 You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
[url=. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/mountain-biker-seriously-injured-fall-3715755 ]null[/url] http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/mountain-biker-seriously-injured-fall-3715755
Introducing adults and children to mountain biking is CRIMINAL. Mountain biking, besides being expensive and very environmentally destructive, is extremely dangerous. Recently a 12-year-old girl DIED during her very first mountain biking lesson! Serious accidents and even deaths are commonplace. Truth be told, mountain bikers want to introduce kids to mountain biking because (1) they want more people to help them lobby to open our precious natural areas to mountain biking and (2) children are too naive to understand and object to this activity. For 400+ examples of serious accidents and deaths caused by mountain biking, see http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtb_dangerous.htm.
Bicycles should not be allowed in any natural area. They are inanimate objects and have no rights. There is also no right to mountain bike. That was settled in federal court in 1996: http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtb10.htm . It's dishonest of mountain bikers to say that they don't have access to trails closed to bikes. They have EXACTLY the same access as everyone else -- ON FOOT! Why isn't that good enough for mountain bikers? They are all capable of walking....
A favorite myth of mountain bikers is that mountain biking is no more harmful to wildlife, people, and the environment than hiking, and that science supports that view. Of course, it's not true. To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts (see http://mjvande.nfshost.com/scb7.htm ). I found that of the seven studies they cited, (1) all were written by mountain bikers, and (2) in every case, the authors misinterpreted their own data, in order to come to the conclusion that they favored. They also studiously avoided mentioning another scientific study (Wisdom et al) which did not favor mountain biking, and came to the opposite conclusions.
Those were all experimental studies. Two other studies (by White et al and by Jeff Marion) used a survey design, which is inherently incapable of answering that question (comparing hiking with mountain biking). I only mention them because mountain bikers often cite them, but scientifically, they are worthless.
Mountain biking accelerates erosion, creates V-shaped ruts, kills small animals and plants on and next to the trail, drives wildlife and other trail users out of the area, and, worst of all, teaches kids that the rough treatment of nature is okay (it's NOT!). What's good about THAT?
For more information: http://mjvande.nfshost.com/mtbfaq.htm .
Nothing new to be concerned about. The commenter is a well-know cyclist-hater and proven unstable moron with criminal convictions for attacking cyclists.
Nature should only be stroked gently.
He makes some very good arguments on his links too, although the first one is broken, as is the man.
I assume that's the same American nutter who crops up every now and then?
Google "Mike Vandeman" and all will be revealed. On second thoughts, don't 🙂
i must have led a sheltered life. I had never heard of him.
what a nutjob!
A fringe, american, lunatic who attacked someone with a saw once - not natural but hey he took it with him.
No point even trying - he posts the exact same rant on any thread
he did this about Gisburn once claiming they were not allowed to cycle there
Why is he citing an American court case to claim that mountain bikers in Scotland don't have access rights to trails? Nutter !!
Anyway, I hope the mountain biker makes a full recovery.
He got his party hat to out rejoice when one of the forum members from BR died of an undiagnosed heart condition whilst asleep in a van at a DH event.
Vile, lowest of the low, ****
Google "M V*****" and all will be revealed.
Ssssshhhhh... if you say (or Google) his name three times then he appears!
sorry. true that. must be related to br@nt 🙂
Was in the daily retard, hence it's drivel.
Comments sections are there on online articles precisely so the swivel eyed loons can get a good froth on and hurl a bit of anonymous abuse about...
[url= http://www.outsideonline.com/blog/outdoor-adventure/the-trial-of-mike-vandeman-1.html ]mike-vandeman[/url]
[url= http://mjvande.nfshost.com/ ]He'll bore you to tears if you really want...[/url]