You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Just pondering that the Thomson stem on my bigger/full sus bike is on it's third frame and probably best part of 16 years old....do these things degrade/need retiring like climbing gear would be?
Thomson do consider their stem face plates as consumable, don't they? They recommend replacing them.
I have been riding since the mid-90s. I have seen one stem break in all that time, an old quill stem which went at the vertical weld, luckily just pulling away from a junction so very slow speed.
I have seven Thomson stems on my bikes, and a similar number of their seatposts. Never had any cause for concern with any of them, all secondhand and I've had them for ages.
I haven't snapped one, but as above, Thomson are known for faceplate/bolt lifespan issues, so maybe replace those. I wouldn't have thought the main stem body would be much of an issue. Or for peace of mind, go all in with a new stem/bar combo? I have broken one stem before though but that was an ultralight thing. Thomsons are a league heavier/ more durable than that.
Faceplate/bolt issues are due to ham fisted idiots, whether that be by over torquing or crossing the threads, misalignment of the top/bottom faceplate gaps or merely using shit hex keys and rounding out the bolt heads.
Flame away…….
Still a problem that only Thomson really had, even compared to lighter stems. Even if it's solely user error, if your product has more problems with user error than competitors (most of which are cheaper to boot) then it's a failing.
Much like their seatposts "they bend instead of snapping", no they bend when other things don't get damaged at all.