4x4 damage on Houdk...
 

[Closed] 4x4 damage on Houdkirk Moor

81 Posts
33 Users
0 Reactions
207 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi All,

Latest news on the Houndkirk front. There have been two assaults recently elsewhere in the Peak when people have tried to have a quiet word with the motorised fraternity. At Baslow, a runner tried to alert some trail riders that there were kids on the trail ahead and got duffed up for his trouble. In the White Peak, a Peak Park Ranger got the same treatment, but I don't have the full details.

Suffice to say, some of these idiots are looking for an excuse to hand out a beating, so take precautions. Don't overtly record registration numbers if you see illegal activity, memorise it and write it down later. However, on sunday five 4x4's were doing circuits of the illegal trials loop on Houndkirk. They'd all removed their number plates, which makes identification a bit difficult!

Although the police are now taking this issue seriously, they're not committing a great deal of resources. So...... complain to your local councillor or MP. If the police get enough flak from the politicians, they'll have to do something about it.

But most of all, don't become a casualty!!

cheers
jh


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The few off-roaders that are left are going to be by far the bloody hardest to get rid of.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:12 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree with Sooty...


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The expression on some 4x4 drivers up on houndkirk when you overtake their 30 grand idiotmobile on a 400 quid hardtail mountain bike is classic 😉


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:21 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

I suspect those trying to "have a quiet word" started with "you ****s....." or words to that effect. Regardless, follow sooty's advice, they can be had cheaply these days.

Off-roading in a 4x4 is actually really good fun.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have no sympathy with any violence handed out but I do have sympathy when the 4x4 enthusiasts are seeing the hobby they really enjoy being driven out.

On this forum there are anti-car fanatics who delight in stating there opposition to any motorised vehicles. Thing is we are in a glass house, the ramblers in some areas would like to see restricted bridleway access to bikes and we cannot have it both ways.

There are plenty of cheeky trails about and unless you never ride these then you can't really have a pop at the 4x4 boys enjoying themselves. imho horses create more problems with my local trails in terms of damage in terms of volume of traffic.

I see comments like "the few off-roaders that are left are going to be by far the bloody hardest to get rid of" and I can't avoid thinking the author (and Sooty and RudeBoy) don't give a toss about eradicating what is for some a great hobby.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the few off-roaders that are left are going to be by far the bloody hardest to get rid of

Count - There's logic behind what I'm saying and we're 100% on the same wavelength. I've got to go offline as they're locking the office, so TBC tomorrow 🙂 (unless the thread falls into some kind of 1 thousand post irrelevant argumentitive nightmare, in which case I doubt I'll bother).


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Count - have you seen the damage they are doing up there? I don't mind them using the houndkirk road (green lane) itself but the mess they have made with their circuit in the peat at the top is really bad.

(Edit) If I were a self respecting 4x4 enthusiast, I would be very annoyed about the idiots going off piste up there, as it a) brings 4x4 and trials bikers into disrepute, and b) is causing so much damage that a likely response at some point will be to ban them from the area entirely


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:34 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Count - Isn't this thread about [i]illegal[/i] 4x4 usage?

Having seen the damage caused by illegal 4x4 usage as well as that caused by mtbers riding footpath I can honest say that the damage caused by MTBers pales into insignificance beside that of 4x4's. Some studies even believe that mtbers cause less damage than a comparable number of ramblers due to a heavier footfall over a smaller radius from staring point.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 5:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Count - Isn't this thread about illegal 4x4 usage?"

yep it is, the area in question off the main houndkirk route is a SSSI, and as the recently errected signs say the people using motorised vehicles are risking confiscation of their vehicles and a very large fine. Probably why they have removed the number plates. The main houndkirk track is suffering from the increased 4x4 usage, but it's not too bad yet.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 6:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to drive a 4x4, I used it to take young and old disabled/less able folk out of the towns and cities so that they could get a chance to see the countryside. It was once of the best experiences you could wish for, many of them had never been so far from anything man made. It was quite literally moving. I also used to be the RoW officer for a large off road club, we worked very hard clearing Byways, laying hardcore & improving drainage, requesting TRO's and educating people to identify illegal activity as well as how to report and follow it up.

The Ramblers association and their foul, greedy, corrupt and complicit old boys network of political members & lobbyists successfully destroyed all of that. Assholes who believed they had more of a right to walk in the countryside "without interruption to their spiritual uplift" eroded what little access rights Off Road driving enthusiasts had.

I'm not surprised that people are now receiving a hostile reception when voicing their displeasure at vehicular usage (legal or now more likely illegal).

Alun Michaels and the rest of those selfish bigoted red socked cronies are ultimately to blame.

I suggest you live and let live, the earth has a very robust durinal course, its been there for hundreds of years and its not about to disappear just because it gets a bit muddy.

I'm no longer a representative for the 4x4 community, to be honest I know why they feel like that, I would suggest you keep your distance and if you get close, a smile won't get you a kicking.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 6:50 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Count: have you seen the damage on houndkirk? i respect the rights of 4x4 owners to do their thing legally and responsibly but they are basically destroying the area.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 6:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how exactly are they "destroying" the area? do you mean, "making it muddy"?


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

mr nutt: As you were what appears to be a responsible off roader surely you can not support what is illegal driving that is destroying one of the nicest areas of countryside in the UK


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 6:55 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

mr nutt. The vehicles are leaving the main track and creating an offroad "playground" over the moorland. And no its nut just making the area muddy it really is destroying the area which will take years to recover.

Racing Ralph posted some pictures last year, before the wet weather which shows how bad it was then, let alone now!


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

to be honest vetantarider I think the term "destroying" is bullshit, its all part of the anti-4x4 propaganda spat about by the RamAss, have you ever seen what a modern plough does to a field? have you seen them DESTROYING THE COUNTRYSIDE, miraculously after a shockingly short period of time that very same area is filled with crop or lush grassland.

LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE NATIONAL TRAIL NETWORK IS OPEN TO MOTORIZED VEHICULAR USE!

LESS THAN ONE PERCENT!!!

Is it a surprise that 4x4 enthusiasts have no other option but break the law or be accused of DESTROYING the few open routes?

NO ONE has ever given me a descent reason why all the Roads Used as Public Paths (RUPP) were downgraded to RESTRICTED BYWAY.

It was an act of government sanctioned THIEFT, no more no less, Access to those routes was STOLEN by the countryside's most selfish and vocal user group.

The only erosion that was actually occurring was that of normal peoples freedom.

go ride somewhere else, go back a few months later and you'll wonder what all the fuss was about.

LIVE AND LET LIVE.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

destroying the area which will take years to recover.

how the hell can you believe that? go on, educate me, how is [u]that[/u] going to take "years to recover"??


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]

The bottom two are about 6-8ft deep and full of water.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

direct linking not allowed Ralph, can you try again?

edit: used right click to view in another window


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:11 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

mr nutt: as i said i support the right of 4x4 drivers to do their thing legally and responsibly. It is not other countryside users fault that there are limited areas where they can go. If you know Houndkirk I am not talking about the main track through the moor which does cut up that i am talking about its off of this. I presume you have not seen this damage because if you had I would not for one minute think you could defend it!

For what it's worth I do believe it will take years to recover and if it keeps on being used as a playground it obviously never will.

Another point is that within a mile or so of this area there is an "official" offroad course


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6-8ft deep? really? eight foot deep? do you seriously expect me to believe that?

and how exactly is that going to take "years to recover"?

I also fail to believe that that was "before wet weather" as I remember rightly it pissed it down throughout last year!

what do you think would happen to that little expanse of soil should it be abandoned again? with in a matter of weeks the countryside would have begun to reclaim it and after a matter of months you would ride past it and think "what a beautiful and lush area", because the soil had been aerated and churned.

What you see there is the DIRECT RESULT of excluding and persecuted a group of enthusiasts and forcing them to find out of the way areas to participate in their chosen pursuit.

If they were able to legal traverse more than LESS THAN ONE PERCENT of the countryside you wouldn't end up with such concentrated usage.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you genuinely believe this:

It is not other countryside users fault that there are limited areas where they can go.

then sir, with all due respect, you are ether an arse or completely ignorant as to the relentless anti-4x4 lobbying and campaigning carried out by the Ramblers Association.

whats more if you:

...do believe it will take years to recover and if it keeps on being used as a playground it obviously never will.

then you clearly have no understanding of the countryside nature or agriculture.

oh, and last but not least:

Another point is that within a mile or so of this area there is an "official" offroad course

I suppose you only ride trail centers, after all, why would you ride anywhere else?


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:29 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Right, this is my last post on the subject.

Those pictures RR posted were taken last year well before winter set in and do not show the real extent of the damage.

I notice you havn't said if you have actally seen what we are talking about!

For your information I am not a treehugging anti-car activist and do infact own a 4x4 myself.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The fact is, there are some areas that cannot sustain certain types of use, especially in certain conditions. That includes hiking, mountain biking, horse riding, and motorised vehicles. If you can't travel through an area without damaging it, you shouldn't be there, or you need to find another way of doing it such that your impact is negligible.

The argument that you can go somewhere else and come back later is hardly appropriate if you live in an area which is being (literally) eroded infront of your very eyes and have no means or access to other areas.

How can you justify actions that have a damaging effect on places, landscape, heritage and other species, or the negative impact these actions have on other people's enjoyment and value found in such places? Regardless of how one percieves one's own actions, most would consider their own actions in relation to the ways in which they impact on others.

Obviously if you believe the world is a resource that can be used indiscriminately to satisfy individual desires at the expense of other and future generations, and that ultimately the satisfaction of personal desires trumps all else then this line of argument will not wash. Some might call this selfish. Keep on truckin' as it were.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MrNutt do you make an effort to be a cock or does it come naturally. The latter i guess! Come ride with us and see for your self!


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

actually, I've had enough of this, I lived it, tried everything I could to keep the countryside open for all and not the selfish minority.

I've argued this through and through, I've learnt that people prefer to believe what they are told to believe by the peer groups they aspire to belong to.

I've seen people build successful political careers on selfishly eroding other peoples freedom.

I've seen common sense & decency fail in the face of greed & selfishness.

I expect them to come for the Trail Riders and Mountain Bikers next.

And they will probably succeed.

because of close minded "believers" in their "righteous cause".

I'm not arguing this anymore, its a lost argument,

Common freedom was the argument, and freedom has been lost.

Don't expect to be able to ride the Rights of Way network for anymore than five more years, then, when you're within a mile or so of an "official" offroad course. Don't ask yourself "what happened to my rights?".


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr Nutt "6-8ft deep? really? eight foot deep? do you seriously expect me to believe that? "

yes they really are 8ft deep or more in places. The area is soft/acid soil and cuts up very very easily. The main track is an old stone laid road, that has for years stayed in a very good state of repair. Recently the 4x4s have started to re use an area formed by the creation of a national gas pipeline, creating a route off the main track. The 4x4s have been playing in this area to the point where the vegetation has been stripped back and the topsoil completely destroyed. The area is higher than the main track and the loosened soil has been washed down the hill onto themain track.

This has turned the hard sandy track into a mess. Also, 4x4s have been driving up footpaths that radiate off the byway. These footpaths are very soft soil and the result is an impassable bog, whereas before there was a 2ft wide hard footpath.

A lot of the 4x4s have started using houndkirk road after being banned from some of tracks over totley moor, where the damage was so bad that hollows developed that would completely cover a 4x4. Then the 4x4s went around them turning the track into a 20ft wide bog impassable to all other users.

I'm all for respectable usage, but on tracks 15 min drive from the city centre you seem to get all sorts of ****s using it who dont know/care how they drive over it


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 5759
Full Member
 

MrNutt.
Ok I can accept that by being hounded out of an area it might annoy people, but beating people up because they had a word is utterly stupid, even more so if one of them does happen to be a park ranger.
If your pals keep that up they are surely going to get 4x4's banned from all areas in the park


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mrnutt check your email


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

racing_ralph - Member
MrNutt do you make an effort to be a cock or does it come naturally. The latter i guess! Come ride with us and see for your self!

Its all natural I'm afraid, I can completely accept that I am a cock, an idiot and often wrong.

This was an issue that was close to my heart, my heart was broken when I had to tell them that we couldn't go out in the truck out anymore, because the walkers had closed the countryside.

I fought long and hard, spent may a sleepless night trying to protect countryside access rights and reconcile that despite my best efforts all had been lost.

I am bitter, I sold my truck, I stopped walking in the country and walked away from it all. Now I couldn't care what happens, if its "illegal" I couldn't care less, there's plenty of countryside out there for everyone to use.

I'll take you up on the offer of the ride though, that said, I am a complete cock 😉


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've seen common sense & decency fail in the face of greed & selfishness.

I agree- common sense and decency should result in people behaving in ways in which they consider the result of their behaviour. Irresponsible behaviour as in the original and subsequent posts clearly does not show any characteristic of this.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

name the date - a week on saturday/sunday is good for us


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

grahamt1980 - Member
MrNutt.
Ok I can accept that by being hounded out of an area it might annoy people, but beating people up because they had a word is utterly stupid, even more so if one of them does happen to be a park ranger.
If your pals keep that up they are surely going to get 4x4's banned from all areas in the park

They are not "my pals" I'm completely out of the 4x4 loop as it were, I've had nothing to do with offroading for years now.

I'm not surprised that its turned to violence, that is all, I don't condone it anymore than I condone exclusion of selected user groups, its violence that is usually the last refuge of the persecuted or oppressed.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 7:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

looks like something is being done about it though:

http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/letters/Shared-concerns-on-Houndkirk-Moor.4908229.jp

Perhaps John should have drawn peoples attention to this:

The banning of vehicles using the road legally would, we believe, exacerbate rather than reduce the problem of illegal activity on the moor, and lead to knock-on effects elsewhere. If however, anyone witnesses illegal off-roading, they should contact South Yorkshire police on 0114 2202020.

If you see illegal activity REPORT IT TO THE POLICE.

Going to "have a word" is not a sensible option, Like I said; violence is usually the last refuge of the persecuted or oppressed.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

There should be a place for everyone to enjoy their hobbies and I was dismayed at hearing the recent lobbying to stop green laning. However Houndkirk and similar areas of National parks is not the place for 4x4 playgrounds!


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 45648
Free Member
 

Funnily enough, while taking pics of my bike tonight on Houndkirk a Landrover passed - I looked up and said hello with camera in hand - he immediately stopped and quite aggressively challenged me about taking a picture of him 😐
I just said I was taking pics of a new bike, he carried on.
I have the No. plate though - I might call police on 101 and let em know.
I hadn't thought anything of it until seeing this thread.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:09 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]We very much share the concerns expressed, and a plan of action has been drawn up by Sheffield City Council, Peak District National Park Authority and Natural England, with support from South Yorkshire police. This includes repairs by landscaping, fencing and revegetation of the damaged ground. [/i]

So now the taxpayers are having to foot the bill for the repairs and we are going to have fences put up spoiling the landscape further!


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:11 pm
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

I'm not surprised that its turned to violence, that is all, I don't condone it anymore than I condone exclusion of selected user groups, its violence that is usually the last refuge of the persecuted or oppressed.

Oh dear. Next time a rambler makes me feel a bit oppressed, I'll be sure not to have a quiet word with him............

.....I'll just kick his f***ing head in


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:13 pm
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

MrNutt, i'm not going to insult you, but if you really want to know what the 4x4s are damaging on Houndkirk moor and why it will take years to recover (try decades actually, peat doesn't exactly form overnight) then i suggest you start here:

http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:e57eo37XwUIJ:www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/2000354.pdf+houndkirk+peat&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:14 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[/i]Oh dear. Next time a rambler makes me feel a bit oppressed, I'll be sure not to have a quiet word with him............

.....I'll just kick his f***ing head in
[i][i]

😀


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:14 pm
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

There should be a place for everyone to enjoy their hobbies and I was dismayed at hearing the recent lobbying to stop green laning. However Houndkirk and similar areas of National parks is not the place for 4x4 playgrounds!

Exactly - I'm sure there's some scabby old pit on the outskirts of Barnsley that would bring as much entertainment.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I believe that access to the rights of way network should be a natural right, that said I also believe that National Parkland should never be subject to sustained "playing", nowhere except dedicated "Pay and Play" parks should be used for that. But the criminalization of the driving on hundreds and thousands of miles of National Trails will no doubt have forced the "we can't drive anywhere legally, so lets drive anywhere" mindset.

Its not right, its wrong. This situation is the creation of the Ramblers Association and their lobbying.

Its bad. I have no part in it, but I'm not surprised its turned out this way. 🙁


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:16 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Exactly - I'm sure there's some scabby old pit on the outskirts of Barnsley that would bring as much entertainment.

😀 I think there is a good place called "Oakwell" or nearer for sheffield folk is bramall lane


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

or nearer for sheffield folk is bramall lane

'koff 'ker 😉


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have to agree with the travesty that was the downgrading of RUPPs to byways - one of my riding mates is a red sock when he's not riding mtbs and we have long rows about why motorised access should be available to the countryside - apparently it's [i]too noisy[/i] and [i]spoils the atmosphere[/i]. What tosh, as MrNutt says it'll be trail riders and then mtbs, and we'll all be illegal and have to beat up ramblers who come and have a quiet word.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:25 pm
Posts: 5938
Free Member
 

Even round my local routes there are 4ft ruts, hub deep lakes etc. caused by motorised vehicle use. Large parts of my local bridleways and byways have been rendered almost impassable. I really want to agree with Mr Nutt in some respects, because it seems an awful shame for some people to lose their right to do what they want in the countryside. But what is the way forward when the needs of different trail users are not compatible?


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nah the Ramblers will become too infirm to walk, repeal the ban, take their 4x4lite's down the byways then petition to metalise the routes citing disabled access and you'll all be forced to wear a helmet even when walking in the countryside (and to be carrying the appropriate licenses)


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But what is the way forward when the needs of different trail users are not compatible?

open more routes which would reduce traffic load, have people display a "RoW license", like a road tax disk that is purchased for a nominal fee but it would be a legal requirement to be displayed should you wish to use the RoW network, failure to display would lead to destruction of the vehicle.

Simple. as they say in the USA, Tread lightly.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MrNutt, I have been abused , threatened and driven at by 4X4 drivers simply for looking at them (yes literally just that because they couldn't get over a particular difficult patch). If you represent them or even defend these idiots then you are just as bad. This tread is about illegal use. You really are a typical 4x4er.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

i have been part of off roading for many years, trails . racing , greenlaning etc, the problems are the ramblers , they are a powerfull body of people, do not underestermate them , if you want to "blame" someone blame them.re-open more routes, the knee jerk reaction of the early 2000s in a pile of poo , and dose not help the country side at all ,or acsses to it.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yep, thats what I've been saying isn't it fauxbyfour, that I agree, represent and defend these idiots?

NO ITS NOT

I said I am not surprised that it has come to this, many responsible 4x4 users have been driven out of the hobby and the remainder will be treated as lepers due to the campaign of demonization carried out by the Ramblers Organization.

I'm sure that there are still many responsible drivers of off road vehicles.

This tread is about illegal use.

Yes, I understand that, and if you hadn't noticed I DO NOT CONDONE ILLEGAL ANYTHING.

You really are a typical 4x4er.

ah, so its an insult now eh? fair enough,

I used to legally drive an off road vehicle, encourage and "unofficially" police the activities of a large number of club members. I used to use my vehicle to help others and spent almost every weekend carrying out unpaid trail clearing (burnt cars, fallen trees, etc). I was most defiantly a typical 4x4 driver.

you may not have noticed that earlier in this thread I posted up the number of the police force concerned and urged people to contact the police should they witness any illegal activity and NOT TO CONFRONT THEM.

Like I've also said before, [u]I am[/u] prone to being a cock, I'm not ashamed to admit it, I have opinions and I'll share em.

I don't however condone any kind of attacks on people, I can see why some "hardcore" element may take exception at being told they shouldn't be there, my guess is they already know that.

and they arn't cocks, those are ****s.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 8:59 pm
Posts: 4401
Free Member
 

For MrNutt's benefit.

No-one is disputing the RoW for 4x4s over Houndkirk Moor. Unfortunately though some drivers have taken to driving off the established RoW through the Peat, leaving what looks like a 4x4 play-park. This area near the summit used to be very small, but in the last few months seems to have quadrupled in size and the adjacent footpath also seems to be seen as 'fair game'.

I guess this may partly be due to Totley Moor being closed of, however that place was getting like the somme, in areas random muddy tracks covering an area up to 30 metres wide for a stretch of probably about 200m. The main irony of this being that 4x4 drivers wanting a 'challenge' in their cars that could easily drive round the world drove round the mud pits.

This display of disregard for the sustainability of their routes / access agreements and general inconsiderateness leaves me with little room to be sympathetic.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 9:19 pm
Posts: 45648
Free Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have no sympathy for illegal offroading. I condemn it. It should be reported to the police immediately. (see the number posted earlier, if you live around there, stick it in your mobile phone and use it!)

If however, anyone witnesses illegal off-roading, they should contact South Yorkshire police on 0114 2202020.
[url= http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/letters/Shared-concerns-on-Houndkirk-Moor.4908229.jp ]ORIGINAL LINK[/url]

That point of view doesn't mean that I believe OffRoaders to be inherently bad people, in fact mountain bikers are very very similar in so many ways!

I do however have ZERO tolerance for the ramblers and their association.
Their organization can burn in hell for all I care. Liberty thieving bigots.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

no that didn't work, Matt I just had a look on your link, what are all those strange areas around there? there's what looks like a quarry and something that looks, sort of large purple and random? (if you scroll down wards from your image?)


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 11388
Full Member
 

I used to drive a 4x4, I used it to take young and old disabled/less able folk out of the towns and cities so that they could get a chance to see the countryside.

Is that common practice then? I have to admit that I've seen very few disabled folk being driven around the Peak in 4x4s let alone on trail bikes.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BWD, I knew a few folk that did it, I also used to go out driving with the missis and with friends, we'd often drive for hours, slowly and then all stop, eat, laugh etc

It was really good, no violence, no "damage" to the countryside, lots of bird watching, photography, endless chatter about technical aspects and condemnation/praise for Fox shocks!!

It was good (mostly) clean fun, whilst it lasted. 🙁


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 9:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr Nutt- I appreciate your posts, although I don't agree with much of what you've written, I think you get at a useful point. People who drive and ride off road are a pretty diverse bunch. Some of us are more similar than others, and even "ramblers" can be considered in this category. Unfortunately some people are ****s in all walks of life, and their actions reflect badly on people associated with them. The problem for 4x4/trail bike users is that their actions have the [b]potential[/b] for far greater disturbance and damage than any other user group. Responsible access for all should be respected, but some areas cannot take the pressure of certain uses and in some cases [b]all[/b] motorised access is inappropriate.

For what it's worth, I'm happy to share the landscape with anyone, they're all people under the red socks, lycra, tweed, jodphurs, visor or cucumber. When debates descend to "all XXXX's are ****s" it doesn't get anyone anywhere (metaphorically?). I'd far rather be out and about with reasonable people who consider the environment and others than inconsiderate and selfish ones. Again, the problem for vehicle users is that a single instance of inconsiderate or ill-judged behaviour has far more serious and longer-lasting impacts.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am not against off-roaders per-see but feel that on this occasion they have overstepped the mark. There needs to be access in the right places but here they have left their legal rights of way and damaged large areas of "protected" habitat.

Houndkirk Moor is heather moorland. Whilst that might seem unremarkable in Britain, when viewed from a larger perspective 75% of the world's heather moorland is in the British Isles.

It is an important habitat for species like the red grouse which are endemic (found nowhere else) to the British Isles. This habitat is already facing huge pressures due to climate change, urban encroachment and erosion by increasing visitor numbers.

The moor is in a national park and is supposed to be in a protected area yet on an average weekend the British can be found wheelspinning their 4x4's over areas that are away from the main track.

Someone commented earlier that "there is loads of countryside" but to me this isn't the case anymore. Urban encroachment has seen large areas concreted over and the areas we still have are all to often getting trashed very quickly. Round me people just chuck trash out of the car window and fly-tipping is rife. Nobody is systematically picking litter up out in the countryside leading to further degredation of the areas.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"no that didn't work, Matt I just had a look on your link, what are all those strange areas around there? there's what looks like a quarry and something that looks, sort of large purple and random? (if you scroll down wards from your image?) "

the ribbon like white/pale track to the southeast is the byway, the other light/pale areas are the 4x4 playground off the byway.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 45648
Free Member
 

And the odd shapes in heather are some burnt areas, and some managed / replanted areas.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I agree C_P, not so much that a single instance can cause irreparable damage, rather a single apple can spoil an whole batch. Unfortunately there are bad apples in [u]every[/u] orchard.

What happened with the 4x4 community was that the Ram.Ass. directed what was essentially a campaign of hate and intolerance against a large community of recreational drivers, the majority of whom were responsible. There were a few very heavily publicized areas that were branded as irresponsibly DAMAGED, this was done by a tiny minority which the 4x4 community was actively trying to prevent. As the hate campaign escalated reasonable people were driven away. I personally have been verbally abused, punched, spat in the face, and had windows broken, all by "red socks". The actual violence happened on three occasions, everytime it happened I had seen walkers 200m ahead and pulled aside then switched off my engine. Why? to not disturb their walking. The first time it was a woman that spat in my face, unprovoked, I wasn't even looking at her (I was reading a bird book).

I stopped off roading because I could no longer trust myself should somebody attack me, these attacks were always unprovoked and were instigated by the walkers.

The last assault where my drivers window was smashed there were two young children in the back of the truck.

I continued to try and fight to keep the RoW's open but I was on a loosing battle, the MP's were complicit, the media jumped on the bandwagon with the green issues and these kind of attacks were becoming more frequent across the country and the hatred was setting in on both sides, it got ugly years ago.

Now its abhorrent. I've seen both sides of it (I've also dealt with a few arsehole offroaders)

but like I say, I'm not surprised that some idiots are lashing out when they are essentially being interrupted whilst breaking the law. But would you wander up to someone braking into a car and expect them to calmly discuss their ill advised adventure? what kind of reaction would you expect?

If you see someone breaking the law, report their activity to the police immediately.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 11388
Full Member
 

BWD, I knew a few folk that did it, I also used to go out driving with the missis and with friends, we'd often drive for hours, slowly and then all stop, eat, laugh etc

It was really good, no violence, no "damage" to the countryside, lots of bird watching, photography, endless chatter about technical aspects and condemnation/praise for Fox shocks!!

It was good (mostly) clean fun, whilst it lasted. [:(]

If only the off roaders in the Peak were more like you instead of the mindless ****s they appear to be.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 10:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd like to point out that all the responsible 4x4 owners, myself included, are totally against the 'off-piste' driving as is being discussed in this post. The subject is often condemned in the 4x4 press. I've driven this lane myself, if you see a red 110 stop and say hello, and am angered by what I've seen. It's a shame that 4x4's seem to attract the kind of people that see the countryside as there own personal back-garden which they can (mis)treat any way they want.


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 11:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not all 4x4 drivers are bad. A year or so ago (on Houndkirk Road) in the depths of winter a Disco pulled over by a large puddle to let me by and avoid soaking me. As I went through the puddle I hit a submerged rock, went over the bars and bounced head first off the OSF wing of the Disco 🙁

Rather that getting annoyed, the driver wound down his window, pissing himself laughing, and said 'wish I had my camera'


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 11:48 pm
Posts: 396
Free Member
 

i find it hard to understand what is responsible about any off road motorised activity in the peak - yes i understand the legal arguments and the history and can probably differentiate between legal (but in my opinion anti social) off roading and down right illegal and very antisocial - in the end the damage on and off legal ROW is there for all to see and the noise and aggression is blatant and is very much "f the rest of the world i'll have a good time at your expense"

yes there are some who cycle irresponsibly and i condemn them and their are some ramblers that tut tut at all and sundry but the outcome from their "bad" behaviour does a lot less harm


 
Posted : 16/03/2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

With regard to the original post, that states trailriders duffed up a runner, you will now find that this is not true.
The case has now been dropped by the Police.
The trailriders acted in self defence after being pushed off the bike by the jogger.
I doubt the truth will be told in the newspaper, in the way it was originally delt with.
In the meantime, it appears trailriders have been branded as people wanting conflict.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 11:49 am
Posts: 45648
Free Member
 

I agree - just like us bikers, most 4x4 drivers are great, friendly people out enjoying themselves.

That said, the minority spoil it for the few AND the extra damage 4x4's can do, in a short space of time, can be dramatic. I have never seen a 4x4 repair party fixing trails...Houndkirk as a prime example 10 years ago was a lovely, rocky n sandy old Roman Road/ Double track - its now a potholed, puddled, torn apart mess 30'+ wide in places. Its not the walkers and bikers doing the damage.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The trailriders acted in self defence after being pushed off the bike by the jogger. I doubt the truth will be told in the newspaper

Lone man in shorts runs halfway up mountain and beats up group of poor defenceless motorcyclists dressed in armour shocker. I can see the headlines.

🙂


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 12:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE NATIONAL TRAIL NETWORK IS OPEN TO MOTORIZED VEHICULAR USE!
LESS THAN ONE PERCENT!!![/i]

Fingers crossed we can get rid of that last fraction of a percent too.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

poor trolling Ian, .2/10 must try harder 😉


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lone man in shorts runs halfway up mountain and beats up group of poor defenceless motorcyclists dressed in armour shocker. I can see the headlines.

This statement is incorrect & made up, so it would probably be in the newspaper
a lie!


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 2:18 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

Mrnutt is right with some points we will be on the banned list next if we do not have a voice against "the ramblers". We are no different to the 4x4 people, we ride illegal routes and do loads of damage that is difficult to justify to a red socky person. We know that most of us have used that bit of footpath that we should not use. We do need to be careful who we condem, instead perhaps looking for the common good that would protect our access. Your average walker is also part of the damage problem, take a look at the Pennine way 30ft wide in places due to the boots getting round bog thing. If we use the contryside we all make a bloody mess. It's the human way. Anyway I thought the countryside was a work place not play area.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 4:02 pm
Posts: 242
Free Member
 

Glad i live in the Cotswolds nice and quite.Peaks they are paranoid about.I have been out up there many atime on a mountain bike and chatted to 4x4 drivers the last time was when i was coming down chapel gate guy said that must of been rough on that i said was bit wish i was on my motobike he just laughed.I have had gates open for me up there when i have been riding my motobike no problem.But then again what ever i ride i dont go out with a chip on my shoulder like alot of these mtbers do these days.Mr Nutt talks alot of sense you will get it when moutain bikers start to stopped.The National Trust would love to ban them over there land and that comes from someone very high up in there Swindon Head office.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

4x4 dirvers who want to go offroading on this sort of terrain should find designated offroad tracks. The rights of way act should put pay to this wanton vandalism.

MTB'er should also give due consideration to these environments (avois riding when it is has been excessively wet (use the road), but one bloke in a car will do more damage than 1000 MTB'ers.

I suspect the violent thugs that use motocrossers and 4x4's don't limit their aggression and lawbreaking to these remote places. Let's hope they get their comeuppance. But then we have to tolerate ****s like this all the time. The only language they will ever understand is being beaten to within an inch of their lives. No fair minded normal person is comfortable with giving them what they dish out, so this crap perpetuates!


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whatever off road sport we partake in their is always an element within who have no genuine regard for their actions or consequences of whether it be red socks,equine, 4x4, mtb or enduro bikes.These are the people who need to be tackled and moved on to their next "fad" sport, having competitively raced off road for twenty years and mtb for the same if not more it is a genuine problem in all areas.North wales also takes a hammering from the weekend warriors coming in from suburbia for their playtime and wreaking havoc. I agree 100% about the all powerful red socks and their single minded opinions about access and use being restricted as much as possible but to tar 4x4,horse and bikes with the same brush is wrong.The police are keen as hell to eradicate the "rogue" element and so are the rangers in their respective areas to - maybe phone calls to the powers that be when we see it happening? any other suggestions besides the usual beat them to death crap we seem to get


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 5:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Well, that kicked off didn't it?

Let's break this down:

Illegal 4x4 use - As far as I can tell, this is condemned by most right thinking folk. If you go on some of the 4x4 forums, there's endless posts vilifying the idiots who destroy fragile areas and give the rest of the fraternity a bad name. The fact is, the idiots will lose the responsible 4x4 users trails they've used for years.

Legal 4x4 use - I'm instinctively against banning anything, or else we might be next. But trail use has to be responsible. If my favourite trail is a mudbath, I try to avoid it for obvious reasons. The main problem on many Peak District byways is that the 4x4's use them whatever the weather. Surely the GLASS code of conduct should be stuck on the windscreen of every responsible 4x4 driver?? I got talking to a guy on Houndkirk recently. it was very wet and I asked him how bad conditions would have to get before he considered not driving over. He replied that it was pretty bad now and he had thought it might be a bad idea. He then told me how he was one of the responsible ones and had reported other drivers for illegal activities. He then left, hit the next mudbath in high ratio and gunned his landy for all it was worth! If that's being responsible, then I give up.

Self policing - Any other outdoor user group, whether it's climbers, MBers or whatever tend to self police. 4x4 users tend not to. That's the whole problem in a nutshell. If the 4x4 community is so worried about illegal driving, why don't you self police? Take it in turns to keep an eye on heavily damaged areas and pass on advice to those who don't have the brains to make a sane decision.

Any road up, if things continue as they are, 4x4 use will be curtailed. It's down to those who drive off-roaders to put their own house in order.

cheers
jh


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 242
Free Member
 

Hi John i agree with what you are saying but has more and more TRO etc are put on 4x4/motobike trails it puts more pressure on the the ones that are left so they get hammered then they are wrecked.So you get a total ban so what are these people going to do then not use the tracks they have always used just go anywhere and what problems that will cause.There is a ban on the Ridgeway thats seems to work quite well over the winter but the the tracks still get hammered because of the big tractors crossing it to get too the other fields but we need food.The countryside seems to be getting to small for everybody to live together.


 
Posted : 17/03/2009 7:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hi dobiejessmo,

Spot on mate. This is the biggest concern for the Peak Park Authorities. So I say again, I'm not calling for a ban. I want the 4x4 community to take responsibility for its own "bad eggs". They need to educate the reckless few even if that means giving up some of their free time at the weekend. What's wrong with GLASS posting 'wardens' near sensitive areas to advise other drivers as to what's acceptable and what isn't??

cheers
jh


 
Posted : 18/03/2009 10:18 am
Page 1 / 2