daydream time - ult...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] daydream time - ultralight fat bike frame?

26 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
67 Views
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

What is there?...s/h beargrease, anyone doing anything in ti? Could the chinese custom ti guys do one?


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 9:47 am
Posts: 4315
Free Member
 

Quite a few ti ones out there - google is your friend.


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 9:49 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Loads of the Chinese guys are doing carbon ones too. Super light and ti... Not a combination I'd go with.


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 9:53 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I saw a chinese one on't'bay for £400...I know some have got on fine with unbranded ones, but there have been some fails also?


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 9:56 am
 Andy
Posts: 3337
Full Member
 

Was musing along the same lines; for me needs to be

4" fat
29er +
Threaded bb
44mm headtube
Singlespeed capable

which my mukluk currently covers! Not sure how much lighter a carbon/ti frame would be...


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:12 am
 cozz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

for me id go

borealis (not got)
9zero7 whiteout (want)
or carver ti o'beast (got)


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:13 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I know some have got on fine with unbranded ones, but there have been some fails also?

Is that a question, or a statement? I've not seen a broken one, but I've not looked. I didnt say unbranded anyway - Light Bicycle, Carbonality, Flyxii etc all do fat bikes now IIRC


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:16 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Is that a question, or a statement?

Feeling pedantic today? Have a coffee.


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:26 am
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

I'm a little concerned that ultra-lightweight and no suspension could be problematic, but teamed up with even front suspension it would be great.

I'm already thinking about Ti fatbikes suitable for 26x4 and 27.5x3


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:35 am
 Andy
Posts: 3337
Full Member
 

I'm already thinking about Ti fatbikes suitable for 26x4 and 27.5x3

The Travers does look good!


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 10:37 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ultra-lightweight and no suspension could be problematic

Why? I don't see why 1.5kg alu frame shouldn't be straightforward. The riding style and 4" tyres mean peak loads will be lower.


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 11:20 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Feeling pedantic today? Have a coffee.

I'm pedantic every day Al! I was being serious though, wasn't sure if it was a question, I've not seen a broken one.


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 1:24 pm
 akak
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think a Trek Farley 6 is pretty light, I don't know about ultralight. Isn't it lighter wheels that you really want anyway, which the Canyon fatbike coming next year will have?


 
Posted : 04/10/2014 1:35 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

😀 @ njee

Isn't it lighter wheels that you really want anyway, which the Canyon fatbike coming next year will have?

How so?


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 6:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

was going this route but at time unable to supply bolt though fork. so went for the beargrease which i will keep ridged. on the wish list now is a 180mm fs fattie funbike

http://www.lamerecycles.com/#!fatbike/c1ff7


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 7:18 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

njee20 - Member
Light Bicycle, Carbonality, Flyxii etc all do fat bikes now IIRC

No, none of them do.


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 12:26 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Nor does XACD 🙁


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 12:39 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

That's weird, could've sworn I'd seen them.


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The Borealis Yampa is 3.1lb not a lot will be lighter than that. Add some HED rims and you're in the sub 24lb complete bike region.


 
Posted : 05/10/2014 1:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Demo Beargrease @ Bike City in Wells, medium I believe too
Been there a while so I think they want to sell it on


 
Posted : 09/10/2014 10:24 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

Canyon?

The weights they quoted for the bikes were 11.8kg for the rigid bikes and 12.9kg for the Bluto-equipped


 
Posted : 09/10/2014 10:27 pm
Posts: 6686
Free Member
 

Rode with some folk who had a mix of bikes and the Ti Linskey was heavier than the Carbon Beargrease. Admittedly, these were full builds having different rims and build kits. Personally I would take a Beargrease or Yampa, preferring a carbon frame, but obviously what is attached to it will make a massive difference.


 
Posted : 10/10/2014 6:23 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Not surprising. The Beargrease is light, lighter frame than my Superfly.


 
Posted : 10/10/2014 6:35 am
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

So how about; who makes a VERY light Single Speed Fatbike, 65mm rims, will do..........


 
Posted : 10/10/2014 7:42 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.yishunbike.com/yishunbike-fm079-bb30bsa-26er-snowbikefatbike-carbon-bicycle-frame-p-1218.html ]1150g[/url], dunno about price.


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 10:52 am
Posts: 12467
Full Member
 

gee on here was raving about how much difference his carbon rims made.
Salsa beargrease, don't know if the tyres were especailly lightweight, but he was using words like gamechanger. So budget for some of them, will probably make more difference than half a kilo on the frame.

google "singletrackworld gee elite race fatbike carbon" you should find the thread.

Edit: there you go:
http://www.xcracer.com/big-dog-and-elite-fatbike-double-header.html


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 11:29 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

His Beargrease is really nice, it feels a lot quicker than it looks like it should!


 
Posted : 04/12/2014 11:31 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!