Would you buy a cycling product that’s made by a firearms company? There’s a good chance you already have

Would you buy a cycling product that’s made by a firearms company? There’s a good chance you already have

Some of cycling’s biggest brands, including Giro, Bell, Camelbak, and Blackburn, have become the target of a boycott by US cycling advocates – because their parent company manufactures firearms and ammunition.

Imagery from Vista Outdoor’s website shows a rather odd mix of activities

Vista Outdoor bought Camelbak in 2015, and purchased Giro and Blackburn from BRG Sports in 2016, adding to a portfolio that includes a large range of outdoor brands. The bulk of Vista’s businesses, though, are related to guns. Browse through the brands on their web page and you’ll see telescopic sights, holsters, ammunition, as well as the firearms brand Savage.

Some of Vista’s brands, including some very familiar names

While most of Vista Outdoor’s products appear to be aimed at the sport shooting or hunting market, there are some which strike a much more uncomfortable note in light of recent events in the US.  Savage, who manufacture an AR-15 style assault rifle, offers a free T-shirt with its guns, with the slogan “Support the second amendment: pass the ammunition”, while Millett Tactical’s website shows an assault rifle-carrying helmeted figure with the slogan “Engage. Neutralise. Next.”

It’s Vista’s support of the National Rifle Association, though, which has really brought down the wrath of the US cycling community. In the wake of the Marjorie Stoneman High School shooting – the eighth school shooting in the USA this year – firearms lobby group the NRA are once again in the spotlight. Vista spent over $500,000 on lobbying in 2017, and are a major sponsor of the NRA’s in-house TV channel, which been criticised by progressive watchdog group Media Matters for its attempts to deflect attention from tougher gun control.

The company is also active in the smaller, but still influential National Sports Shooting Foundation, an industry-led lobby group which has campaigned for the relaxation of “concealed carry” laws, and wants to rebrand semi-automatic assault weapons as “Modern Sporting Rifles” (Although they do also support some gun control measures, such as more thorough background checks)

The call for a boycott has been led by New York-based cycling advocate Aaron Naparstek, who set out his reasoning in a series of Twitter posts earlier this week. The link between cycling and guns has since made the front page of sustainable transport website Streetsblog (of which Naparstek is a founding editor), and UK industry website Bikebiz.

Why, you might reasonably ask, is a firearms company buying up cycling brands? The US gun industry is a volatile market, and thanks to relatively high levels of gun ownership there, it doesn’t take much to trigger a slump in sales. The election of Donald Trump, on a platform which promised relaxed gun control laws, meant that firearms enthusiasts bought fewer guns and stockpiled less ammunition, and in 2017 Vista’s shares lost 67% of their value. So the purchasing of other sports brands appears to be a way of hedging their bets.

The other questions raised by all this are ones for Giro, Bell, Blackburn and Camelbak’s prospective customers. Will they be OK with buying from a company that makes good cycling products, but also cross-subsidises the firearms industry? Is it fair to avoid a company because of who owns it, when its employees and riders didn’t get a say in the decision? For some people these might be  difficult choices. For others, perhaps not.

Singletrack Weekly Word

Sports Newsletter of the Year finalist at the Publisher Newsletter Awards 2024.
Find out why our newsletter is different and give it a go. Keep up to date and get our best editorial in your inbox.

Antony was a latecomer to the joys of riding off-road, and he’s continued to be a late adopter of many of his favourite things, including full suspension, dropper posts, 29ers, and adult responsibility. At some point he decided to compensate for his lack of natural riding talent by organising maintenance days on his local trails. This led, inadvertently, to writing for Singletrack, after one of his online rants about lazy, spoilt mountain bikers who never fix trails was spotted and reprinted on this website during a particularly slow news week. Now based just up the road from the magazine in West Yorkshire, he’s expanded his remit to include reviews and features as well as rants. He’s also moved on from filling holes in the woods to campaigning for changes to the UK’s antiquated land access laws, and probing the relationship between mountain biking and the places we ride. He’s a firm believer in bringing mountain biking to the people, whether that’s through affordable bikes, accessible trails, enabling technology, or supportive networks. He’s also studied sustainable transport, and will happily explain to anyone who’ll listen why the UK is a terrible place for everyday utility cycling, even though it shouldn’t be. If that all sounds a bit worthy, he’s also happy to share tales of rides gone awry, or delicate bike parts burst asunder by ham-fisted maintenance. Because ultimately, there are enough talented professionals in mountain bike journalism, and it needs more rank amateurs.

More posts from Antony

26 thoughts on “Would you buy a cycling product that’s made by a firearms company? There’s a good chance you already have

  1. I’m glad the point has been raised.

    As a rider who doesnt use Bell or Giro, and may look at a non Camelbak next time, the question is, ‘how far do you go ?’
    The NRA is vile as others already point out.
    But how’s about purchasing anything out of China ? That’s the non democratic, state owned, persecutionist *is that a word?) Human rights abusing China.
    Taiwan ? Still the money syphons back to China, doesn’t it ?
    What’s worse ? Americans shooting americans ? Or Chinese oppressing Chinese (and Tibetans, etc).

    Maybe the day will come when Hope and Orange make absolutely everything, all on Northern England.

  2. I’m happy to get behind this. I’m not going to dispose of existing products but I don’t plan any further purchases. I’m not particularly anti-gun but they can’t be freely available. I’m h

  3. Argh. posted partway through composing and can’t edit. :/

    Short answer, I’m not in favour of the NRA or what I view as their undue influence. I’m happy to deny them funds by buying other products. There’s nothing irreplaceable here.

  4. What is really fubar’d is that these companies lose money when a pro gun president is installed and that they seem reliant on the fear of restrictions to drive sales. I might pretend that mountain bikes are going to be banned to convince the wife I need to stock up on a DH rig…

    Anyway the Montaro is off the shopping list now, thanks for bringing to my attention.

  5. “But how’s about purchasing anything out of China ?”

    There’s a good point. Unfortunately we’re fond of good, cheap products. As has been discussed countless times on the forum, buying products made outside the far east is not cheap. However, if you can, personally I believe it a good thing to do.

Comments are closed.