Anyone got any Plan...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Anyone got any Planet x super roubaix bibs?

28 Posts
19 Users
0 Reactions
147 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/CLPXBIBT/planet_x_super_roubaix_bib_tights

rate or hate for cold weather?


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 5:51 pm
Posts: 20675
 

Interested in the results of this thread!


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 5:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Also, what are they like for fit? Height wise I fall exactly between sizes! Don't know whether to upsize or downsize?


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 6:31 pm
 cp
Posts: 8928
Full Member
 

No pad just incase anyone missed it...


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 6:33 pm
 bol
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They come up a bit small and the zip is likely to last about one ride if they're anything like the ones I bought this time last year.


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 980
Free Member
 

nightmare to have a pi55 from?


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nope. Mine were grand today at the side of an empty car park.

Got a pair last year in the water-damage sale, only pair of bibs I have but I find them fairly comfy & warm enough today with a pair of padded shorts underneath.


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Padded short underneath!? FFS!

Edit - Didnt see this

These Bib Tights come with no padded insert for ultimate cold weather versatility.

Probably crap then.


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 8:13 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Why would you *not* want to wear your shorts under a winter bib tight?

Cold knackers!


 
Posted : 26/10/2012 9:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not got a pair of these but I agree with Brant, you need another lot of fabric in winter to make it bearable. Lots of bibs come without a pad.


 
Posted : 27/10/2012 8:49 am
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Even two layers of lycra can't stop it going back inside sometimes.

🙁


 
Posted : 27/10/2012 9:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just ordered the large (6ft 1) and 33" waist)


 
Posted : 31/10/2012 9:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

the large do not fit - back they go and XL here i come!!


 
Posted : 03/11/2012 6:44 am
Posts: 2829
Free Member
 

No pad = forget it 🙁


 
Posted : 03/11/2012 7:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

but no pad means you can wear them consecutive days with just a change of undershorts


 
Posted : 03/11/2012 7:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just a heads up i suppose, at 11.5 stone and 6ft 2" with a 32/33" waist i needed an XL in these for leg length!! So if in doubt go one size up.

Also if you buy on the web do not expect to take them back to the showroom for swapping/returns with any ease. Apparently px have 3 depts which only loosely work together - net returns have to be posted back.


 
Posted : 03/11/2012 8:59 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

Also if you buy on the web do not expect to take them back to the showroom for swapping/returns with any ease. Apparently px have 3 depts which only loosely work together - net returns have to be posted back.

Oh dear. I'm sorry that's what happened. I'll be looking into this tomorrow for you.


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 11:53 am
Posts: 25815
Full Member
 

XL and L have same inside leg according to PX website ? - misprint ?


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 12:10 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Why would you *not* want to wear your shorts under a winter bib tight?

Cold knackers!

Cos you wear baggies over them instead?

but no pad means you can wear them consecutive days with just a change of undershorts

My main issue is filthy muddy trails, not sweaty man vegetables, so wearing baggies over them means I can swap out manky baggies without the tights getting grotty.

Normal baggies don't mind getting washed frequently, but lycra does.


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 12:25 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

I'd much rather survive with an extra inch of leg on display, or use longer socks, than go up a size if it meant that the waist size went up as well. A pair of baggy tights can really spoil a ride in my experience.


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 12:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

they aren't baggy as they are lycra!! if they have stirrups how would you suggest the extra leg showing may occur?


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 2:34 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

assumed they were zipped, not stirrups.

As you were. 😳


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not wishing to hijack the thread but looking at these and other Bibs , My question is wouldn't 3/4 length be comfier and more likely to fit Im a 34/ 36" waist but have short legsand dont want to order ones that will be miles to long.
I've been struggling with wearing normal Bibs the last few weeks but its getting Baltic now , how much heat are you likely to feel with 3/4's. ?


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 3:49 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Def not as warm IMO.


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 4:15 pm
Posts: 24332
Full Member
 

3/4 mean cold feet for me


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Al and Rocketdog , point taken . My feet are always cold so probably best to order full length bib tights.


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 7:20 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

3/4 mean cold feet for me

Thermal socks FTW!


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 8:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i quite often come home with a witchity grubb lol


 
Posted : 04/11/2012 9:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

brant - Member
Also if you buy on the web do not expect to take them back to the showroom for swapping/returns with any ease. Apparently px have 3 depts which only loosely work together - net returns have to be posted back.
Oh dear. I'm sorry that's what happened. I'll be looking into this tomorrow for you.

POSTED 1 DAY AGO # REPORT-POST

Any feedback?


 
Posted : 06/11/2012 10:14 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!