12 Things That Mountain Bike Magazines Need To Stop Doing

12 Things That Mountain Bike Magazines Need To Stop Doing

Oi! Stop it!

The response to our ‘Ten things the bike industry needs to stop doing’ feature a couple of years ago has been very good, with readers outraged and in agreement in equal measures. So, just because we like giving the hornets’ nest a prod every now and again, we thought we’d respond to one of the comments on there from cynic_al who suggested we need to do a ‘Ten things magazines need to stop doing’. Given that his article never appeared, we’ve taken it on ourselves to get the ‘Mirror of Truth’ out and see if we can admit to a few failings here and among our peers. We hope you enjoy it… 

Dirt Rag. They won’t be bothering you any more

Number One: It’s 2020

Harping on about the Glory Retro Years. In order to remember the glory days of Tinker and Tomac and chainstay-mounted U-brakes, you need to be at least 45 years old, which makes you a bit of a has-been already. Those were the days of cantilever brakes that didn’t work, tyres made of hard plastic and pudding bowl helmets. Get with it, grandad! There’s much better stuff going on right now.

It’s John Tomac, not a deity, OK?

Number Two: Deifying Riders.

It’s not all about Peaty, Peron and MacAskill you know? Just because they’re the quickest this week, or they have the best #shredits doesn’t mean you have to feature them Every Single Feature. It’s not that there aren’t a load of other great personalities and bike riders, racers and bike people out there. Where’s the John Peel fanzine version to the Top40 of the glossy magazines?

danny macaskill
OMG! It’s DMacA!

Number Three: The Mouthpiece

Being the mouthpiece of the bike companies. Seeing everyone come out with the same press release with the same information on the same day is getting a bit dull. Don’t you do any proper journalism any more? Where are the scoops and the industry insider leaks? 

Not that kind of Scoop

Number Four: Not Everyone Has A Bike Journo Shed

Assuming everyone has a bike shed full of top shelf spares to play with. It’s all very well for you to talk about the merits of different 12 speed chains, or to play with three different widths of carbon bars. Most of us are riding around on ten speed Deore. And the next time someone says ‘Oh, I just reached into the giant box of free tyres and swapped treads on my carbon rims…’

Oh this old stuff? I just keep it around because I like the colour of the boxes

Number Five: Where Are The Women?

Ignoring women. There are plenty of female mountain bikers out there, so why aren’t there any on your pages and staff rosters? If half of the mountain bikes are being bought by women, they don’t want to see sweaty blokes on every page. And don’t get us started by noticing how white everyone is…

Fort William World Cup 2017
Bloke, bloke, bloke, lass, bloke, bloke, bloke, bloke…

Number Six: Too Much Glamour

Always focussing on the exotic locations. No, we’re not all off to Whistler this summer like you are. We’re going camping in Wales. Having magazines full of exotic sunsets over places we’re never going to visit isn’t inspiring, it’s depressing!

whistler for mortals
That’s not Scotland! I want to see photos of where I live

Number Seven: Not Enough Glamour

Always featuring some dull woods or a quarry in England. Where’s the glossy magazine inspiration? We don’t want to see the same Surrey corners or Lee Quarry drops. We want exotic sunsets in Whistler to inspire us! There’s enough dull riding to be seen out the window.

That’s not Whistler! Where’s the glamour in that?

Number Eight: Going With The Standards

Ignoring the price of things. No one buys a new bike every year. How can you review six different SuperBoost wheelsets when we’re all on 142mm (that you told us then was the best wheel standard in the world…) Do more £500 bike tests and forget the £500 handlebars and GPS units…

syncros carbon silverton wheels scott spark
Ooh, no, it’s all about Super Extra Boost now, didn’t you hear?

Number Nine: What a waste

Ignoring the environmental impact of our sport. Yes, we’re riding push bikes, but what about the raw materials used, the carbon fibre we can’t recycle and the endless trips in the company VW T6 up and down the M4 to do all of those shoots at BikePark Wales? Not to mention flying off to California and the Alps a few times a year to get that one shot… 

But where does it all go?

Number Ten: You Print Magazines On Paper?

Printing magazines on paper. Don’t you know that the world’s gone online? Why are you still chopping down trees to print stuff months after we could have just read it on an iPad screen while simultaneously watching Celebrity Bake-off?

That’s a lot of wallpaper…

Number Eleven: Catch My Drift, Moto-Bro?

Talking like you’re from California/the Pacific Northwest/14 years old. ‘We’re stoked to see the gnarly trails being shredded by the sick cool dudes, man. Steeze’. You’re from Kent, you numbskull.

Pic from Skidsville. Look it up. It’s awesome, er, bro…

Number Twelve: Stop Making Lists!

Stop making lists of ten, twelve, twenty things that annoy us. You know that we never read this kind of thing…

😉

Chipps Chippendale

Singletrackworld's Editor At Large

With 23 years as Editor of Singletrack World Magazine, Chipps is the longest-running mountain bike magazine editor in the world. He started in the bike trade in 1990 and became a full time mountain bike journalist at the start of 1994. Over the last 30 years as a bike writer and photographer, he has seen mountain bike culture flourish, strengthen and diversify and bike technology go from rigid steel frames to fully suspended carbon fibre (and sometimes back to rigid steel as well.)

More posts from Chipps

43 thoughts on “12 Things That Mountain Bike Magazines Need To Stop Doing

  1. Love it!! From the comments here you hit the nail on the head! And please *always* keep doing inky print (as well as the digital things), it’s a fearless physical manifestation of thought, art, informed insight & opinion, it’s a beautiful, perfectly-proportioned object created with expertise & care, and will never run out of juice or lose signal. Much like our beloved bikes!

  2. Yes! As a 61-year old female whose main interest in the wide-footed, bouncy-front-ended type of bicycle is for bikepacking and longer days out in wild places rather than bike-gymnastics of the death-defying sort in foreign climes to which my pension will never stretch, I applaud you sir! (or madam!).
    I’m especially looking forward to your article “61 year old female tries cycle camping for the first time on long-distance UK off-road track”.

Comments are closed.