commencal frames
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] commencal frames

26 Posts
14 Users
0 Reactions
84 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

hi STWers....i could do with a bit of advice on a couple of frames i'm considering getting

currently looking at a 2010 commencal furious and a 2009 commencal supreme

has anyone ever owned one of these and can give me some insight into how they are? anything to look out for? any problems issues such as frames cracking etc that i should be aware of?

thanks in advance.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 12:18 pm
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

Might be where you're already looking, but there are some very cheap ones on the Commencal Outlet store.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 12:41 pm
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

That model set is all very very crackproof, it was only the Meta/Super4 range really.

Mate has a Furious and it's built very well.

I've had a meta, super4 and now a MetaAM29


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 12:43 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

Crack proof - youre 'avin a laff!


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 12:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a supreme 6 for a while. Excellent DH bike. I'd happily recommend it or it's bigger brothers.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 1:14 pm
Posts: 3773
Free Member
 

No wysiwyg he isn't,,supremes and furious didn't crack
Although a few of that age Furious's had odd issues with poor alignment of the shock mount


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Crack proof - youre 'avin a laff!

wysiwyg - i think i recall seeing a post where you mentioned that you were aware of frame cracking issues (a la lapierre) on the 08/09 supremes models...can you shed any more light on this?


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it was only the Meta/Super4 range really

And the Ramones range

The op's Furious & Supreme frames have exactly the same kind of seat/top tube junction as my old Ramones whereas the newer frames have exactly the same kind of modified seat/top tube junction as my new Ramones

Just saying like


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

rocketman - does that mean they could potentially develop a crack/failure at that position?


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:01 pm
Posts: 53
Free Member
 

i Have a brand new furrious frame if you want but it has no shock


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:03 pm
Posts: 3806
Free Member
 

I've had a 08 Meta 5.5.2 XT since 09.
Been up and down Snowdon, Helvellyn, Antur Stiniog, Peaks, Lakes, usual trail centres and locally.
It will be accompanying me to the Alps next summer too.
No cracks and it's ridden pretty hard and I'm a big lad 😉


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:04 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

supremes and furious didn't crack

Nope, no Supreme's cracked. Ever*

*Much.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quite a few friends had the Furious and pretty much all of them decided that for jumping they were really good but couldn't touch the Supreme (and Mini DH) for actual DH performance as they "rode a bit weird".
Ime say pick the Supreme (the FR or DH version) over the Furious as the only person that seemed to like it was Cedric Gracia (who had a lot of input in the design) all the other sponsored riders seemed to avoid it.

My bro's 2007 Supreme is still going strong and pedals well for a 40lb bike (nota light build)

Tom KP


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

my other (pricier) option is to go for an Intense slopestyle so any advice/feedback in a similar way would be appreciated


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 2:18 pm
Posts: 357
Free Member
 

All my 2010/9 supreme frames cracked around the top tube seat tube weld. I say all. They gave up replacing them once the first ones warranty was up. After that I broke two linkages on cracked frames.

Barge pole touch


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

does that mean they could potentially develop a crack/failure at that position?

as above

Personally I would not buy any Commencal from that period


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 3:24 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I was looking at the Meta AM and Meta Hip Hop recently (CRC doing good prices). They are ****IN heavy 😯 amazed because my Santa Cruz Butcher is a good 1.5lb lighter.

The last/later Meta 5.5's that didnt crack were built too heavy to be fun.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 3:27 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7181
Free Member
 

I've got a Meta SL and don't have any issue with the frame weight. Ride it at welsh trail centres and also did a 10k climb in Spain on it and had no issues.


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 3:36 pm
Posts: 3773
Free Member
 

Really hora
You must have been riding it wrong 😉

The Ramones wasn't released in 2009, it came out in 2010 a good while after the issues with quality where addressed by moving factory


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 8:19 pm
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

I've done 60 mile days on my metaAM.

Heavy it is, fun too though.

I think I've done 2000 miles on it this year


 
Posted : 20/11/2014 9:40 pm
Posts: 2881
Free Member
 

Here's my old Supreme,which was absolutely phenomenal:

[URL= http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt82/mark2404/MarksIphone22_01_12043.jp g" target="_blank">http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt82/mark2404/MarksIphone22_01_12043.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

easily had the best grip of any DH bike I've had.


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 12:44 am
Posts: 2881
Free Member
 

And here's my old Meta which I didn't really get on with (I bought the wrong size - the suspension was impeccable):

[URL= http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt82/mark2404/C8E9E6AB-DB86-4EEC-BDD1-A49DA5C51F4E_zpsxd0feyve.jp g" target="_blank">http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt82/mark2404/C8E9E6AB-DB86-4EEC-BDD1-A49DA5C51F4E_zpsxd0feyve.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 12:52 am
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

[URL= http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/bike/P100107_075717.jp g" target="_blank">http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/bike/P100107_075717.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/Commencal/SwinleyForestJune2014197_zpsa340cc6d.jp g" target="_blank">http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/Commencal/SwinleyForestJune2014197_zpsa340cc6d.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

[URL= http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/Commencal/P100106_122858.jp g" target="_blank">http://i248.photobucket.com/albums/gg167/weeksy59/Commencal/P100106_122858.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 8:19 am
Posts: 13771
Free Member
 

Where's the picture in the middle from weaksy?


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 9:16 am
Posts: 2881
Free Member
 

The last/later Meta 5.5's that didnt crack were built too heavy to be fun.

Not so sure about that. The blue one above was the last Meta 55 and in that guise it weighed under 30lb (granted, not by a lot).


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 9:16 am
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

honourablegeorge - Member

Where's the picture in the middle from weaksy?

Swinley Jump Gully.


 
Posted : 21/11/2014 9:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

thats a horrible front mudguard you got there Weeksy!! 😉


 
Posted : 26/11/2014 3:39 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!