Anyone know the tyr...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Anyone know the tyre clearance of a 95 kona cindercone ?

11 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
404 Views
Posts: 513
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Cheers all


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 1:08 pm
 igm
Posts: 11833
Full Member
 

Not sure but I have 2.35 Big Apples in a 93 Hahana if that helps in any way.


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 1:11 pm
Posts: 9763
Full Member
 

Not sure but I have 2.35 Big Apples in a 93 Hahana if that helps in any way.

I was going to say not great by modern standards and thought maybe this contradicted my memory. But a slick tyre needs less space and no mud room.

I'd say 2.1 tops if its muddy

2.3 if nothing sticking

But with all the vagaries of what we mean by tyre size who knows. 2.1 Velociraptors were fine in my 94 Kona


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 1:28 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I was looking at some knobblies from px that were 2.1 or 2.3 I guess as I thought I'd need 2.1 ta


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 1:44 pm
Posts: 11292
Full Member
 

From memory I recall mates riding them with 2.2" tyres in them through the mud...it wasn't massive amounts of room but there was enough to keep riding...I suspect 2.3" would be pushing it though. 'Back then' the thinking was a thinner tyre on the back to cut through the crud and get grip so a lot of people were riding around on 1.9" tyres.


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 1:57 pm
Posts: 9180
Full Member
 

2.2 Specialized Enduro tyres and 2.2 Trail Kings/Rubber Queens are too big. 2.25 IRC Back Country's fit as do DMR Moto's.


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 4:52 pm
 kcal
Posts: 5448
Full Member
 

2.1.2.2 depending on knobblies, manufacturer etc.
Also may depend on true-ness of wheel and how tight you have the QR set up - can find flex and movement under pedalling, and I've found the chain stays get a bit worn.

2.1s on a similar age Kilauea here and I'm happy with that.


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 4:57 pm
Posts: 195
Free Member
 

Back then mates of mine were on 1.5" Continental Cross Countrys!


 
Posted : 25/10/2015 5:11 pm
Posts: 11292
Full Member
 

I recall 1 mate who ran a dart sc on the back - no idea why and he just said why not? That was 2.2...like I said, it was tight but rideable...we never questioned the width with him, it was always the tyre choice!


 
Posted : 26/10/2015 7:46 am
Posts: 33980
Full Member
 

My 97 lava Dome will take up to a 2.3 with room for mud


 
Posted : 26/10/2015 8:08 am
Posts: 4846
Full Member
 

My 1995 Cindercone took a largish 2.1 without too much issue,

[URL= http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd279/letmetalktomark/P1010043.jp g" target="_blank">http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd279/letmetalktomark/P1010043.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]

My later Caldera's have a differt chainstay and will take a 2.1 but 1.95 fits betterer 😉


 
Posted : 26/10/2015 9:43 am
Posts: 7884
Free Member
 

I found bigger tyres were a ball ache to get past the brake pads when taking the wheel out


 
Posted : 26/10/2015 10:16 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!