Anyone Gone Back to...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Anyone Gone Back to an Alu Frame from Carbon?

23 Posts
19 Users
0 Reactions
321 Views
Posts: 726
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Do you regret it?

I can't get a demo on the bike I'm interested in so just wondering if anyone has returned to aluminium and how they found the change ?


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 9:34 am
Posts: 2434
Free Member
 

Nope certainly don’t regret it. More than happy on Alu. Had a carbon fuel ex and went back to Alu. Don’t really notice the difference to be honest. It might be a tad heavier, but that’s not massively noticeable.
I also have a winter road bike that is Alu and again don’t notice to much difference. But then again it takes wide tyres (32mm) so I find it very comfortable. It’s slower than the good bike but that’s mainly down to the fact that my summer bike is an aero bike with nice kit. But it’s very capable, used for road and gravel.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 9:48 am
Posts: 11292
Full Member
 

I went back and glad I did...not as flexy and just as light. I also seem to have developed a concern for landfill so now have a real dislike for carbon bike parts (although they do look nice!).

Didn't regret it.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 9:51 am
Posts: 324
Free Member
 

went from a santa cruz stigmata cc to a kinesis tripster al.... zero regrets... just as fast, i'm less stressed about damaging it, just as much fun, end build is only 500g heavier


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 10:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

 
Posted : 16/05/2020 10:50 am
Posts: 563
Free Member
 

Yes. Would not buy a carbon frame again. Felt too light, too stiff, too harsh and the constant fear of crashing it on rocks and damaged by it. Way way happier on alloy.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:11 am
Posts: 726
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks folks. A lot of you are echoing my thoughts.

I've had two carbon frames now and I definitely stress a lot more about rock damage.

Thinking of moving from an Intense Primer to a Hightower Al.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Every week ...I swap between them.

On balance I'd probably not go carbon again - too much worry.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:24 am
Posts: 40225
Free Member
 

Yes, alu all the way for me for full-sus MTBs.

Partly economics but also there's not so wide a choice of geometries and suspension layouts if you limit yourself to carbon.

I think my Orange FS frames are comparable weight-wise to boggo carbon anyway, looking at (and weighing) full builds.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:26 am
Posts: 726
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I'm glad to read I am maybe not as neurotic as I thought I was about frame damage.

Been MTBing for 25 years and through all the alu frames I had I can't remember consciously fretting about frame damage out on a ride. Every time I hear a ping from a stone now I'm getting off and checking as well as the regular checks for cracks when washing the bike.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:40 am
 Kuco
Posts: 7181
Free Member
 

I've switched between aluminium and carbon for both road an mtb. Can't say I've ever noticed much difference. The only reason I currently got carbon mtb at the moment was I got it through C2W on a sale bike and it was a good deal. But still got a aluminium hardtail.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:41 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

I’ve had both at the same time. I dont even think about it now. Given the choice between two identical frames, I’d still go for the carbon one.

Hell, one of mine is even a Yeti & I don’t think about it 😆

Interested in something else at the moment, which is also only in carbon. If it was the right bike only in Alu, I wouldn’t discount it though.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:43 am
Posts: 6203
Full Member
 

Why all the stress about damaging carbon frames? I thought it was supposed to be easier to repair than Aluminium.

I've ridden (and still ride) steel, carbon and aluminium frames. They all seem to work and I don't really worry about damaging one any more than the other. But them I'm a mincer so frame damage is pretty low risk for me anyway I guess 🙂


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 11:47 am
 JAG
Posts: 2401
Full Member
 

I’ve never owned a carbon-fibre frame and probably won’t bother now. More recently I have also thought this...

have developed a concern for landfill so now have a real dislike for carbon bike parts


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 12:13 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Concern for landfill...maybe consume less?


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 12:56 pm
Posts: 20675
 

Why all the stress about damaging carbon frames? I thought it was supposed to be easier to repair than Aluminium.

It is, but lets not let rational thought get in the way of fear. As for landfill, I'd be amazed if anyone considering a carbon bike vs a metal one would recycle the metal one, as opposed to sell it/pass it on to kids etc. Which they would do for a carbon one too...

The Pole marketing vid really had a big effect didnt it? All because carbon was expensive. Rather ironic now they are having to recycle a fair few of their (broken) alu bikes...

As for me, a good bike is a good bike, frame material is only a piece of the puzzle. Just happens that a lot of very good bikes are carbon, so that's what I get.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 1:05 pm
Posts: 3002
Full Member
 

@shooterman give me a nudge if you want my thoughts on the alloy hightower frame (I considered the CC too).


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 1:21 pm
Posts: 726
Full Member
Topic starter
 

@snotrag. Message sent.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 1:35 pm
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

Yep, went from a Specialized Tarmac to an Emonda ALR. Much prefer it, mainly because of the clearance for 28mm tyres and disc brakes. Oh, and the colour 😁


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 2:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why all the stress about damaging carbon frames? I thought it was supposed to be easier to repair than Aluminium.

Easier is subjective.
They certainly can be often be repaired and I have had one repaired but:

a) It's expensive
b) It takes time
c) They can't always be repaired

They are also subject to what I think of as more "random damage" than a steel or alloy frame as in directional or sharp objects.

If I'm honest I got my repair done because of the "value" of the frame but I could have got a brand new alu frame for not much difference. It took a few weeks with booking in and such and then a few day's to find out if it was repairable..


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 2:41 pm
Posts: 11292
Full Member
 

Concern for landfill…maybe consume less?

Unsure I can, I have 1 bike and I keep them for a few years, so my consumption is already low as it is 1 in and 1 out.

Haven't seen the Pole video either...a brand I've absolutely no interest in - what did the video show?


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

back and forth loads. went from only alloys to a carbon cube stereo which was replaced with an alloy transition, swapped that for an alloy kona process, then a carbon YT, then a alloy orange, then carbon kona, then alloy stumpy - next up is a carbon np reactor.

no issues riding a carbon frame, but cba with carbon anything else, in particular bars and wheels.


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 5:58 pm
Posts: 11522
Full Member
 

Moved from a carbon Cannondale to an aluminium Rose (road bikes).

Biggest difference I notice is less time chasin creaks! Don't know if that's a Cannondale or carbon thing though...


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 6:32 pm
Posts: 3136
Full Member
 

Decent aluminum rocks 👌🏻


 
Posted : 16/05/2020 6:39 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!