Chain Wear Tools
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

Chain Wear Tools

15 Posts
13 Users
3 Reactions
1,182 Views
Posts: 75
Free Member
Topic starter
 

For many years I had a chain checking tool that had two prongs to grip a roller and another curved pin that inserted into the gap between rollers about 6 inches away. You could monitor the wear progress depending on how far the pin went in and it was double sided to give you up to 0.75 percent or 1 percent wear. Very quick and easy to use, but after reading various articles on how inaccurate many are, I bought what was supposed to be the most accurate type, a Pedros II (same design as a Park Tool CC4).

I have persevered with the Pedro's for 5 years now and I'm just not convinced it is more accurate and it is certainly a lot more difficult to use. According to the instructions you have to insert pin 1, then 2 and the final pin 3 is what you measure from. I have found that it is very sensitive to how much you push in pin 2 as to the reading you get in pin 3. If I push in firmly it will say the chain has no wear, but on my original chain checker it will suggest something around 0.5%. If I take the chain off and compare to a new chain, there is clearly wear on the chain, so I have now lost confidence in what are supposed to be the most accurate chain checkers.

What are other peoples experiences? Is there a specific technique to the Pedro's type beyond the instructions?

 
Posted : 21/04/2025 7:56 pm
Posts: 8612
Full Member
 

I tend to use the most recent version of the Park Tools one (which does 0.75/0.5 mm wear) and I’ve not had any issues with that.

I do have a pretty half-hearted approach to maintenance though.

 
Posted : 21/04/2025 8:02 pm
chakaping reacted
Posts: 203
Free Member
 

I've got one of the Pedro ones coming as its one of the few sram says works with their axs flat top chains.

I "think" you have to push pin 2 in quite firmly as that is what forces the pins and rollers together at one side to then measure the wear at pin 3?

Apparently you are supposed to measure it when the chain is stripped for re lubing, especially if its a waxed chain as the solid wax in the rollers can prevent the rollers and pins from pushing right against each other.

 
Posted : 21/04/2025 8:36 pm
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

I've four in the measuring draw if the tool chest. 

Rohloff caliber

Park CC4

Abbey Bike Tools LLC

600mm steel rule with markers to measure the longest length possible.

I find the Park and Rohloff are both pessimistic but I guess that's the better way to have it. Not warm a chain out since getting the abbey Bike tools but when any get close I check them against the steel rule for the final verdict.

 
Posted : 21/04/2025 8:59 pm
Posts: 7086
Full Member
 

I have the Pedro chain checker, too. Agree that it needs pushing hard to make sure the first two pins operate correctly.

 
Posted : 21/04/2025 11:43 pm
 mert
Posts: 3831
Free Member
 

I have a crappy park one. Measure the chain whenever it goes up on the stand. Then when it shows that the chain is worn, i switch to a steel rule. Which i have in the workshop anyway.

 

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 6:41 am
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

Posted by: Onzadog

check them against the steel rule

(tension clean unwaxed chain over a decent length and measure against a rule.  Hell, use a caliper if you want).  I don't but surely that's the "best" *

 

* Best really is the one you use most reliably and most often.  For me that's shoving in a cheap one and seeing what happens.  Even the supposedly discredited simple ones will tell you that things are getting slack/funny and then maybe you measure properly

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 8:28 am
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

I tend to use the most recent version of the Park Tools one (which does 0.75/0.5 mm wear) and I’ve not had any issues with that.

Same.

But what do we use to check the wear on our chain checkers, eh?

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 10:39 am
 Yak
Posts: 6920
Full Member
 

I have an old CC2, but that doesn't measure roller to roller on the same side of each roller. It only measures inside to inside. But it's good enough and seems to more or less correlate with whether I have caught it time for a chain only swap or not. I know it's not flat-top chain compatible, but I haven't got any of those for now. 

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 11:05 am
Posts: 525
Free Member
 

Big article on measuring chain wear (paywalled, think you can read one story for free though).

 

https://escapecollective.com/threaded-24-a-modern-guide-to-measuring-chain-wear/

 

 

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 11:06 am
Posts: 2304
Full Member
 

Chain waxers like me, who just throw the chain in a pot of wax when it needs redoing and don't take all the old wax off first, how do you measure chain wear? Hopefully not the same way as me (ie, you don't 😊)

 

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 11:16 am
Posts: 21461
Full Member
 

If you want to remove the wax to check chain length, I have a small milk pan that I will boil the chain in to remove the wax. Also use it after really dirty rides so I'm not contaminating the wax pot.

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 11:36 am
ossify reacted
Posts: 7954
Full Member
 

Posted by: chakaping

But what do we use to check the wear on our chain checkers, eh?

New chains, hth 😂

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 11:50 am
chakaping reacted
Posts: 75
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks all. I reckon I'm going to have to invest in a steel rule and then start doing my own calibrations. The Pedro's one just seems too technique sensitive compared to others. I don't buy that simply tools don't work for two reasons 1) pin and roller wear is most likely symmetrical and 2) you can compensate for that in the cheaper tool.

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 2:14 pm
 IHN
Posts: 19694
Full Member
 

Posted by: ossify

Chain waxers like me, who just throw the chain in a pot of wax when it needs redoing and don't take all the old wax off first, how do you measure chain wear? Hopefully not the same way as me (ie, you don't 😊)

I keep meaning to buy a chain checker, but then I've been saying that since, er, 1995. I think they're one of those things that logically have a use, but practically don't actually matter.

 
Posted : 22/04/2025 2:35 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!