourself.
You complained about early morning drug tests.
You complained about out of competition drug tests, and you complained about whereabouts forms and not having a private life, and media intrusion.
And some of you still ride today, still having said nothing about doping.
I'll say this: I've sat up until 3 in the morning every July for countless years now. I've watched, I've supported, even some of you who turned out to be cheats. I've dreamed of being in the position you're in, of having a tenth of the talent you're blessed enough to have, because no amount of hard work will make up for the gap. So when I'm at work at 7am, busting my rear end to make ends meet for the next ten hours for a tiny bit of what you get, remember this, every one of you who applaud Wiggins abusing those of us who ask questions:
We ask the questions because you refused to.
We get suspicious because we're tired of seeing more than half of the last 13 TdF titles get stripped and re-awarded.
We're tired of you guys continually saying "We're clean" and then seeing someone test positive.
We're tired of seeing you complain about us, because we got tired of seeing you cheat us as fans, by not taking matters into your own hands, getting rid of - and speaking out against - those who are doping, and have doped.
You give your blood values and power numbers happily to the ASO, and treat us with contempt, like we're just supposed to watch, buy your sponsor's products, and cheer on demand.
You do nothing to dispel doping suspicions, to out cheats, and to clean up the sport. You are the blight on the sport, not us.[/i]
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=17734
Procyclists who throw their toys out of the pram when drugs get mentioned need to have a wee word with themselves.
Matt Rendell has just confirmed that the quote will be played back (bleeped) on ITV's live coverage this afternoon. Might tune in just for that.
Apparently this is an audio recording of Wiggo's press conference, but I can't get it to play:
http://drupal-sporten.tv2.dk/tour/2012-07-09-lydfil-her-sviner-wiggins-sine-kritikere