Lynskey Handlebars – Discuss

Titanium. Three piece. 31.8mm clamp. 710mm width. Flipping light. Flipping expensive. Regular sweep. Or crazy mega-sweep (as in the pics).

View from the back.
View from the back.
View from the front.
View from the front.

Singletrack Weekly Word

Sports Newsletter of the Year finalist at the Publisher Newsletter Awards 2024.
Find out why our newsletter is different and give it a go. Keep up to date and get our best editorial in your inbox.

185cm tall. 73kg weight. Orange Switch 6er. Saracen Ariel Eeber. Schwalbe Magic Mary. Maxxis DHR II. Coil fan.

More posts from Ben

65 thoughts on “Lynskey Handlebars – Discuss

  1. agree jupiter, don’t trust them for some reason, looks like the sides will fall off as soon as you hit any sort of bump, will the warranty cover all types of riding? Are they maybe not a bit easier on the arms over bumpy ground like a titanium frame is supposed to be or is that just a load of bollocks.

  2. If people are worried a welded bar will fail, why are they not worried their welded frames won’t? I guess its ‘cos most riders have no clue about real engineering. Ah well.

  3. Sorry but they look ugly and unfinished to me. One of those love or hate components I guess…a bit like those horrible bent Thompson layback seatposts. Ti or not, I wouldn’t spoil my bike with them if they were £20 never mind £200.

  4. “Sorry but they look ugly and unfinished to me”

    Ugly? You should see me at this time in the morning.

    Unfinished? Yes – you’re quite right. Those are pre-production sample blast finish without graphics.

    I fitted them to my bike and they made me smile, and their aesthetic comes purely from the construction method used.

  5. God knows I like to spend money on bike parts, but as already pointed out, they’re not ‘extemely’ light, and are certainly uber expensive, compared to the competition. Also not a fan of the looks.

    I’m sure some folk will like them, just not me.

  6. So can anyone explain why they’re made the way they are? Is it to allow greater sweep than would normally be viable with a single tube bar? Is there some benefit to position? Is it stiffer? stronger? There has to be SOME reason, surely?

    And before I get told I’m being argumentative and have another comment pulled I’m genuinely interested in the thinking behind the design rather than bickering about looks.

  7. To do an oversize 31.8mm centre bar in titanium is very hard. To make it in one piece, you would have to start with a 31.8mm tube, then roll it down at the ends to 22.2mm, then put bends in. I have no idea if this is even possible. I guess Nasa could do it. It’s awfully expensive just in terms off tooling, and unless you butted the tube before you’d do it, you’d end up with very thick walls on the 22.2mm stuff.

    So I decided to suggest this method. Where you can choose the wall thickness you want for each section and just weld it together. The two 22.2mm bits have a single plane bend. The cross section has an ovalisation at each end, and a mitre. The centre is “re-rounded” after welding to make sure the bars don’t creak.

    We’re really happy with the results, and equally realise that the market for £200 handlebars is probably quite limited 🙂

  8. They do look fugly to me, whats the reasoning behind leaving the bit of tubing past the welds onto the cross piece? surely it would look neater and save some weight it it was cut/welded flush, and the tubing shaped to blend in.

  9. The look is growing on me. Don’t think they’re for me, 660 – 680 is wide enough pour moi.

    The biggest drawback I can see Brant is customers taking a leap of faith to buy. Can see take up being slow as people get to ride other peoples. £200 for a bar is a lot of outlay on something that is, let’s be fair, in appearance away from the norm. But obviously not intended as a mass Market thing like a Jones H Bar. Will there be a steel version?

    As Mr Bontrager said “light, cheap, longlife – pick any 2”

  10. “surely it would look neater and save some weight it it was cut/welded flush, and the tubing shaped to blend in.”

    Much longer weld on the bottom. And it’d still stand out. I’m happy with the “cut off BMX bar” look 🙂

  11. Most shocking part of the story –

    “I fitted them to my bike and they made me smile, and their aesthetic comes purely from the construction method used”

    Brant rides a Cube!

    I think they look good, if they conformed to the “normal” look they’d be just the same as everything else? But then i do like the Jones H bar!!

  12. But obviously not intended as a mass Market thing like a Jones H Bar. Will there be a steel version?

    Jones bars are mass market? Well I never…

  13. “Brant rides a Cube!”

    No – that was Benji’s test bike. I ride an on-one (currently)!

    “Jones bars are mass market? Well I never…”

    I think that’s the grammatic pedant in you coming out Chipps. Or you read it wrong 🙂

  14. “What’s in a name? that which we call a rose
    By any other name would smell as sweet” – Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare

    ” A turd, while polished, will always be a turd” – Sanny:-)

    I just don’t see the point in the same way that Jones bikes are to my eye an object lesson in fugliness and justification of a design that doesn’t really do anything better than the next bike along other than look that bit different. I’m curiously reminded of the mid 90s fashion for fancy bike bits that came from small manufacturers in a miasma of anodising. Where are they now, I wonder? I suspect the fact that there was a collective realisation that Mr Shimano made stuff that worked better, lasted longer and cost a whole lot less might have contributed to their demise.

    Still, if only for the reason of creating brand awareness, the fugly bars have clearly done a great job! 😉

    Sanny

  15. Surely the big advantage is the material? Ti has that bit of spring and vibration absorbtion like carbon, that Aluminium doesn’t. After breaking my wrist I wapped bars on two bikes to carbon or Ti and found it helped remove a problem with wrist ache. So these bars are competing with the likes of Easton Monkey lights on performance and I guess some people just don’t like carbon.

    The look is growing on me, but that is clearly a personal thing!

    Brant why not just use 22.2mm bar (butted if possible) and spacers at the stem clamp as some other manufacturers of Ti bars do? and with a choice of spacer size luddites (like me) that are still using a standard size stem are still served by the bar.

Comments are closed.