cotic escapade fork...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] cotic escapade forks?

26 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
142 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

what are the forks cotic escapade like? I was thinking of buying the escapade frame and fitting kinesis dc37 disc forks.. but this might be a bonkers idea

I don't know if the kinesis dc37 disc forks forks will shave enough weight to be worth it (?)


 
Posted : 25/03/2014 9:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on the rest of the build. If your paying a fortune on carbon bits n bobs would make sense. If there's more emphasis on comfort then steel forks are a much nicer ride ime, worth the weight penalty.


 
Posted : 25/03/2014 9:36 pm
Posts: 43345
Full Member
 

If I was concerned about weight I wouldn't be buying that frame.


 
Posted : 25/03/2014 9:37 pm
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

Indeed, nor would I adorn it with bike jewellery either. I can't help but feel Cotic have missed a trick here. Why no 853? If they can do the Soul for £500?

The gas pipe is not what I want. And I wouldnt pay £329 for it for the reason above.

You can get a Kaffenback2 for £250.00


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 12:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why no 853? If they can do the Soul for £500?

For some reason, as soon as you put 853 into a road/cx frame, the price sky rockets compared to the mtb equivalent. I'd love to know the reason why.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Road 853 are typically ALL 853 tubes. Unlike MTB frames where the 853 sticker usually means only a few tubes are 853. So the comparison is not equal.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 8:01 am
Posts: 27
Full Member
 

The current Soul only has 2 x 853 tubes, doesn't it?


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 8:04 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

But it says Cotic on the downtube! This stops it being a dull overpriced heavy hybrid. 🙄


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 8:07 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

The gas pipe is not what I want. And I wouldnt pay £329 for it for the reason above.

What defines gas pipe?

Anything that isn't Reynolds 853+? For example is the Croix De Fer using 725 gas pipe?

/curious


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 8:07 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

What defines gas pipe?

For me anything that's not oversize O/D and thicker than .8-.5-.8 butted main tubes.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 8:52 am
Posts: 30093
Full Member
 

[b]Merak[/b], the Escapade frame (without forks) is £249, so half the price of the Soul frame.
Doubling the price of the Escapade would put it out of the reach of many of us for the kind of bike it is.

Tubing wise... lots going on with the latest version of the [b]Fe[/b] tubeset on this and the new Roadrat.
Side by side with my old Roadrat from a few years ago, only the seattube looked to be similar size/shape wise.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 9:10 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

So how would one find out stuff like pipe thickness? For example, Cotic just list their material as 'Custom butted Cotic Fe Cromoly'.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 9:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Jamie - Member

What defines gas pipe?

Anything that isn't Reynolds 853+? For example is the Croix De Fer using 725 gas pipe?

Keep up grandad. It's all about 953 now - Even 853 is just crappy cheapskate gas pipe.

Anything less than 953 and the cool kids won't talk to you.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 10:33 am
Posts: 65918
Free Member
 

Jamie - Member

So how would one find out stuff like pipe thickness?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 10:36 am
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

853 would have been nice is all. We are all happy to pay the money for the Soul. It would have been the same with the Escapade.

Its not a budget bike for most people likely to buy it. The frame and fork are being built up with say King headset, and maybe 105 or Rival or equivalent. Maybe some nice wheels just like the Soul. I'm not being unrealistic there, check the forums to see what folk are building.

I'd want my frame a bit lighter is all. If there were an 853 version it'd be just as popular as the Soul I'd imagine.

See the Genesis day one frame for example.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 12:56 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Anything less than 953 and the cool kids won't talk to you.

Not a problem. Cool kids haven't spoke to me for a while now 🙁


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Merak, there are not many steel disc frames under 2kg bare frame weight, irrespective of price. Its a strength issue not a weight thing.

"So, the Soul uses oversize sections in similar wall thickness to any other steel XC frame. What does that get you? Huge strength and longevity for a similar weight to other frames out there. But lets put that into context for a moment. To get the same strength, stiffness and fatigue resistance as the Soul out of a frame made from regular cromoly, it would be nearly 0.5lb heavier than the Soul due to thicker tube walls."

Blurb from cotic site, so basically you dont need the same strength on a road/cx as the Soul, so no net weight difference really.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:02 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

853 would have been nice is all

Without you knowing the actual specs of the tubeset used is this not a little bit of a pointless statement?

You want 853 because....? because it's 853 and this frame isn't?

Or because you know it would be X% better(?!), Xg lighter, and Y% nicer to ride?

I think far too many people get hung up on having a particular tubeset/sticker (or even partial tubeset in a lot of cases) without actually knowing much about the differences and whether or not it will make any noticeable difference.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:07 pm
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

What's the bare frame weight of the Escapade? I can't see a figure on the website.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:08 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

Can't see if on the website either, but I wouldn't go on website weights anyway.

[url= http://singletrackmag.com/forum/topic/cotic-escapade-arrived-built ]this guy weighed his[/url] medium/56 at 2060g


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:14 pm
 td75
Posts: 333
Free Member
 

Personally I'm not bothered what it's made of. But please either offer vertical dropouts or paragon sliding dropouts. I'd happily pay more for paragon sliding dropouts. Frame would be perfect for my needs then.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:15 pm
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

I wouldn't go on kitchen scales weight either.

Id like to know definitively though.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:17 pm
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

#devils avocate It will never be all things to all people, its snobbery on my part.

Would like that weight figure though.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:19 pm
Posts: 41642
Free Member
 

I wouldn't go on kitchen scales weight either.

2060g is 2x the weight of a comparably priced carbon chinese frame. Why are you quibling over whether the scales were accurate to +/-5g? Do you need an uptodate calibration certificate to tell you that if you're worried about weight, it's definately not the kind of bike for you.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:22 pm
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

Just wanted to know rather than speculate. Got an hour to kill, bit of baiting you understand.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:26 pm
Posts: 80
Free Member
 

Well 'in the region of 2kg' is about as good as you're ever gonna get without calibration certificates for every set of scales used when a person says 'mine weighed X' 🙂

as TINAS says, it's not light compared to Carbon (or even Alu), but then it's not really a comparable product and not being sold on its weight.


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 1:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

blimey this one (thread) took a new course 😆


 
Posted : 26/03/2014 9:13 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!