cars still over tak...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] cars still over taking when your signalling right ?

83 Posts
48 Users
0 Reactions
197 Views
Posts: 214
Free Member
Topic starter
 

where does the law stand on this ? 👿


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:05 am
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

No

But if they cant see you... yes.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Happened to me this morning on the commute. 😡

Arm out, signaling right, checked behind and started to slowly move across then realised the car behind wasn't intent on stopping. Just got out of it in time. The car was clearly in a desperate rush to join the back of the next traffic que.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:22 am
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

I try not to force my way across traffic when turning right, take primary position nice and early and you shouldn't have too many issues


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:28 am
Posts: 195
Free Member
 

I had a go at some pikey yesterday who pulled out on me (forced me onto opposite lane)only to park up 10m later.

Preceeded by getting McDonalds ketchup thrown at me from a van earlier in the day.

I'm going to wrap my lock around someones head this week- i can feel it

Deep breaths


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about cars which over take, realise that you are going a little fast than they thought, finally make the move and take a left turning performing a hard stop in front of you, making you do the same!? 👿


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do you not do it the same as you would were you driving?

If I want to turn right I look nice and early and wait for a reasonable gap then signal and move across so that I'm in the correct lane/side of the road waaay before I actually need to turn. A bit like defensive driving.

Despite many issues with car drivers this paticular part of road riding never seems to cause an issue.
I dont ever expect to just signal and move out into oncoming traffic though, just as I wouldnt were i driving.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 10:36 am
Posts: 214
Free Member
Topic starter
 

If I want to turn right I look nice and early and wait for a reasonable gap then signal and move across so that I'm in the correct lane/side of the road waaay before I actually need to turn. A bit like defensive driving.

what if there is no gap ?


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about cars which over take, realise that you are going a little fast than they thought, finally make the move and take a left turning performing a hard stop in front of you, making you do the same!?

INCREDIBLY annoying and very stupid. Happens far too often.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:04 am
 mrmo
Posts: 10687
Free Member
 

all i can add to this is the general stupidity of some drivers, tractor-trailer in righthand lane at a roundabout indicating to turn left (very tight corner) car goes up left of car and is surprised when the trailer crunches their bonnet.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:08 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

where does the law stand on this ?
That the driver is an impatient asshat?

Yes ride defensivley, maintain primary position yadda yadda so it doesn't happen but at somepoint in your road riding life chances are you are going to have to look for a gap, signal, start to move over and when you do some twunt will be there to overtake you.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:14 am
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

what if there is no gap ?

I can see this being an issue if you have to turn right on a busy A road, where the traffic is moving much faster than you. In a normal urban 30mph zone I've never know it to be an issue, the traffic is maybe only travelling 5-10mph faster than me (if that). In this situation take the lane early and make your intentions clear.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:22 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

sofaking - Member
where does the law stand on this ?

I don't think there is any "courtesy law"

My fave signalling right moment - road has a cycle lane, so ride on this, then signal after the last junction before mine, gives cars plenty of warning and me time to look over shoulder, move out - normally someone slows and lets me across (and they get a thumb up from my signalling hand).
This one time (at bandcamp) I stick my arm out, look over the shoulder, see a red car with no intention of slowing, keep the arm out, WHACK! the old f~*ker drives into my hand!!


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:26 am
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

Had this last night, stupid WHORE in a lexus, ****ing bitch.

I wasnt pleased at all. Signalling for a while and started to move out and she came speeding up and slammed her horn on, I slowed and was ready to ask her what the issue was and she sped off.

The UK driver has a SHOCKING attitude to cyclists - simple. Its mostly because we dont fine RLJ ****s or ****ers who think its acceptable to cycle on the pavement.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This one time (at bandcamp) I stick my arm out, look over the shoulder, see a red car with no intention of slowing, keep the arm out, WHACK! the old f~*ker drives into my hand!!

[b]Look, signal, manoeuvre[/b]. What you're saying is: [b]signal, look, bang![/b] Back to a driving school, I'm afraid.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

The UK driver has a SHOCKING attitude to [s]cyclists [/s] poor driving- simple. Its mostly because we [s]dont fine RLJ * or * who think its acceptable to cycle on the pavement.[/s] tolerate all sorts of traffic offences whether it be drivers or cyclists


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:37 am
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

True Thom. This week I have almost been taken out 3 times by women messing about on their phones, or messing about with makeup. When is there a copper when you need one?


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:40 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

I don't think there is any "courtesy law"
What about when you are slightly right of centre of the lane (you don't wanna leave the gate open for numb nuts who are also going right undertaking you then cutting you up) and they still overtake?

What you're saying is: signal, look, bang! Back to a driving school, I'm afraid.
possibly but if the driver was giving as much room as he should he wouldn't have hit DezBs arm.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ride along out of the gutter - it makes carts overtake you properly rather than let them squeeze past. They have to pull out to get past.

A way back from he junction start checking for gap where the cars are not nose to tail - see one, signal right - stare at the driver of the car behind untill you are sure they have seen you and are letting you out. Then pull out with a cheery wave to the driver.

Some will be ****s and cointine to pass in their haste to get to teh next jam - ignore them, laugh at them. They are not putting you in danger as you should be watching them.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you are ready in position to turn right ie a few feet inside the centre line then they are utter idiots and I would have thought reckless driving at best.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:45 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]Look, signal, manoeuvre. What you're saying is: signal, look, bang! Back to a driving school, I'm afraid.[/i]

Eh? So, because I don't type up the events exactly verbatim, you presume I'm in the f&&*ing wrong. Jeez. Won't be giving you the link to the Massive Attack mix that's for sure!


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:46 am
 trb
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to have one particulary bad juntion for this where I'd signal right, take up correct road position and people would overtake me [b]while signalling to turn left at the roundabout.[/b]

As this was on the way home from work at 5pm, I can only assume they were driving in fear of missing the start of Countdown or some such emergency

The key is to get into the correct/prime/assertive road position so that the they have to go around you, then the highway code says it's encumbent on them to make sure it's safe before they overtake (or words to that effect)


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:47 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]possibly but if the driver was giving as much room as he should he wouldn't have hit DezBs arm.[/i]

Right - I'm in a cycle lane, he has plenty of time, space and warning to see me and my signal. I negotiate the same junction almost daily, so I think I know the safe way to approach the bloody manoeuvre!


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:50 am
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

got a right turn on my regular commute, the approach is single lane either side massive chevron section in the middle, then a right filter lane. If I ride primary on the approach cars overtake me on the chevrons and block me in. If I ride the chevrons I get undertaken by right turners. Can't win.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 11:58 am
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

The highway code states that when overtaking a cyclist you give them the same room as you would a parked car.

Does this happen?

Pffft NEVER!


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:02 pm
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

Another quote from the highway code

212
When passing motorcyclists and cyclists, give them plenty of room (see Rules 162-167). If they look over their shoulder it could mean that they intend to pull out, turn right or change direction. Give them time and space to do so.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:06 pm
 ibis
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

To be honest iI dont have much respect for most road riders, even though i ride myself I see a lot of stupid things.
One guy recently got knocked off in front of me as the car in front was indicating to turn left doing 20mph and the roadie was overtaking him at the same time down the left hand side on his car.
He got up and started raving on at the driver.
A week later I watched the same guy weaving in and out of traffic at the same place.
Good and bad and stupidity in everone on the road. 😕


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As this was on the way home from work at [b]5pm[/b], I can only assume they were driving in fear of missing the [b]start of Countdown[/b] or some such emergency

were they driving a DeLorean ? 😉


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:15 pm
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

Ibis, Ive seen that so much.

It annoys me when cars overtake and then turn left, knowing full well the cyclist is there. But when the car is infront and signalling to turn left, the cyclist has to be respectful and aware of whats going on in front. Yes the driver should check their mirrors, and act accordingly, but in that situation, I always slow down let the car go.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:16 pm
Posts: 6690
Free Member
 

Ride along out of the gutter - it makes carts overtake you properly rather than let them squeeze past. They have to pull out to get past.

i've found it makes no difference to how close they overtake, just gives you somewhere to go when they overtake too close.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DezB, how about hooking up with a local Bikeability trainer for a quick session? I rode in London and its suburbs for years without bother, others have too. If you ride in a cycle lane you're asking for trouble to begin with. It's one of those things that the Highway Code has wrong (another one is you are to ride in the left-most lane all around the roundabout regardless where you are exiting but you must signal all the time), don't use it, ride your bike as if it were a motorbike. And get trained, ok checked.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It certainly gives you that as well. I do find it makes a difference tho.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:18 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]DezB, how about hooking up with a local Bikeability trainer for a quick session?[/i]

Please edit that you patronising pillock. That's the most insulting sh1t I've read on here. Your judgement that I need training is from one poorly worded (I admit) posting? I've been commuting for the past 15 years and not been knocked off once. You know nothing about the cycle lane I'm using, so how can you say I'm asking for trouble? Piss off.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:21 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Law is a tricky one, but *ought* to protect the cyclist on the grounds of

1. The vehicle behind can see clearly
2. The cyclist is necessarily less able to see behind, not being fitted with mirrors.

However, the cylists can't just signal and swing right - you still need to do all reasonable actions to check and not move into the path of another vehicle. We know that cyclists may be overtaken by cars, so it shouldn't come as a surprise that cars may try to overtake.

The real key is to try to develop your route to avoid too many right turns. I have six on the way to work - only one is in "open" traffic (and is a junction on a bend, for added fun).


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:28 pm
Posts: 597
Free Member
 

In QLD Oz(according to Robbie McEwewn' Twitter) today they have become the first state to make it the law to give xyxlists a min of 1m clearance when overtaking etc.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 12:34 pm
 gazc
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

this happened to me this morning, riding in a 'defensive' position (as i alway do with all my biking paraphernalia on) signalling right, checked for a gap which there was, went into gap so i was in the middle of the lane still signalling and some utter nob in a crappy corsa decided to plant the throttle and narrowly overtake me, swerving in before traffic coming the other direction and narrowly missing my front wheel. can't see how riding any different could have avoided it, but bloody annoying cos not only did he nearly have me off the bike he could have hit the person coming the other way! unfortunately didn't get his number plate 🙁

bring on a minimum overtaking distance although struggle to see how can be enforced really


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 1:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The law is'nt bothered.
Drivers do try this on - I had one try it on me las week. You can do stuff to prevent it - ever considered Cycle Training? - these days its as rigorous as Motorcycle Training, and if you're lucky it might be available free in your area (it is in Notts)


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

[i]In QLD Oz(according to Robbie McEwewn' Twitter) today they have become the first state to make it the law to give xyxlists a min of 1m clearance when overtaking etc. [/i]

There was that stupid petition that cropped up on here sometimes 2 or 3 times a day at one point asking for it to be made law that cars give 3ft of space when overtaking. What a load of crap that was - they can't enforce the current laws like having insurance and VED, keeping disqualified drivers off the roads etc, how on earth is someone going to enforce that one?! "Oh I'm sorry sir, you only gave that cyclist 2'8", it's a £60 fine and some points for you".
Never going to happen.

Fortunately the reply that came back from 10 DS gave it short shrift - the ruling is already there in the Highway Code that you should give "at least as much space as you would a car".

The problem lies with the fact that the vast majority of motorists and a substantial minority of cyclists are w@nkers. 😉


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 2:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

gazc - sit up and stare at the driver of the car behind until you are certain they have seen you , registered your presence and are going to leave room for you to pull out.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 2:49 pm
 s
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 2:52 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

Or shave your legs and wear a blonde wig - must dig out that "study" that said motorists give women cyclists more room...


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 2:55 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]gazc - sit up and stare at the driver of the car behind until you are certain they have seen you , registered your presence and are going to leave room for you to pull out.[/i]

WTF? Going 20mph heading for a right turn, [b]look behind you[/b] until you catch the eye of the driver. 😆

Or are you really suggesting slowing enough to make this possible? Why not just use the nearest pelican crossing?


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 7540
Full Member
 

The problem lies with the fact that the [s]vast majority of motorists and[/s] a substantial minority of [s]cyclists[/s] [i]people[/i] are w@nkers.

Fixed that for you, there are idiots using all forms of transport, difference is an idiot in a car is a lot more dangerous


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 3:22 pm
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

[i]WTF? Going 20mph heading for a right turn, look behind you until you catch the eye of the driver.[/i]

Why not? Perfectly valid skill for cycling on the road. Drivers are expected to check their blind spot at speeds of up to 70mph on a motorway.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 3:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup - at that point the main danger is the car behind you.

Its usually only a few seconds until they register you and you can be sure. If its more than a few seconds you split your attention between them and the front

Never pull out into a line of traffic until you are certain the driver behind knows you are there

Basic defensive riding. Don't give 'em the chance to kill you


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 3:33 pm
 gazc
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy

gazc - sit up and stare at the driver of the car behind until you are certain they have seen you , registered your presence and are going to leave room for you to pull out.

i'm quite sure he saw me alright, if he didn't, i'd probably be in the hospital/morgue right now instead of writing this. the point is he chose to ignore me NOT that he didn't see me, but thanks for the advice anyway. i'll make sure to ask my doctor about getting my eyes transplanted into the back of my head when i next see him 😉

ps: i do agree making eye contact does work with motorists, especially at roundabouts/junctions. just unfortunately when cars are speeding up from behind its not that easy...


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 4:04 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

I've had people overtake me despite being in the middle of a road lit up like a christmas tree with my arm stuck out to the right like a bloody barrier and they still overtake rather than just take teir foot off the load pedal. MORONS


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 4:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find it very irritating when cars refuse to stop on round abouts to give way.

Or keep coming right towards you and stop a few feet away, rather than waiting at the white line on their turn of the round about.

There are a lot of fools in our society, can't see that changing any time soon.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Eye contact with drivers is everything! Looking over your shoulder while signaling right, while there about to pull out in front of you on a roundabout etc.
I think one of the problems in cambridge is that all the motorists assume that all cyclists ride like students and are surprised when they see someone signaling and using the roads properly.


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

true story:

- look behind and see a car gradually approaching me

- signal right and gradually moved to right of lane, signalling all the time. car now behind me, going slow. lights 2 metres ahead amber

- stop at light which has just turned red as pedestrian crosses. Right turn 10metres ahead. Car now stopped, waiting behind me. I look round at driver - he's seen me. I continue signalling right for the duration of the red light

- green light. I set off still in right hand of the lane. With right turn 5-10 metres ahead, again signal right until I reach the turn. car still slowly behind me

- no traffic head so stop signalling, put hand on bars and immediately begin turning right

- car decides that now is the perfect time to overtake me on the right (he's going straight on)

- knocks me off on the wrong side of the road

- c0ck


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 6:11 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

This thread makes me wonder if some people actually leave their keyboards and ride round in some kind of fantasy world of their own invention.

Note to self: stick to MTB threads


 
Posted : 13/10/2010 6:45 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 592
Full Member
 

Eye contact with drivers is everything!
Nope sorry, eye contact with drivers [i]helps[/i] but I've made eye contact with a driver about to pull out, I see them, they see me then pull out anyway! There are no hard and fast rules I'm afraid.

DezB don't be too insulted by the course recommendations (altho it does sound patronising), I've been commuting a long time but a friend who does the courses pointed out that despite not gutter riding, I was still too close to the kerb. Tempted to do one myself, a refresher every now and then is probably a good thing for everyone. Like say a driving test every 5-10years would be a good idea too.
Waits for flaming.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 8:14 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Too late mate!
Funnily enough, I checked yesterday and the cycle lane actually finishes before I start checking to turn right! It's one of those useless across-the-junction cycle lanes. So I'm actually well positioned on the road side of the double yellows when this twonk hits my hand.
Still probably my fault for not being the super-skilled-ride-along-looking-backwards-highly-trained-roadie-**** that seems to frequent this place.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 8:22 am
Posts: 396
Free Member
 

think that irrespective some drivers have already got it in their heads that they are overtaking you and even if you get eye contact and are clearly signalling they just continue on their merry way (not a reckless intent just like the drivers that don't notice a truck about to change lanes on the motorway and drive into the trucks blind spot - its just not in their reasoning)

also think some drivers believe that when you look back at them you are acknowledging that you've seen them and so it is ok to pass you


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 10:44 am
Posts: 3284
Full Member
 

its pushy pushy rude individuals who are in too much of a hurry

they would be the same whatever they are doing, driving is just one outlet

no point in getting stressed about it


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

I would agree about making eye contact with drivers, its the best way to get an idea of what they're up to. You can pick out the considerate ones and the ones who are studiously trying to ignore your existence whilst they save that vital 2 seconds on their journey by cutting you up. If you're going so fast in traffic that you can't look over your shoulder you haven't got enough room around you, or you're in too much of a hurry.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 11:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dez - I ride in a city most days and have done for decades. I[u] always[/u] Sit up and stare at the driver behind until they acknowledge my presence or go past and will not pull out into the traffic flow until one has

By doing this you change from " a bike" to " a person" to them and they give way to you. The ones that don't want to give way to you you have seen and let go past.

I have never had the situation you describe happen to me. I would have either seen they are the type to do this and not pulled out or would have forced them to acknowledge my presence

So I'm actually well positioned on the road side of the double yellows when this twonk hits my hand.

Sounds much too close to the kerb to me.

Perhaps others have developed or found techniques that you have not thought of to reduce hazards and increase car drivers awareness of them.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The point of this thread is that despite being lit up like Sellafield on a bad day, obeying every rule of the road to the letter, looking into their eyes like Kaa hypnotising Mowgli, the ****s still think "nah, it's only a cyclist, I'll overtake anyway"


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 1:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had this at mini roundabouts a few times, pillocks trying to save 2 seconds by cutting in front of me


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 1:59 pm
Posts: 1642
Full Member
 

IMO a lot of drivers simply feel uncomfortable sitting behind a cyclist, figuring that if they're in front a rear-ending (ie bike into car) is going to hurt less than the other way around.

Spatial awareness is often the problem - many drivers are not sufficiently capable of appreciating the speed of a cyclist and what that means for any overtaking manoeuvre. I see this all the time.

Of course, there's a not-insignificant minority who are simply boorish, ignorant, aggressive, stupid, irrational asshat morons who feel in some way threatened by the presence of a cyclist ahead of them and cannot bear to yield in any way.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 2:08 pm
Posts: 20169
Full Member
 

[i]Spatial awareness is often the problem - many drivers are not sufficiently capable of appreciating the speed of a cyclist and what that means for any overtaking manoeuvre. I see this all the time.[/i]

True - most manoeuvres aren't malicious or deliberately dangerous on the part of the motorist, they simply have no clue as to how to handle a cyclist. 12mph seems to be accepted as a typical cyclist speed (if my average went anything near as low as 12mph, I'd be considering another form of transport!) so they simply don't consider that cyclists might actually be doing 25mph. I've had people overtake on downhill stretches or coming up to pinch points in the road; it's not malicious, their thought process is simply "cyclist, I MUST get past NOW!" and then they're surprised and sometimes offended when I overtake them straight back.

There's still a school of thought in this country that the motorist is hard done by, has spent tens of thousands on a car, more thousands on the test, the insurance, the MOT/VED, the fuel and therefore has some sort of right to roads as portrayed in car ads, the joy of the open road etc.
Until that entrenched mental attitude changes and a bit of education kicks in, nothing will change.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 2:40 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]Sounds much too close to the kerb to me.[/i]

I seriously cannot f&(*ing believe the CYCLISTS on here are still thinking this ONE-OFF event in 7 years of riding the same route, was MY BLOODY FAULT.

You have no idea how close to the kerb I am in relation to the width of the road! <Rest of post deleted.>


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That right turn one happens more than anything else IMO. White van man gave me an earfull this morning as he swerved round me. Even more angry because he was "forced" to drive over the centre of the road with approaching traffic because I was 2 Metres from the kerb. The other bad one is then they tend to underpass. Once a stream of them start to accelerate up the inside then it can get quite scary sat next to the white line. I try to find the spot where no-one can get past either side, but it doean't always work.

My wife does the school run on our tandem. I've just bought her TWO of those silly (but brilliant) lollipops. They are fitted now the very ends of the stoker handlebars, and my little girl pops them out [i]both sides[/i] in traffic, and folds them back on the paths. It makes them a metre wide and has helped a lot.


 
Posted : 14/10/2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Tell em you know sheldon that should sort it 🙂


 
Posted : 15/10/2010 10:12 pm
Posts: 7167
Full Member
 

Why do drivers in general refuse to slow to cyclist speeds, and give way to cyclists when turning right?

Fuel costs.I think alot of it is down to the price of fuel. I really do . Having to slow from C.42mph to 15mph , wait then accelerate up to the stationary queue wastes valuable fuel.

Time. People leave for work at the last possible minute as most people detest their jobs, and getting stuck behind a cyclist for 30 secs will ( in their minds ) make them late for work.

Driving peer pressure / bullying. Some drivers fear retribtion from the queue of vehicles behind them for holding up traffic whilst waiting for a cyclist . The bloody cyclist has no right to be in the way, he does not pay road tax ( 1935 i know) therefore a cyclist can be overtaken on right hand corners , approaching red lights etc. Otherwise the driver of the white Citrown Relay thats positioned 6" from the woman in front will get road rage, so best to dispense with the cyclist by overtaking on a blind corner rather than annoy white van man.

Distractions. Radio on or MP3 on LOUD , mobile phone chirping away etc. I see lots of people texting whilst driving, people driving on the phone at 0530 in the morning. Who are they phoning at 0530 FFS? All this flow of information stops the thought process as to how to deal with the idiot wobbling all over the road at walking speed in front of them, so all they do is steer round the idiot and if a bus comes round the corner then the cyclist goes in an ambulance.

Safety. Modern cars turn into bouncy castles in the event of an accident. Car safety is a major marketing feature nowadays with Ncap ratings being used. This makes drivers feel invulnrable therefore the bus coming round the corner wont hurt at all.

Brings us back to turning right . TJ makes full eye contact with the driver behind whilst riding along at 25mph in a town . Recipe for riding into the back of a queue of stationary traffic.
Dezb should have riding lessons . and not use the cycle lane . ever .
Maybe a big mirror on a stick is the answer , like a traffic wardens lolliplop?


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 7:32 am
 br
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]The highway code states that when overtaking a cyclist you give them the same room as you would a parked car. Does this happen? Pffft NEVER! [/i]

I certainly would not drive as close to a cyclist as I would to a parked car.
- Person opens door on parked car, loses door and maybe leg - their fault.
- Cyclist 'moves' right and I run him down - my fault.

The key to been given space is trying to get the other drivers to believe that they may come out worse, either financially or physically. This is something I learnt while m/c in and around London and the SE. And in this case a big FO bike use to help.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dez - I wasn't blaming you. I was attempting to make helpful suggestions for ways of avoiding this happening. Your description of where you were on the road sounded to close to the kerb to me. Maybe it wasn't.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 10:18 am
Posts: 70
Full Member
 

DezB, this experienced cyclist took Bikeability training:

http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.com/2010/07/my-cycle-training-session.html

I'm not saying you are a crap/indifferent/good rider or nuffink so relax, OK? Just read the article.

Drivers get away with this kind of behaviour because they can - they're big and made of metal, we're small and break easily. If cyclists routinely carried firearms they wouldn't do it.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 8:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

had a car hooting at me the other day because i was on the road and he could not go straight past.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 8:55 pm
Posts: 17683
Full Member
 

Good work there Sofaking.

Minimal effort from you but a fair old response.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:15 pm
Posts: 9491
Full Member
 

My worst case of road rage was a few years ago now. When trying to turn right on my morning commute, something I had been doing at the same spot for years. Looking behind me the traffic was moving slowly, my hand had been out for a few seconds anyway, so any car would have had plenty of warning that I needed to turn right.

The driver behind decided he was going to overtake, even though I was almost across forcing me onto the pavement at the opposite side of the road. He wound down his window and the abuse I got was shocking, this luckily was in front of 4 pedestrians, one of which was a young child. This driver couldn't go anywhere as the traffic lights had turned to red and he was now in a queue.
I ended up crying, with all of the witnesses saying they would give evidence if needed. We managed to find a nearby mtb police officer, who took my report very seriously. In the mean time the car driver (who had all his mates with him at the time) had driven off.

It still makes me nervous making a right hand turn because of this idiot.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

KOS wind it in

Sofaking, surprised a car could get along side you as you are do phat.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:34 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]Brings us back to turning right . TJ makes full eye contact with the driver behind whilst riding along at 25mph in a town . Recipe for riding into the back of a queue of stationary traffic.
Dezb should have riding lessons . and not use the cycle lane . ever .
[/i]

🙂
Almost opposite my right-turn is a left turn, if I was looking backwards at approaching cars, I would be unaware of anything appearing at and maybe coming out of that left turn. That would be rather f&(*ing stupid.
There is only one perfect way to avoid the knock on the hand: remove the driver that did it from the road.
SimonE. Forgive me if I don't follow your link, but I've had enough of this!
Yes, well done Safaking. Did you get an answer?


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:36 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Looks like your all back with some service now

X

🙂


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 10:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am not at risk of riding into the traffic in front. Its only a matter moments and you can keep diverting your attention between front and rear.

IMO it is absolutely essential to do this and I do it all the time. It does two things -you can see when the driver has acknowledged your presence and you can see the drivers that won't and the other one is it alters you from " a bike" to "A human" in the eyes of the driver.

Decades of urban riding I have never had this happen to me. Observation, making eye contact, riding assertively are the key factors.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 10:23 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]There's still a school of thought in this country that the motorist is hard done by, has spent tens of thousands on a car, more thousands on the test, the insurance, the MOT/VED, the fuel and therefore has some sort of right to roads as portrayed in car ads, the joy of the open road etc.
Until that entrenched mental attitude changes and a bit of education kicks in, nothing will change. [/i]

James for president!!!

Personally I'd kneecap all those drivers who think they can treat cyclists badly because they think they...

a) Won't be able to catch back up with them.
b) Are all jessies.

I have personally reverted quite a number of drivers opinions on the above two matters. It is however a large world with an apparently infinate number of bell ends in charge of motor vehicles.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 10:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They're jealous is what it is.

I easily keep up with traffic on my rush-hour commute. I overtake queues, leaving the cars to my left, I stop at red lights, I don't ride curbs (often anyway) and I still get where I'm going before they do.

My bike cost about £600, I didn't have to pay VED on it and, averaged across the year, it costs me about £1.50 a week in brakes, chains, batteries, bearings etc. Corse they're p*ssed off.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 11:40 pm
Posts: 70
Full Member
 

Forgive me if I don't follow your link, but I've had enough of this!

You are forgiven, my son 😉

That's a pity though, you might have learnt something. The author did, I did, and we've both been riding on the road for a while.

Until that entrenched mental attitude changes and a bit of education kicks in, nothing will change.

Agreed. Drivers are sold the dream of the open road, they get attitude training from Clarkson and their superior skills from watching F1 on the telly.

The [i]love[/i] of the car (not just its practical value) as well as the sense of invulnerability when confronted by a poxy cyclist, means that the 2,222 people who were killed on the road last year doesn't register for the headline writers - compare that with those who died in Afghanistan. And then there are the 24,690 who are seriously injured. That's a lot of injures, and we're not talking a graze or fall from which you get up and ride off.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 11:14 am
Posts: 7167
Full Member
 

I like the bit about not signalling left when turning left . It seems wrong , but when you think about it as inviting an oncoming car to join you at the apex of the turn it makes sense.
The car behind will heave a sigh if relief that their journey is no longer being held up and they dont have to engage brain to overtake the poxy bike infront, and the oncoming car will have his journey delayed by 20 secs / till the next gap appears.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 11:34 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

dez; genuine question.

you seem so defensive; do you genuinely believe that you would learn nothing from training?

i would love to do some but it is not free in my area...


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 12:15 pm
Page 1 / 2

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!