Anybody got a Bird ...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Anybody got a Bird Zero AM ?

21 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
341 Views
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi all , has anybody got a mk3 one of these ? I’ve never been too confident on bumps and jumps when riding my full sussers over the years ( as my username also suggests) . I was a lot more confident on a hardtail so I’ve been looking at the Bird Zero AM frame to build up . How do you find it and would you recommend one ? Thanks. Mark

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 8:58 pm
Posts: 134
Free Member
 

Looks to be a good bike but potentially a bit on the long side if jumping / learning jumping is the priority.

Look how short dirt jump bikes are. Of course shorter also means less stable on trails so there's generally somewhat of a compromise.

Disclaimer: haven't ridden it

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 9:06 pm
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It’s not so much learning to jump but more like I was fine on a hardtail on drops and jumps and nowhere near as confident on a full suspension bike . Just usual trail centre stuff and reds were usually my limit on a full susser

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 9:15 pm
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

I’ve got a Mk2 - well, the original Zero AM before the slightly longer and slacker boost version. It’s great! You can size up or down with a long dropper post to get the reach you want. Personally I’d err on the shorter side, I’m 5’10.5” on a medium (static reach 436, sagged ~455).

Clearly it’s not a dirt jumper but I don’t think that’s what you’re asking about! They’re short for tricks and steep jump faces.

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 9:20 pm
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

What’s your full-sus?

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 9:22 pm
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

On one codeine 650b and an older 26 el guapo

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 9:26 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

So how does this subliminal messaging work? I have no space for a HT, I'm sure I don't need one, or really want one and now I'm doing a spec deliberation on the bird website!! Must be C2W time again.....

 
Posted : 24/03/2019 10:36 pm
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Mikewsmith, genuine question and nothing subliminal . I fancy a zero am ht so I’m probably going to flog one of the other bikes to make way for it and I’m just after some real feedback from anyone who may have ridden one

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 6:02 am
Posts: 17187
Full Member
 

Not quite an AM but I do have a Zero TR, which I bought just over a year ago. Very capable and confidence inspiring. My FS is a 2017 Anthem. I ride them on similar stuff, with Anthem generally used in drier conditions and bigger days in the hills. Natural xc stuff for me and some trail centre red grade stuff when weather is poor.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 6:31 am
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Iainc, how does the AM differ roughly from the TR geometry wise ?

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 6:38 am
Posts: 902
Free Member
 

I completely love my mk 2 am. I'm 6'1 and my frame is large.  Fits me perfectly and rides really nicely,  although I am by no means the most talented rider!

What is wrong with the codeine? I was very close to buying one of those frames, but a tightish budget meant no spare cash for a rear shock.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:02 am
Posts: 10225
Full Member
 

Am - TR

I think the AM is longer and slacker. The TR is more traditional trail bike (still with modern geometry) whilst the AM is more of a hardcore hardtail. The AM is designed for a longer fork and more extreme steep terrain.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:08 am
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Malv173 there’s nothing wrong with the codeine , I just seem to remember being far more confident on a HT and am thinking if I’m going to get a HT it might as well be a Zero AM . No other reason than that really

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:28 am
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

What is wrong with the codeine?

I'd be willing to bet the OPs shock set up is a mess, and that's what affects his jumping so much.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:28 am
Posts: 28680
Full Member
 

I’d be willing to bet the OPs shock set up is a mess, and that’s what affects his jumping so much.

He needs a Shockwiz 😉

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:30 am
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You could be right there

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 7:50 am
Posts: 2081
Free Member
 

I think the AM is longer and slacker

Slacker yes, but believe the TR actually has the longer reach.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 9:06 am
Posts: 10225
Full Member
 

If you compare large with large the am boost 2019 has a longer reach and slacker head angle than the TR according to the frame charts. ETT is the same.

If you compare ML in the boost with the M in the tr (same size seat tubes) then the AM is also a longer reach.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 9:18 am
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

“Slacker yes, but believe the TR actually has the longer reach.”

That was the case with the original AM but not the current boost version.

I would twiddle (in an organised fashion) with your suspension. I’m far from great at jumping and I find getting the rebound balanced front to rear matters a lot to me getting airborne confidently.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 9:28 am
Posts: 108
Full Member
 

I have a medium non-boost version that I built up myself. Great bike. I'm small (5ft 7) so I put a 30mm stem on to help with reach. For a "long" bike it corners and changes direction really well and is very stable jumping. On smooth / flowing reds and jumps it's awesome. I'd highly recommend one.

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 9:46 am
Posts: 139
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ok thanks all for the info

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 10:55 am
Posts: 17187
Full Member
 

crapjumper

Member
Iainc, how does the AM differ roughly from the TR geometry wise ?

I think others have answered and the relative geo has changed a bit in the last year. The TR is a bit more xc orientated than the AM, designed round a 130 fork while the AM is more like 140 I believe

 
Posted : 25/03/2019 11:23 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!