10 speed 9-42 casse...
 

  You don't need to be an 'investor' to invest in Singletrack: 6 days left: 95% of target - Find out more

[Closed] 10 speed 9-42 cassette for sir?

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
76 Views
Posts: 71
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yes, another gearing related thread! This could go the way of power meters at this rate.

[url= http://www.bikerumor.com/2015/04/16/soc15-ethirteen-extended-range-cassette-handles-xd-driver-differently-plus-new-cranks-more/ ]Have we done this?[/url]

XD body needed, but should cost less than XTR. Quite a lot of alu sprockets though, I'd worry about longevity.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:27 pm
Posts: 7544
Free Member
 

The luddites won't go for it. Needs an XD driver.

In fact, nor will I if that's the case- if I'm buying an XD driver and a cassette that likely costs over £100 then I may as well just buy an XT 11 speed cassette and shifter and [i]save[/i] money.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:40 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
Topic starter
 

But you still don't get the range, it's an extra option, but I do agree.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:42 pm
Posts: 5626
Full Member
 

Agree with the lonevity.

Although I don't understand the 9 tooth sprocket, I know it's to give the range of a double, but the jumps between the individual sprockets just gets worse. 9 tooth drivers on BMXs were / are just rubbish. There's not enough chain wrap, made worse by the rear mech.

I think this is just the next piece of the "More range than you arms race."


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:47 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Agree on the 9t, the 10t feels noticeably more lumpy on XX1, imagine that'll be horrible.

Nice fitting mechanism though - gets around the need for a one piece cassette.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:51 pm
 mos
Posts: 1585
Full Member
 

IIRC that's the reason SRAM didn't do a 9T, the lack of chain wrap causes issues.


 
Posted : 17/04/2015 1:54 pm

6 DAYS LEFT
We are currently at 95% of our target!