Any real world diff...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] Any real world difference between slx 675 and xt 785 hubs?

6 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
51 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looking at purchasing a new set of wheels from rose bike. Both are mavic xc717 rims with the same spokes but i can have either of the above hubs but the price difference is £15. Now its not a lot of money but i cant seem to find what the difference is, i assume xt will be marginally lighter but essentially close to identical in every other way. Does xt have a more convenient feature to it that hasnt trickled down yet?


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 9:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes, XT will be slightly lighter and possibly better seals (though I have no idea how you would find that out for sure). XT uses smaller bearings, so there's an argument that SLX might be more durable.

I'd probably go for the SLX given that a marginal difference in hub weight is basically irrelevant.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 10:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks. That kinda confirms that any difference will go by unnoticed by me so slx it is.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 11:02 am
Posts: 16025
Free Member
 

With new Shimano hubs, I tend to find that there's not enough grease and the bearings are too tight. It's an easy job to remedy, and the hub will last longer as a result.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 11:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks ransos, i just read something similar so i will check them out. Read a lot of negative reviews for the xt hubs so definately going slx route.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 11:21 am
Posts: 943
Free Member
 

I've seen a few SLX freehubs go, on the 142x12 version.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 11:43 am
 sv
Posts: 2811
Full Member
 

If you look up shimano tech docs and compare their drawings/common parts you will see the differences.


 
Posted : 22/01/2016 12:25 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!