You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Okay I'm not sure what's more worrying. The fact that this man thinks it's okay to drive through a busy street at 35mph whilst he has a bowl of cereal:
Or the fact that several comments on the road.cc facebook feed chastise THE CYCLIST and say he should just [i]"live and let live"[/i] 😯
road.cc FB post:
Full story:
http://road.cc/content/news/98225-video-helmet-cam-cyclist-busts-driver-eating-cereal-30mph
Cereal in Edinburgh
FFS
What's wrong with fried white pudding
Wow, and I was surprised this morning when the gentleman in front of me driving a Porsche SUV extended his arm out of the window and emptied the steaming remains of a hot drink out of his mug onto the central reservation.
Drinking a hot drink! Out of a MUG! While piloting about 3 tonnes of metal!
Thankfully, the 'rush hour' is a very rare phenomenon for me. I couldn't take it on a daily basis.
No harm done, the "what if" taliban may think different though...
I can't wait for Google Glass.
No harm done, the "what if" taliban may think different though...
😯
So same as if I was drunkenly letting off a shotgun near a school, or swinging a big sword in the street?
No one hurt (this time) so "no harm done"?
No harm done
Apart from not being fully in control of 1200kg of vehicle and overtaking in a no overtaking area. 🙄
Ah, but he didn't [i]actually[/i] kill anyone Sandwich - so apparently that makes it all fine. 😯
🙄So same as if I was drunkenly letting off a shotgun near a school, or swinging a big sword in the street?No one hurt (this time) so "no harm done"?
🙄
🙄
[quote=seavers said]I can't wait for Google Glass.
It will be interesting to see how it's introduction will affect our day to day life + laws that's for sure 🙂
Pouring coffee from a flask whilst driving a van is an art form !! It helps if the tracking is good as you steer with your knees
I love it when folk defend , what appear to me as outlandish ill thought out musings with an eye roll
is there a better way of arguing your point...I think not
I've said on here before I think, but on my Glasgow -> Edinburgh commute I've witnessed loads of crazy things. One woman giving herself a haircut at 80mph in the middle lane (scissors one hand, brush in the other using the rear view mirror to see what she was doing) whilst steering with her knee. A driver watching hardcore porn, another watching cartoon porn. And there was the driver using TWO mobile phones at once.
There was also a guy filling in some form of sales ledger that came close to killing me when I was on the CBR... only a lay by on the m8 Lanark slip saved me. He then called me names and threatened to "finish the job" when I shouted that he could have killed me. That didn't end well for him.
Edinburgh was always far worse for this sort of thing than Glasgow (IME). No idea why.
Regularly saw drivers reading behind the wheel too.
I love it when folk defend , what appear to me as outlandish ill thought out musings with an eye roll
is there a better way of arguing your point...I think not
🙄
There are thousands of stupid acts committed on the roads everyday, the majority of which have no consequence, this is one of them...as I said, no harm done.
Lazybike either a terrible troll or a **** - not sure
lazybike...
There are thousands of stupid acts committed on the roads everyday, the majority of which have no consequence, this is one of them...as I said, no harm done.
So, in general, eating cereal at the wheel is OK and *shoudn't* be an offence?
In some ways I agree with you - a "no harm done" blanket law might not be a bad idea, as long as the corollary of that is that if harm *is* done you go to jail for murder.
Piloting 1 1/2 tonnes of metal around a shared space should demand some form of attention. And showing a little respect for the safety of others using the road is more important (IMO) than necking some cereal. Is his hunger more important than other peoples safety?
There are thousands of stupid acts committed on the roads everyday, the majority of which have no consequence, this is one of them...as I said, no harm done.
Good point! Makes you wonder why we bother with any road rules at all eh?
We'd be better off just letting everyone do what they want and let Darwinism sort it out.
I hope neither, just a view that you're entitled to disagree with.Lazybike either a terrible troll or a **** - not sure
I'm sure there's some middle ground we could try first..Good point! Makes you wonder why we bother with any road rules at all eh?We'd be better off just letting everyone do what they want and let Darwinism sort it out.
I'd be fine:
Pfffft, seen a woman on the M4 doing probably 60mph with a white cereal bowl in one hand balanced in the middle of the steering wheel and a spoon in the other. Also another woman doing her eye make up in the car behind me using the mirror in the visor. I was doing 70, she was gaining on me.......
you mean like rules as to the minimum standard you must meet enshrined in law that we should all follow that sort of thing?
Lazybike either a terrible troll or a * - not sure
lazybike - Member
I hope neither, just a view that you're entitled to disagree with.
Well, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and call the latter, you *
C'mon - where are the low quality puns?
"Bet the police will give him a Frostie reception"
"He'll be looking at a spell of porridge!"
Stop milking it.
Classic serial offender behaviour.
The thing is, there [b]IS[/b] harm done.
He might not have actually hit anyone this time, but driving like that contributes to the feeling that the roads are unsafe, which means parents don't let their kids out as much and don't let them cycle to school. That does them harm!
Which is why the "big sword" analogy isn't as hysterical as it sounds:
If I swung a big sword about in the street but didn't hit anyone then I'd still be arrested, because I was making people feel that it was unsafe to walk down the street.
We have that now.. 😕 it doesn't stop the acts of stupidity or the what if merchants making out things are worse than they are.you mean like rules as to the minimum standard you must meet enshrined in law that we should all follow that sort of thing?
The thing is, there IS harm done.He might not have actually hit anyone this time, but driving like that contributes to the feeling that the roads are unsafe, which means parents don't let their kids out as much and don't let them cycle to school. That does them harm!
Which is why the "big sword" analogy isn't as hysterical as it sounds:
If I swung a big sword about in the street but didn't hit anyone then I'd still be arrested, because I was making people feel that it was unsafe to walk down the street.thats a good point, well made, I hadn't thought of it like that.
He might not have actually hit anyone this time, but driving like that contributes to the feeling that the roads are unsafe, which means parents don't let their kids out as much and don't let them cycle to school.
kids dont give a flying **** about going out anyway they would rather be wedged to their ipads safely tucked up at home watching you tube videos of cyclists nearly getting run over ,so essentially theres no harm done there
lazybike - Member
[s]thats a good point, well made, [/s]I hadn't thought[s] of it like that.[/s]
🙄
Managing 35mph in Edinburgh? Must have been driving an emergency vehicle!
Gridlock rant....
Junkyard - lazarusI love it when folk defend , what appear to me as outlandish ill thought out musings with an eye roll
is there a better way of arguing your point...
Personally I think reductio ad absurdum is a much better method. 😀
lazybike - member
🙄
😆
Some really ridiculous posts in here, I dunno where you people live.
There's no way a Corsa weighs 1.5 tons.
Personally I think reductio ad absurdum is a much better method.
It always feels like it's gone up a notch when the Latin comes out.
Some really ridiculous posts in here, I dunno where you people live.
There's no way a Corsa weighs 1.5 tons.
That's gross weight.
I know, don't seem to list kerb weight and max laden weight which I assume is 'gross'. I guess about 1100-1300ish + driver etc. What's 2-300kg when comparing to a pedestrian or cyclist?
Kerb weight was less than 1.1 ton, so still 10-15 times more than a bike even if driven by a stick insect with no luggage. Does seem bloody heavy for a small car, remember my Seicento being 700kg.
i think there is a case in court at the mo.after a lad was allegedly called some rude names by some other lads came back with his car ran them down using car as a weapon. I wonder how that will go in comparison with using a car as a weapon against a cyclist? might it set a positive precedent.
i think there is a case in court at the mo.after a lad was allegedly called some rude names by some other lads came back with his car ran them down using car as a weapon. I wonder how that will go in comparison with using a car as a weapon against a cyclist? might it set a positive precedent.
[url= http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2013/10/23/drink-driver-reversed-car-over-mans-head-in-tipton/ ]Here's a lovely example of similar[/url].
i think there is a case in court at the mo.after a lad was allegedly called some rude names by some other lads came back with his car ran them down using car as a weapon. I wonder how that will go in comparison with using a car as a weapon against a cyclist? might it set a positive precedent.
Didn't he get 20 years?
WTF
She drove her car whilst pissed driving over someone TWICE deliberatedly - one fo them returning to do so
She then lied about it being stolen
Sentence guess anyone!
Ratcliffe, aged 24, of Beverston Road, Tipton, pleaded guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm, dangerous driving, driving with excess alcohol and attempting to pervert the course of justice. Ms Paula Bagnall, defending, told the court that Ratcliffe, who is a mother of two, was deeply remorseful and very grateful that the victim was not seriously injured.
10 months sentence
How is that 10 months 😯
Hadnt seen any of the above cases but point still is no bikes involved in the tipton case so her 10 months could have been avoided if lad was on a bike at the time there are some proper scumbags out there. we are all doomed 🙁
Surely the victim can appeal against that sentance, how do judges come to these decisions.How is that 10 months
[url= https://twitter.com/EdinburghPolice/status/404887890976845824 ]Edinburgh police twitter[/url]
"We have traced and charged a male following enquiries into a YouTube video of a male driving whilst eating cereal. #carelessdriving"
Result.
This is our friend Raging Bike again. Didn't agree with him last week on getting into a pointless barney with the coppers and posting it to youtube, or menacing some foolish scooterist, but good on him for this result.
Result indeed - potential cereal killer that....
