You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more
Im not sure i agree with this! That will screw it far more towards the lower end of the price range and tells us the average price of what folks spend on a bike, not what the average bike costs to buy.
Yep, I'm not sure either, but I'm going to argue my case anyway.
Surely the average price of what folks spend on a bike is the average bike. By definition.
its a number , That much is true.
The difference between claris and ultegra is night and day in terms of smoothness and speed of shift - my commuter has claris and the propel has R8000. Much smoother.
your 600 quid bike hasnt got disks
when you look at that kilo as a % of total weight package its minimal.
I have an MTB that weighs same as that domane . it wont go even close to as fast even with the same rider - even if the road points upwards.
Surely the average price of what folks spend on a bike is the average bike. By definition.
Yep, but the phrase that triggered this fantastically pedantic discussion was "mid-range".
Which means half-way between the top and the bottom. I think you could reasonably argue that that means half way between the top and bottom price, or the price of the bike that is half way through the range (i.e. same number of models above and below).
It's not a very useful measure, other than of manufacturers' ability to design ranges that make extremely expensive bikes look reasonably priced 🙂
Just buy golf clubs.
when you look at that kilo as a % of total weight package its minimal.
OK, turn it around. Would *you* walk into a shop and drop over £3k on a road bike that weighs that much, knowing full well that the same money could buy you a substantially lighter bike elsewhere? I'm not sure I would. (In fact, I'm pretty certain that I wouldn't!)
As I said, weight isn't everything, but it is something and that Domane is a good example of something I've known for some time - major manufacturers are lazy and they know full well that it costs money to make a bike light. By making it heavier, the frameset will be less expensive to make, will have a higher margin and thus they make more money from each one sold. Punters look at groupsets (well, rear mechs anyway) and flash carbon bits. They don't notice the cheap, downgraded chain and cassette, that the wheels are made of depleted uranium and that the tyres have all of the grip of skateboard wheels.
Of course we all know that speed is 95% rider, 5% bike, but it's still your money and your choice where to spend it. An expensive, portly bike is never going to be high up my shopping list...
I’ll be looking at pre-ordering 2021 build. Bikes are selling like hot cakes at the moment, unless you’re XS or XXL, there’s not a lot in stock anywhere
Orbeas are out of stock I was told this morning, 2021 are due in September.
My 'wishlist' is very similar to yours, also finding it difficult to find an Addict frameset in my size (none of the off the peg builds float my boat).
Current R3 is 7.1Kg and I know I'm going to have to stomach a 2 or 3 hundred grams extra.
As I said, weight isn’t everything, but it is something and that Domane is a good example of something I’ve known for some time – major manufacturers are lazy and they know full well that it costs money to make a bike light. By making it heavier, the frameset will be less expensive to make, will have a higher margin and thus they make more money from each one sold
Or the tech they've added to the frame to make it more comfortable has a weight penalty. Have you seen a Domane SL?
knowing full well that the same money could buy you a substantially lighter bike elsewhere? I’m not sure I would.
well i could have bought a lighter bike than my propel for my 3K Retail. wouldnt have had the features i wanted though.
still climbs like a stabbed rat.
Orbeas are out of stock I was told this morning, 2021 are due in September.
I've been told late July, but only Etap groupsets, apparently they can't get hold of Di2 groupsets.
Quite tempted by the 2020 Orca OMX M21eLTD-D, not 100% convinced, but maybe this colour...
other than the big SRAM boxes that is lovely.
other than the big SRAM boxes that is lovely.
I'd prefer Ultegra Di2, but due to CV-19 there is a global shortage, too many 'mid range' bikes being sold 😉
It's the one I'm looking at, but with MyO paint and hopefully a couple of tweaks to the build.
Interestingly a different dealer local to me has now also said July, so...
I’ve got the previous Domane sl, when I stopped racing I thought I’d go Uber comfortable and not worry about weight and speed. That mindset lasted about 6 months before I wanted a lighter bike.
Looking at the current Domane SLR, you need to be spending about £6k to get a 8.5kg bike. Nice looking bikes and I’m sure they meet their key criteria of being comfortable, but that’s a lot of weight for such an expensive bike. The Madone is similar. £7000 gets you an 8.1kg Madone with Ultegra Di2 or £5200 gets the lower spec frame, non integrated bar and stem and Ultegra Di2 weighing 8.25.
Be interesting to see what the new Emonda is like.
My Cannondale CAAD12 105 with saddle, seatpost and bars swapped out, ~1600g wheels and tubeless tyres weighs ~7.3kg. I reckon it will have been significantly less than £2k in total. So another £3k to find 500g? Easy. If you're sensible and scrutinise everything.
Or have I missed something in the 90 odd previous posts since the OP?
Or have I missed something in the 90 odd previous posts since the OP?
Well the OP wants aero, completely concealed cables & disc brakes as well as 6.8kg.
Not really relevant to the OP's post but as the Domane has been mentioned a couple of times:- I bought a 2018 model SL6 disc 2 years ago and it rolled in at 8.2kg and it's now jumped to 9.3kg which I don't get, as aside from increasing the cassette from 32 to 34t and the fancy wee cubby hole in the down tube the spec is pretty much the same. Love the bike btw, does exactly what I want, really comfy over long (for an old decrepit git like me) distances.
This reminds me a bit of when (maybe 15 years ago) I really had to have a sub 20lb mountain bike. I built one (thankfully not at all that much expense) only to find that I didn't particularly like riding it.
I suspect you could spend a fair bit of cash building a 6.8kg bike but with the only actually value in it being able to tell folks how light it was and bore them by telling them it was the same weight as a Tour de France bike.
My Roubaix is never going to be particularly light (it's 8.2kg even with Dura-Ace wheels fitted) however for me at least I suspect it'd be faster over distance than many/most lighter bikes as it's so comfortable.
I'm also a fat biffer so would probably break a really light build!
This reminds me a bit of when (maybe 15 years ago) I really had to have a sub 20lb mountain bike. I built one (thankfully not at all that much expense) only to find that I didn’t particularly like riding it.
I used to race a sub 20lb Scott Scale many moons ago, absolutely loved how it flew up hills, wasn't quite so good on the downs (more me than it though)....
[url= https://live.staticflickr.com/4137/4853214445_f3126db19b.jp g" target="_blank">https://live.staticflickr.com/4137/4853214445_f3126db19b.jp g"/> [/img][/url][url= https://flic.kr/p/8oRZz8 ]The Scale[/url] by [url= https://www.flickr.com/photos/brf/ ]Ben Freeman[/url], on Flickr
I think folk's expectations of weight are set by some fairly optimistic claims..
2019 Tarmac expert disc here with mechanical ultegra, paid £3250 in sales last year & that weights 7.3kg in 58.
I weighed the very same bike in medium on the shops park scales and without pedals it was around 7.6kg as I recall (I remember as it was pretty much identical to the tcr I also had my eye on). Likewise I fail to see how it would be lighter than the 7.5kg sworks with full duraace that the chap mentioned he was selling earlier in this thread.
If you weigh it 10 times on luggage scales and pick the smallest reading maybe, but in reality I'm pretty confident that's not it's real weight. Still a cracking bike though, it was a choice between that and my tcr when I bought mine last year.
Gcn did a vid where they weighed the pros bikes, and there were a good few that came in around 7.3 as I recall.
Gcn did a vid where they weighed the pros bikes
This one?
or this?
Some ideas here too:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZsH75dRROw
Anyway, what's so clever about 6.8kg if you just want a road bike and don't care what the UCI say?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPn4RNvn4EE
Gcn did a vid where they weighed the pros bikes, and there were a good few that came in around 7.3 as I recall.
Thankfully, the pros have realised that weight is not the be all and end all of road bikes and actually aero, stiffness and comfort are all more beneficial.
Thankfully, the pros have realised that weight is not the be all and end all of road bikes and actually aero, stiffness and comfort are all more beneficial.
An interesting way to spin it.
Give it another couple of years development and they'll have all that "aero, stiffness and comfort" and be "10% lighter than last years model" (neglecting to mention the 20% gain a few years previously).
A bit like disk brakes have gained 10% more power every year since the 90's, yet I still remember my C2's having by far the most power and solid lever feel.
I think folk’s expectations of weight are set by some fairly optimistic claims..
2019 Tarmac expert disc here with mechanical ultegra, paid £3250 in sales last year & that weights 7.3kg in 58.
I weighed the very same bike in medium on the shops park scales and without pedals it was around 7.6kg as I recall
I'd also doubt it a little. I have a 58cm S-Works Tarmac SL6 disc, albeit in a fairy heavy acid mint green camouflage paint, with Ultegra 8070 di2, S-Works carbon bb30 Chainset and Roval CLX32 wheels, with Fizik R1 stem/bars and saddle, Dura Ace pedals. it's 7.17kg on my Ultimate scales.
Sounds about right, Blazin
Just weighed my S-works SL6 there now - same paint job as yours - so with Vector pedals and elite bottle cages, it's coming in at 7.6kg
so change the R8000 chainset to a DA one and could get it down to 7.5kg
so no idea what you'd need to spend on it to get it down to below 7kg
With all the “lightweight” carbon Domane mentions, god knows how much my 2015 AL2 weighs!
I’ve fluctuated between upgrading the wheels to save weight or buy a carbon bike.
Fortunately I’ve lost 13.5kg since Jan instead as that’s the cheaper option!
so no idea what you’d need to spend on it to get it down to below 7kg
About £4500 on a pair of Lighweights and £1000 stripping all the paint off and clear coating it I reckon.
so about £11k / kilo - Bargain 🙂
The main issue is that even 5k bikes do rarely come with great wheel sets. Set of Zipps or Knights are what 2k? Enve’s getting close to 3k.
5k should get you a good frame, probably Ultegra Di2 and some form of carbon wheels.
But there will be parts making up weight, like alloy bars and stem. Heavy BB. Possibly a 105 cassette etc. And again, the wheels and tyres may be on the heavy side.
If I were you I would start with a good bike fit (hard at the moment) and then get pointed in the right direction on frame sizing (frames measure fairly differently). And then go from there.
The good news is at 5k you will get a very good bike, and one you can probably upgrade a long the way.
, just that buying a bike for the longer term is a bit of a different perspective.
Two propels and a Defy Advanced SL. If I were to choose one bike for the future, it would be a new TCR Advanced SL. With manual Dura Ace if I could. As it is, I don’t have to choose. Aero is faster, but the Defy is stiffer. The TCR is the middle porridge. The Defy is my long term bike. That frame won Paris Roubaix. And I don’t want discs.
The 6.8kg is really all about the wheels. Once you’ve DA’d up, carbonned those bars, stem and saddle, you’ll be about 7 kilos. Lighter means tubs and carbon wheels. Tubs are too much of a compromise for me. Oh and if you want light you need titanium speedplay. Because the mechanism is in the cleat so the pedals weigh less. sad.
If I was spending 5k today, it would be a pro-level (Advanced SL or S-works) frame, ultegra Di2 and the best wheels I could manage to budget. You won’t get Dura Ace without a compromise elsewhere. And you won’t get manual DA.
Oh and if you want light you need titanium speedplay. Because the mechanism is in the cleat so the pedals weigh less.
Funny you mentioned this, I was idly considering where I could save some weight on my Rose. Turns out the best bang/buck answer is my shoes! My basic Lakes weigh almost 820g/pair so there's an easy 300g of rotating weight to save.
I don't care what anyone else says, my lightest bike is my funnest bike, and since everything I aspire to on the road bike involves pointing uphill (laughable considering my weight...) I'll continue to try and make it lighter.
If I was spending 5k today, it would be a pro-level (Advanced SL or S-works) frame, ultegra Di2 and the best wheels I could manage to budget. You won’t get Dura Ace without a compromise elsewhere. And you won’t get manual DA.
And you won't get much in the way of wheels, once you've dropped £3400 (S-Works Tarmac) on a frame, £1k on a groupset, and £400 on a bar/stem/tape and pedals.
For 5k you are not going to get a world cup level bike. Simple as.
Just look at the prices.
Frame 2.5 - 3k
Groupset 1k at least - that is ultegra or force, not DA or Red
Wheels 2k
And then you still need stem, bars, seatpost, saddle, headset - easily another 1k
What about power meter?
Off the shelves Canyon may get you close (ish) but still not world cup level.
I spend "a little" more a couple of years ago and got a custom Festka frame, complete Sram Red etap disc, Knight wheels, carbon components, Chris King headset and Quark power meter. It is closer to 8 kg I would say, but it is unique and the bike I wanted - and it fits me like a glove.
Why the adversity to disks tired ?
It's 20grams well spent 🙂
Not really relevant to the OP’s post but as the Domane has been mentioned a couple of times:- I bought a 2018 model SL6 disc 2 years ago and it rolled in at 8.2kg and it’s now jumped to 9.3kg which I don’t get, as aside from increasing the cassette from 32 to 34t and the fancy wee cubby hole in the down tube the spec is pretty much the same. Love the bike btw, does exactly what I want, really comfy over long (for an old decrepit git like me) distances.
I'd love to know why the jump too. Anyone got any inside information? Would be interested to know if the frame itself has put on a few grams, or if it's just bits. If I had to guess, it's hidden componentry cost-cutting to save money and maintain pricing levels. You'll probably find a square-taper bottom-bracket hidden in there somewhere 🙂
Why the adversity to disks tired ?
It’s 20grams well spent 🙂
I agree. I put discs on mind. I also think it will be harder and harder to get good choice of wheels for rim brakes going forward.
With all the “lightweight” carbon Domane mentions, god knows how much my 2015 AL2 weighs!
Hard to know exactly which it is, what with the confusion of bike model years, but this review from 2014 suggests 9.5kg. Today's AL2 will cost you £600 and weigh just the wrong side of 10kg and, if buying another one, you'll be spending a fair old chunk more money before you get down below the weight of your current bike.
Ride on! 🙂
I agree. I put discs on mind. I also think it will be harder and harder to get good choice of wheels for rim brakes going forward.
Agree , a mate of mine works for a UK wheel manufacturer.... And is/was very vocally old school in his views on disks since their inception......
He now has disks as thats where the good wheels at.
I agree. I put discs on mind. I also think it will be harder and harder to get good choice of wheels for rim brakes going forward.
Disc brakes a no-brainer here, despite the (modest) weight penalty, for two reasons:
1) braking performance, especially in grim conditions,
2) zero rim wear, especially in grim conditions.
If you only ever ride your bike on sunny days, or race, then I would agree that the difference is more marginal, but chuck in some ropey weather and especially winter roads, and there's no comparison. Only downside I've had is that the calipers nearly always need tweaking between wheelsets (unless they are identical, of course!), which is a bit of a pain. That said, I often had to tweak pad position between different rim-brake wheels, so it's no bad thing, but disk caliper positioning is a finer-art and generally once I've got it set up, I'll leave it be even if it means riding deeper rims in crosswinds than I would normally choose!
For 5k you are not going to get a world cup level bike. Simple as
I posted a £4k Rose that was 6.2kg with Dura Ace, 50mm carbon wheels, semi-aero frame. So if by 'world cup' you mean integrated cables and discs then I suppose you're right.
but chuck in some ropey weather and especially winter roads, and there’s no comparison
If you wear ear-plugs, or have some sort of miracle set up that still works reasonably quietly on cold wet rotors... I'm never going to stick carbon rims on a winter bike so will stick with basic aluminium rims and rim brakes.
Wet carbon still gives me the fear with rim brakes .
I wanted deep carbon rims. = Disk brakes.(which are silent)
If you wear ear-plugs, or have some sort of miracle set up that still works reasonably quietly on cold wet rotors… I’m never going to stick carbon rims on a winter bike so will stick with basic aluminium rims and rim brakes.
No magic - just keep the rotor true and clean, and torch the pads from time to time to get the contamination out of them. I like Shimano rotors which seem to be the least squealy to me. Can't promise that they'll never squeal, but they're pretty quiet and they stop on a dime!
Anyway, I think we digress here... 😉
Subscriber
With all the “lightweight” carbon Domane mentions, god knows how much my 2015 AL2 weighs!
I’ve fluctuated between upgrading the wheels to save weight or buy a carbon bike.
Fortunately I’ve lost 13.5kg since Jan instead as that’s the cheaper option!
Yes, yes. And do a poo and carry one bottle. Non of these are mutually exclusive are they? Light bike + light body + mega dump + one bottle + aero = happy camper.
Not sure about the 20g uplift for discs? Maybe in the components but the frame and fork's are usually heavier to cope no?
Disk frameset are heavier than rim for the time being as manufacturers are having to design a bike that accepts both. With time and the move away from rim brakes the designers will bring the weight for disk brake down as they wont need the compromises to cater for both.
The quicker rim brakes are forgotten about the better disk frames will be.
Well the rims be lighter , if you live in hilly(mountainous) area no risk of overheating the tire or the carbon rim delaminating (happened to a clubmate on a set of lightweights in France)
I guess you could argue front wheel and non drive side rear spokes will be longer as no longer able to straight pull and the rear spoke angle not so good so less stiffness(triangulation)
There was also the issue towards the end of rim brakes and the into of aero brakes where you had hidden brakes that didn't work. Gen 1 propel stock + carbon wheels - the levers were merely a suggestion.....stopped me buying a propel until they brought out the disk model.
Disk frameset are heavier than rim for the time being as manufacturers are having to design a bike that accepts both
Is that really an issue though, I can think of one, maybe two framesets out there that are disc and rim compatible, and they are quite deliberately not at the pointy end, designed as versatile winter frames e.g. Kinesis 4S. The majority are very much disc OR rim.
Anyway, I think we digress here…
Haha, my fault, that argument is like a sore tooth for me, can never resist prodding it. I think I'm hoping one day somebody will come up with a solution to squealing discs that I HAVEN'T tried and then I can finally jump on the bandwagon!
My Cannondale CAAD12 105 with saddle, seatpost and bars swapped out, ~1600g wheels and tubeless tyres weighs ~7.3kg.
This sounds very light. Is it disc or rim brake? My Caad12 105 disc with Hunt wheels on (1550g I think) was very much the wrong side of 8kgs. It’s now wearing a lighter saddle and Ultegra di2 but doubt it’s down to 8kgs still. At some point I might get some better wheels for it to shave some more weight / get a bit more aero - but think I’d also need to go for carbon post / bars / stem to get below 8kgs.
The quicker rim brakes are forgotten about the better disk frames will be.
Yeah, MTB went through a similar phase in early 2000's where frames had disc and canti mounts, optimised for neither.
The idea now of buying a quality MTB frame with canti mounts is laughable!
A bit like disk brakes have gained 10% more power every year since the 90’s, yet I still remember my C2’s having by far the most power and solid lever feel.
Take off the rose specs.
They were good in the day. In recent back to back tests with tech 3 e4s showed them to be very solid ......ie wooden levers and very grabby giving a feel of lots of power but actually very lacking in over all stopping power ......and let's not forget the amount of front piston seals we would cook in a weekend of racing at fort William
Hard to know exactly which it is, what with the confusion of bike model years, but this review from 2014 suggests 9.5kg. Today’s AL2 will cost you £600 and weigh just the wrong side of 10kg and, if buying another one, you’ll be spending a fair old chunk more money before you get down below the weight of your current bike.
That's a surprise! Pre-lockdown I was on the verge of moving to a rideable commute and I was going to justify a new bike on that basis- the Domane to commute on and be a winter bike and a spangly carbon & disc bike for "best".
The need has gone in the current circumstances, but the want is still there!
This sounds very light. Is it disc or rim brake?
If people quote rough weights for their bikes then I tend to assume they haven't actually weighed them so ~7.3kg is probably ~8.3kg in reality.
My rim braked Roubaix with a mix of 105 & Ultegra but with a light saddle, carbon post and fairly light Dura-Ace wheels was 8.2kg when I weighed it (which I'm happy enough with), so I'm a little sceptical of weights in the low 7's for bikes with heavy wheels and 105. Particularly when you see how many of the pro bikes were in the low 7's but with much better wheels and kit.
Haha, my fault, that argument is like a sore tooth for me, can never resist prodding it. I think I’m hoping one day somebody will come up with a solution to squealing discs that I HAVEN’T tried and then I can finally jump on the bandwagon!
Heh, it's cool - we've all been on a group ride and been "that rider" that sounds like a cross-channel ferry manoeuvring in port at every junction.
Best tip I can offer is the blow-torch. Take the pads out, stick 'em on a concrete slab and burn them with fire. Get them good and hot, although be careful not to heat so much that the pad separates from the backing, and you'll burn off the contaminants which IME are a big contributory factor to wailing brakes.
That said, some bikes just like shouting and they can be an absolute arse to sort. There's no question that toeing in rim brakes is a load easier... 😉
I thought it was the norm that even decent road bikes came with crap wheels as roadies would already have a few pairs of wheels already for different types of road racing, is that not the case anymore due to disc hubs and carbon rims?
By world cup I meant a bike which would be at a level where it would be or could be represented in the world tour / conti tour / world champ level. I am sure the Rose is good value, but it is not on that level.
I love the idea of an aero road bike with discs but as I only tend to bimble around the - very rough - back roads of West Lothian. I don't think I'd like reality though of the extra discomfort and extra cost over my Ritchey Logic.
I could be wrong though.
Anyone have experience of riding an aero bike as their only road bike living in the central belt of Scotland?
I love the idea of an aero road bike with discs but as I only tend to bimble around the – very rough – back roads of West Lothian. I don’t think I’d like reality though of the extra discomfort and extra cost over my Ritchey Logic.
I could be wrong though.
Anyone have experience of riding an aero bike as their only road bike living in the central belt of Scotland?
Hey snap! I ride out of Kirkliston so West Lothian is a happy hunting ground.
I've always been given the impression that aero might be faster but are usually stiffer and less comfortable? As such I'd only buy one as an n+1+1+1 time trial bike for the Lang Wang. Otherwise I'm sticking to my 'endurance' bike and just trying to make it as light as possible without compromising comfort, there's some nasty little gradients in those Bathgate Alps! The long time trialish sections that I do ride seem perfectly fine, am occasionally tempted by aero wheels but couldn't afford a set that wouldn't be significantly heavier than my current 30mm deep Fulcrums...
6.8kg Road bike.... but why? Its widely accepted that up to something like a 7% gradient aero is quicker and on the flat this is enforced even more.
My new very aero road bike with 48mm carbon wheels (DT ones) Di2 and hydro discs is quoted at 7.6kg sans pedals, so add some pedals, a couple of cages, a fancy computer mount that bolts under the stem and hey presto you're at lets say 8.2kg. Its considerably faster than the very definitely 1/2 kilo or so non-aero bike it replaced and even on climbs steeper than 7% its as fast as its considerably stiffer so more of tha powers gets to the road, but its also nearly as comfortable thanks to a 27.2mm D shaped aero carbon post, the right saddle choice, carbon aero bars and nice comfortable tape.
I know plenty of people with amazing scales that log bikes at fantastic weights that would trouble some professional weight weenies if they were actually realistic.
More importantly and something I mentioned in my first post is bike fit. Most places might even credit the cost of the fit against the purchase price. So look at a few shops that are well respected for bike fitting and carry some of the options you like and go from there.
I have bought from Sigma and Bespoke in the past. Both very good, but prefer Bespoke.
No point having an aero bike, if you have to ride it with loads of spacers and on the hoods all the time.
Hi 13thMonk, I used to work at QM in Edinburgh about 4 years ago (I was at McGill's) and you were one of the consultants I think. Small world.
I do most of my riding these days either riding with the kids or on my jack jones on my SS riding around Beecraigs but I did go out last night with my pal on the road bike (now that we're allowed) and did a loop over to Bathgate which went up Puir Wife Bray, that's a good climb especially when you then head over carnpapple.
Drop me a mail if you fancy meeting up sometime or if you're ever heading over linlithgow way oneeyeianatgmaildotcom
Ian
This sounds very light. Is it disc or rim brake?
A caad12 disk won't be weighing 7.3kg that's for sure. Especially not with 105 and not especially light wheels. My bike has a lighter frame, lighter wheels, lighter groupset..and yet weighs considerably more.
But it's not just weight folks exaggerate about. Lots of folks go on about how their aero bike is far faster than a normal one. In reality, at full pelt it's probably going to be about a minute faster over 50 miles tops...and how many folks ride at full pelt for 50 miles unless you are in a break away in a pro race?
Basically, i suspect folks have shiny bikes they have spend obscene amounts of cash on and exaggerate the benefits of their purchase to somehow justify it to themselves..me included
Basically, i suspect folks have shiny bikes they have spend obscene amounts of cash on and exaggerate the benefits of their purchase to somehow justify it to themselves
Yep, most people would be fine on something like a £1K Specialized Allez Elite but where is the fun in that.
I agree that weight isn't everything as when I built up my Ritchey using 105, mostly components from planetx (albeit pretty light parts) and a hope/stans wheelset I already had (because I was poor) with the intention of upgrading everything. But it rode so well I just couldn't justify the hundreds of pounds needed to lose 1kg. I've ridded 200km audaxes, 100 mile sportives in the borders and highlands and have even taken it to the French alps and it was great at all those rides. I still have a sneaky look at fancy Ritchey builds on the web sometimes though which starts me making up upgrade spreadsheets.
Anyone have experience of riding an aero bike as their only road bike living in the central belt of Scotland?
Never mind an Aero bike, I see a noticeable difference between my two "endurance" bikes on some of the rough roads round here (that being Balerno and into West Lothian in my case). My ancient Roubaix is a bit more compliant and has a more relaxed riding position than my SLR Endurance - over distance that makes it faster even though they're very close in weight.
Since moving back to Edinburgh I've not ridden my time trial bike yet but suspect that's going to be quite uncomfortable on some of the local roads!
I hired a carbon Colnago with Di2 Ultegra groupset when on a family holiday in Majorca a couple of years ago, it was good but I still prefered my Ritchey.
When we hired bikes from Decathlon for a cycling holiday around lake Como last year, the bikes were pretty standard alloy bikes with 105 groupsets. I was really impressed with them, just shows how good a £1k bike is. I'd still have been on my Ritchey though (see a trend?)
It's the OP's money and of he wants to spend £5k on a bike then I am very happy for him and a bit jealous. 😀
Cheers epicsteve for the info. Indeed the road surfaces in Scotland can be a bit rough, when watching the tour of Britain last year the commentator described the surface in Scotland as being "heavy" and knocks a considerable amount off the riders average speed, never heard that description before.
The worst I've seen (for a complete road surface I mean not just a normal road with a load of potholes and parches as there is too many of them to mention) is the climb out of Slamannon, it makes your glasses bounce off your face!
No point having an aero bike, if you have to ride it with loads of spacers and on the hoods all the time.
you ride in the drops all the time ?
I guess the alternative is to get a bike with a longer headtube so you have zero adjustability in how high the stem sits if over time say - your flexibility gets better or you change tact. id chop out about 3cm of spacers if all i planned to do was evening league road races but my bike is set up so i can do 250k rides.
But i guess it depends if you had a bike fit via the Illuminati rules or via a prescribed protocol
being “heavy” and knocks a considerable amount off the riders average speed, never heard that description before.
T
it sure is . did 200k on sunday out to glenshee and it was about 3 kph slower than a similar length route on the majorcan silk roads - even though we went over sa colabra
Nice one. Never managed So Calabra as I wasn't fit enough. I did a loop from Alcudia up the tough - and first alpine type switchback - climb of Coll de Soller and back down the lovely descent into Pollenca. Would like to go back.
Why the adversity to disks tired ?
Your "mine" might be singular 😉 . I like to switch wheels between bikes. I also don't like rubbing. My favorite wheels by far are my HED Jet 6/9 with alloy brake tracks. The 6 is deployed on the front of the TT bike, TT Propel and Road Race Propel. They also go well on the Defy, but that's for looks. Giant's Carbon SLR aero carbon wheels are my stock for that bike.
Also Hydraulics and concealed cables. I want a light stiff frame and the ability to work on it. And whatever anyone says, a disc braked wheel cannot be as aero as a hidden front brake.
If you want an aero bike with a long headtube, you want a Propel. Headtube is as long as my Defy. Not Specialized Roubaix tall, but the medium is long enough that I don't need spacers. And I am no yoga bunny. I need about a cm of spacers on a conventional medium road bike frame.
@joebristol - It's rim brake. Carbon hylix in-line seatpost, ti railed saddle, Cube carbon bars, carbon stem top cap..... Actually thinking about it a bit more....only the STI levers and the front mech are 105 😳🤣. The rear mech is a Microsoft Arsis, 165mm Ultegra cranks and Dura Ace rim calipers.
Mostly eBay secondhand or Chinese carbon. And I bought the bike in the sale. I know it's not disc and aero but just illustrating that a few sensible kit choices can lose a chunk of weight without massive expense.
This thread has been quite funny to follow it's gone from the OP observing that a £5k bike with many of the expected bells and whistle (Aero/di2/discs) is a heavier than expected proposition and from a bit of criticism over the definition of "mid range" to what seems like a broad acceptance that if you want those features and to be threatening the UCI weight limit you're probably going to have to spend what £7k(+)...
Which then sort of begs the question, if you were spending £5k (I can wish) on a "for best" road bike, what compromises could you accept and why?
My own first thought was, why not trade off the discs and Di2 options, you can still get a rim braked aero frameset and mechanical/rim braked ultegra an have change for some fancy wheels and finishing kit to drive the weight down. Just accept you'll need a winter bike or at least some Al training wheels and you've got that lightweight aero whip...
But then I though a bit more and TBH I don't reckon I'd notice an extra kilo and a half as much as all that and while I want di2, it's not quite a need, I'd be inclined to trade away the di2 option and accept a weight more around 7.5ish kg for t he sake of having an aero disc bike that is probably more "future proof" in terms of wheels/tyres and where drivetrain are headed (at some point I reckon shimano will simply stop certain lines from including a non-disc option)...
I do think there are probably some bargains to be had on non-disc road bikes over the next year or two, but that is going to start drying up as the OEMs begin to ditch rim brakes...
Its not singular how ever I did decide to move lockstock into this century with my new bike when I realised that any decent groupset would not be backwards compatible with my "good wheels" or my other road bikes/TT bike
That has the advantage of keeping my good bike off the turbo as it's set up with a 10 speed same as all our other bikes.
Propel is a lone wolf sure thing.
But then I though a bit more and TBH I don’t reckon I’d notice an extra kilo and a half as much as all that and while I want di2, it’s not quite a need, I’d be inclined to trade away the di2 option and accept a weight more around 7.5ish kg for t he sake of having an aero disc bike that is probably more “future proof” in terms of wheels/tyres and where drivetrain are headed (at some point I reckon shimano will simply stop certain lines from including a non-disc option)…
Think I'd probably agree here. That weight feels about right for a compromise on price and longevity and I'd choose a light bike with discs over DI2 every day of the week.
Rim brake bikes will unquestionably become more niche over time, probably focused on racing more than endurance bikes, but on the plus side, I'm sure we'll see disc bikes get closer in weight and aero at the same time.
my compromise was not having Di2
I wanted disks and i wanted carbon wheels. weight wasn't even that much of a consideration as i could do to lose 10kg my self before i'm back at my former glory of hillclimbing. I'm very much a rolling terrain headwind blocker for the group specialist now 😀
I was gonna have mechanical advance 2 disk 105 green model + adding some chinese carbon wheels (as its our team colour no less) until my old boss cut me a deal on the advance 1 ultegra for a similar enough price to the 2 before adding the wheels.
Calls for a spreadsheet!!!!
Hi 13thMonk, I used to work at QM in Edinburgh about 4 years ago (I was at McGill’s) and you were one of the consultants I think. Small world.
Ha, good to hear from you! Yeah I remember now we sneaked a bit of bike chat in to progress meetings now and then...
Linlithgow is a regular destination on my rides, either coming along the coast from SQ on the gravel bike or through the Alps on the road bike.
Will drop you a line, have hijacked this thread enough 😀
Rim brake bikes will unquestionably become more niche over time
That's why I keep trying to persuade people to buy them, to maintain enough demand that there's still a decent selection on the market when I'm next ready to buy! A lot of European manufacturers don't seem quite ready to ditch them yet thankfully.
@tpbiker & Blazin saddles; Just re-weighed it & you're right. Actually bang on 7.8kg w/o pedals or all the other crap we hang on our light weight bikes to make them useable. I think i combobulated myself with the weight of the 8.3kg 10 year old Roubaix it replaced.
Then i weighed it again with the following sportivey crap & some pedals attached;
Garmin & mount
2 x blinky lights
2 x cages
Micro emergency pump (which i actually used the other day to help someone with a soft tyre).
saddle bag with 2 tubes, 2 canisters & a tool.
Pedals & knee saver extensions.
9.1kg:(
Still, at least it looks good (in my eyes).
It’s very doable but probably not off the shelf, and probably not with Discs. Depending on the size, a cannondale supersix evo rim brake frame pre 2020, built up with Ultegra, a careful wheel choice and a smattering of carbon finishing kit should get you there including pedals:cages for well under 5k. Get close to £5k and you can have deep section wheels too!
My 58cm supersix with ultegra and bora 35s was 6.8 on the dime, including arundal cages, speedplay zeros and alu bars. It’s still the same weight with etap, 50mm scribe clinchers and carbon bars.
Also possible with a CAAD, although you’ll probably have to be more spendy on wheels and groupset!
I can’t work out how to quote. But to answer Trail-Rat’s question;
“you ride in the drops all the time ?
I guess the alternative is to get a bike with a longer headtube so you have zero adjustability in how high the stem sits if over time say – your flexibility gets better or you change tact. id chop out about 3cm of spacers if all i planned to do was evening league road races but my bike is set up so i can do 250k rides.
But i guess it depends if you had a bike fit via the Illuminati rules or via a prescribed protocol“
No I don’t. But I am comfortable riding in the drops, which is more than you can say about a lot of people riding aggressive geometry bikes, where they would probably be more suited to something less aggressive - and consequently they would probably be more aero on a bike that fitted them better.
I have had two fits - one by James (now Richmond cycles) and one by Bespoke. They are both pretty much spot on the same - and both striking the right balance between comfort and power. Both bikes also allow for some reduction in stack, should I want to.
As I said, I would always prioritise fit first and then choose the bike. Particularly when spending that sort of money.
My Open Upper with carbon wheels (1460g) full Bontrager XXX carbon finishing kit, Dura Ace/GRX Di2, tubeless 32mm tyres, carbon crankset is 7.35kg, weighed on proper, calibrated bike weighing scales on my prep stand. It’s a 56cm, so middle of the road for size and whilst it is a gravel frame, it’s a damn light one. That weigh also includes a Bell, light and Garmin mounts.
Lighter hubs would save weight, smaller tyres...maybe, but I’d need heavier rims to cope with the higher pressures.
With 50mm rims, I’d be paying a 200g penalty, so 7.5kg.