Any reason NOT to h...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Any reason NOT to have short chainstays on a bike?

24 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
202 Views
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[u]Short chainstays = fun.[/u]

Disregarding front mech, tyre and chainring clearance issues, why would you NOT spec as short chainstays as possible on a bike, if you had the choice?

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 1:57 pm
Posts: 166
Free Member
 

front end lift while climbing and clearance issues

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 1:58 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

so we should all have vertical seat tubes to minimise chain stay length?

my 2p - a 'balanced' geometry = fun.

If you focus on only one element you'll end up compromise somewhere else.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 1:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the front wheel lifts too easily on climbs.

i'm too slow.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:00 pm
Posts: 4213
Free Member
 

Stability at speed. DH bikes are longer for this reason.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:03 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

As above.

I find long chainstays fun tho, 1985 Stumpjumper was one of the most fun and best handling bike's I've ridden.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:04 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Interesting. Cheers.
I ask because after going up a tyre size on my Voodoo, I had to slide the wheel back for clearance. Seemed to make a noticeable difference in getting the front wheel up.

Just wondering about many reasons for varying geometry, should I ever pull my finger out and design a frame or 2

So how do you get stability AND ease of chucking-about?

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:07 pm
Posts: 8318
Full Member
 

I think my 86 Rockhopper had 18" stays, it always felt very stable and comfortable. Front ends of course were a bit lighter back then even though the bars were probably the heaviest ever made.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 4267
Full Member
 

Disregarding front mech, tyre and chainring clearance issues

😀

So how do you get stability AND ease of chucking-about?

Stability = long wheel base
Chuckability = minimal moment of inertia

So you can do it, it just has to be made of unobtainium.

:o)

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 13942
Full Member
 

So how do you get stability AND ease of chucking-about?

You practise! 😉

Stability and manoeuvrability are opposites. Fighter planes achieve both by having natural instability so great manoeuvrability with a computer system constantly keeping the aircraft stable.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So I need a button on the handlebars to lengthen the chainstays when required.

Replace the chainstays with a couple of remote dropper seatposts?

😀

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 2:30 pm
Posts: 8318
Full Member
 

Replace the chainstays with a couple of remote dropper seatposts?

Yes but you link them to your dropper post in it's usual place and as it drops down it pushes out the chainstays and as you raise it the chainstays shrink.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 3:08 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

isn't that kind of what the Kona Magic link thing does (in part)?

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 3:10 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

ah, but what happens if you want to manual, whilst going down a steep descent? you need sdaale down AND chainstays shortened.

Surley what we're talking about here is the next gen Bionicon?

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 3:10 pm
Posts: 6009
Free Member
Topic starter
 

isn't that kind of what the Kona Magic link thing does

[url= http://www.konabikeworld.com/08_tech_magic.htm ]Something like that[/url] I think.

<goes off to find a Kona demo day...>

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 966
Free Member
 

that reminds me of the original Mantiou full-suss frame which had a pair of Manitou shocks as seatstays...

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think some people are confusing short chainstays with a short wheelbase or assuming that the two go hand in hand which is not necessarily the case.

Short chainstays on their own.....means nothing. it's how they fit the bikes geometry as a whole and what your preference is as a rider.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 4:23 pm
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

Short chainstays for manuals - what more do you want?!

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 4:25 pm
Posts: 3300
Full Member
 

Back in the day I recall an Ozone Oxygen had 15.5" stays on bog standard front end geometry. incredibly skitty over anything rough but climbed well once you found a way of keeping the front end down!

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 5:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a sovereign and don't have the chainstays on the shortest setting. I prefer them about 16.3-16.5. Any smaller and it becomes a bit unbalanced as an all rounder.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 6:59 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

My custom frame has 14.6"(370mm) chainstays on 26" wheels.

It also has a 75 degree headangle and 480mm width handlebars. A bicycle which is in the opposite extreme to ALL the big mountainbike trends.

It is so sharp however that you need to be super accurate when you're riding; get your body language perfect or it WILL pitch you off. It torques up into powerwheelies during sprints and it's so short you only need to push your weight a little forward to be able to break traction on the rear wheel. It turns better than ANY bike I have ever owned.

'tis a polobike, it rides like an overgrown bmx and I love it.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 7:34 pm
Posts: 9306
Free Member
 

Short stays are over-rated imo, it's just become the latest focus because of other things that the short rears help offset or balance.
As said above, balance is more important, but it's easier to think (and market / sell) one aspect of a bike is the key to it all.

Look at front to rear centre balance, BB height, bar to BB relationship etc too. Variable geo shouldn't be needed imo unless you want the real extremes like a Bionicon. I guess it's another remote-lever on the bar if you like that kind of thing.

I ask because after going up a tyre size on my Voodoo, I had to slide the wheel back for clearance. Seemed to make a noticeable difference in getting the front wheel up.
I'd take a punt on that being due to the shorter position correcting something else that may not be as balanced as it could be, but it's a punt as I know sod all about the bike's geo or your set up. I have a bike with an EBB and from one extreme to the other makes no difference beyond noticing somethings moved for the first few minutes of the ride. I prefer the BB at the lower position but the chainstay length isn't anything I worry about.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 7:50 pm
 Bez
Posts: 7371
Full Member
 

I can't see the picture in Retrodirect's post but I want his bike.

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 8:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had supershort chainstays before they were cool [/hipster]

[img] [/img]

 
Posted : 02/03/2012 8:27 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]

 
Posted : 03/03/2012 11:06 am

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!